
Moby-Dick as Philosophy
Plato - Melville - Nietzsche
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast

Compra ahora por $24.95
-
Narrado por:
-
Randal Schaffer
-
De:
-
Mark Anderson
Moby-Dick as Philosophy is at base a chapter-by-chapter commentary on Herman Melville’s masterwork, Moby-Dick. The commentary form of the audiobook subserves a higher end, the presentation of an ideal of the type "philosopher". Superimposing portraits of Plato, Melville, and Nietzsche - the thinkers themselves, their ideas, and their lives - it generates a composite image from the overlaying and interblending of figures.
At a higher level still, the audiobook is a meditation on the nature of philosophy and its relation to wisdom and the relation of creative artistry to both. It explores these themes in the context of the history of philosophy conceived as the rise and fall of a certain influential variety of Platonism - in Nietzschean terms, the life and death of God - and it proceeds with reference to the different reactions, as exemplified particularly by Melville and Nietzsche, to the nihilism that looms on the horizon of these intellectual and spiritual revolutions.
©2015 S.Ph. Press (P)2018 S.Ph. PressListeners also enjoyed...




















Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:


Very Good
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Finally, after listening to the sample for the 20th time, I admitted it was what my heart wanted. My motivation's aren't that obscure. The narrator goes at an excellent speed, the prose are compelling, and the story is engrossing. Now I have to read Moby Dick in text form, and I couldn't be more excited.
engrossing
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
This book answered many questions.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
As for the reader... no problem understanding the words he's reading, and his voice itself is fine. The issue is that he reads in a sort of sing-song way, with a tonal formula that is applied to every sentence (or two sentences in some cases). Sentences generally begin on a higher tone; important words within the sentence also get a higher tone; then towards the end of the sentence he drops the tone in preparation for a standard higher tonal ending, like a dismount. It's sort of like TV reporter reading an editorial from a script.
Once you realize what the reader is up to, it's very distracting. It also has the effect of making what is being read feel trivial, forced into a box. And missing opportunities for humor or to otherwise add to the pleasure of the work. A good reader takes each sentence for itself, giving the words and phrases whatever emphases and cadences are appropriate based on their context and meaning. This doesn't happen so much when you're following a formula.
Take a dramatic sentence like this, concluding a paragraph on the complexities of the novel: "The result reads like an encyclopedic prose-poem chanted by drunken angels in Hell," That's quite a sentence, and deserves special treatment. But the reader gives it the same treatment as everything else, and the opportunity for a dramatic moment is lost.
Notwithstanding that disappointment, I'm happy I listened to the book. And to be fair: although the reader was distracting and disappointing, he also added a layer of interest. I wouldn't have written this review otherwise.
Great Book, Poor Reader
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Terrible Narration
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Not enough Melville
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.