THE GREATLY MISUNDERSTOOD ANTINOMIANS
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
$0.00 por los primeros 30 días
THE GREATLY MISUNDERSTOOD ANTINOMIANS
Compra ahora por $3.99
-
Narrado por:
-
Virtual Voice
Este título utiliza narración de voz virtual
From Johann Agricola in the 1520s to Old School Baptists in the 1800s, “Antinomians” consistently read 1 Timothy 1:8–9 as teaching that the law is only for the ungodly, not for believers.
English Antinomians (1600s)John Eaton: To bring the righteous under the law is to use it unlawfully.
Tobias Crisp: The law is good only in its place — for the lawless, not the righteous.
Robert Towne: For the righteous, the law has no power nor is it their rule of life.
John Saltmarsh: The believer’s rule is Christ, not Moses.
Gilbert Beebe: The law was never given as a rule of life to the saints.
Samuel Trott: To apply the law to the regenerate is bondage.
David Bartley: Preaching law to the church is unlawful; the gospel is the believer’s rule of life.
Continuity
Law is good → for sinners.
Law is not for the righteous → saints live by Christ and the Spirit.
Misusing the law → produces bondage.
In short, across centuries, Antinomians insisted that 1 Tim. 1:8–9 excludes believers from the law’s dominion, making Christ alone their rule.