
Napoleon's Buttons
17 Molecules That Changed History
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Compra ahora por $17.62
-
Narrado por:
-
Laural Merlington
Napoleon's Buttons is the fascinating account of 17 groups of molecules that have greatly influenced the course of history. These molecules provided the impetus for early exploration and made possible the voyages of discovery that ensued. The molecules resulted in grand feats of engineering and spurred advances in medicine and law; they determined what we now eat, drink, and wear. A change as small as the position of an atom can lead to enormous alterations in the properties of a substance - which, in turn, can result in great historical shifts.
With lively prose and an eye for colorful and unusual details, Penny Le Couteur and Jay Burreson offer a novel way to understand the shaping of civilization and the workings of our contemporary world.
©2003 Micron Geological Ltd and Jay Burreson (P)2011 TantorListeners also enjoyed...



















Reseñas de la Crítica
Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:


















Needs to be required reading for science majors
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Not what I expected
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Informative and fascinating
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
If you could sum up Napoleon's Buttons in three words, what would they be?
Great read, fabulous info, good narrative, history we never get in school.What was one of the most memorable moments of Napoleon's Buttons?
The tin button fell apart under severe winter condition causing Napoleon's defeat - how simple.Any additional comments?
Not recommended read for simpletons devoid of education in sciences, history and deprived of intellectual curiosity, I believe.thoughtful and impressive
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Would you listen to Napoleon's Buttons again? Why?
Not really...so many books, so little time. I did find it interesting; however, I wish my knowledge of chemistry were more extensive.What did you like best about this story?
I liked how history turned on some interesting chemical discoveries.What does Laural Merlington bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?
She is a very engaging and expressive narrator.Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?
If I were on a long road trip as a passenger, Yes. Otherwise, I like to listen to one lecture per day.Any additional comments?
A person with a solid chemistry background would really enjoy this book.Interesting Trivia
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Hit and miss
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
The story was well written and had a good thesis.
Goog story poorly performed
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
And the pronunciation!!!! I almost never write a review but felt compelled to do so. Does no one with a science background oversee the production of an audiobook about science. Arrhenius' name was the most glaring mispronunciation. I can at least understand how the chemical compounds might be difficult, but Google will tell you how to pronounce Arrhenius. Just inexcusable.
Google Can Pronounce it Better
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Well done
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Regrettably, Laural Merlington's mispronunciation of countless chemical and other scientific terms really detracted from what was overall a fine performance. Example: She seemed to have a little trouble with her "a" sounds; she pronounced lactase "LACT ahhhz" -- fine if you're speaking French, but in English we use a long "a" as in "ace" -- and estradiol "es TRAY deeyol" -- I had to hear this word at least three times before I figured out what she was saying. (People familiar with this steroid say it "es trah DYE ol" -- because it is an estrogen steroid with two -OH groups on the steroid (i.e. a diol)). Another example: At one point during the discussion of antibiotics, she pronounced para-aminobenzoic acid "p amnio benzoic acid" at least six times in two consecutive paragraphs, even though she had said it correctly at a previous point. The upshot of all this criticism is that either the narrator or one of the other folks in the studio should have been a person with a scientific background, who would have known (and more important, would have cared) how to pronounce these words. It would have been ideal if one of the authors had narrated.
My one critique directed at the text itself is that the lengthy, preambular history of persecution of alleged witches in Chapter 12, on alkaloids, created an unnecessary delay on the way to the real content of this chapter: the historical connections to the compounds and their sources. This chapter would have stood up well on its own without the background information.
Wish one of the authors would have read this book
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.