The Mind-Body Problem

The MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series

De: Jonathan Westphal

Narrado por: Sean Pratt

Duración: 5 h

Resumen del Editor

Philosophers from Descartes to Kripke have struggled with the glittering prize of modern and contemporary philosophy: the mind-body problem. The brain is physical. If the mind is physical, we cannot see how. If we cannot see how the mind is physical, we cannot see how it can interact with the body. And if the mind is not physical, it cannot interact with the body. Or so it seems.

In this book the philosopher Jonathan Westphal examines the mind-body problem in detail, laying out the reasoning behind the solutions that have been offered in the past and presenting his own proposal. The sharp focus on the mind-body problem, a problem that is not about the self or consciousness or the soul or anything other than the mind and the body, helps clarify both problem and solutions. Westphal outlines the history of the mind-body problem, beginning with Descartes. He describes mind-body dualism, which claims that the mind and the body are two different and separate things, nonphysical and physical, and he also examines physicalist theories of mind; antimaterialism, which proposes limits to physicalism and introduces the idea of qualia; and scientific theories of consciousness.

Finally, Westphal examines the largely forgotten neutral monist theories of mind and body held by Ernst Mach, William James, and Bertrand Russell, which attempt neither to extract mind from matter nor to dissolve matter into mind. Westphal proposes his own version of neutral monism. This version is unique among neutral monist theories in offering an account of mind-body interaction.

©2016 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (P)2016 Gildan Media LLC

Good Intermediate Text, but a Bit Too Editorial

What did you like best about The Mind-Body Problem? What did you like least?

The book lays out the basic arguments of various positions in the philosophy of mind and puts them in conversation well, at a level appropriate for listening while walking your dog.

What does Sean Pratt bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

The narrator nicely conveys the smug superiority that underlies most philosophical texts.

Any additional comments?

The book is not a simple exposition of the various positions in the philosophy of mind. The author will give you his opinion on the arguments he presents. While his treatment of physicalism is somewhat balanced and lengthy, he dismisses panpsychism out of hand and without argument. As a survey text this seems inappropriate. As does his endorsement of neutral monism in the final chapter.

Torturous Mental Flagellation

Got through 3 & 1/2 chapters and had to quit. Either this book proves I hate philosophy or that taking a false premise is an exercise in futility. If the former, I plead guilty. If the latter, I hope to find a treatment that doesn't assume itself up its own rectum.. Highly not recommended.

Left me wanting

Sorry, but this left me wanting to, wondering what he meant by “mind” and “consciousness.” I find neutral monism less than satisfying.

Multiple chapters without a point

What would have made The Mind-Body Problem better?

Chapter Title and quick matching summary
Where we were 25 years ago...studies done...new outlook (or conclusions)
Why it's relevant to you (the reader)
Topics to ponder/reflect upon...(Since the reader has a mind, a body, and a mind/body issue.

Would you ever listen to anything by Jonathan Westphal again?

Sure.

Did Sean Pratt do a good job differentiating all the characters? How?

No.

If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from The Mind-Body Problem?

Chapters 2-4 to be sure.