KJV vs. Anglicanism

A Scriptural Refutation

De: David Michael Curtis

Narrado por: Virtual Voice

Are you tired of the "milk" of modern institutional religion? Are you ready for the "strong meat" of the Word?

In KJV vs. Anglicanism: A Scriptural Refutation, David Michael Curtis presents a forensic, theological audit of the Anglican tradition, measuring its Book of Common Prayer, Thirty-Nine Articles, and ecclesiastical hierarchy against the absolute standard of the King James Bible.

This is not a book for those seeking a "middle ground" or a comforting compromise. It is a polemical defense of Sola Scriptura that challenges the foundations of the institutional church. Using the rigorous Sentinel Threefold System—a method combining exhaustive topical Bible study, logical fallacy detection, and philosophical analysis—this work dismantles the traditions of men to reveal the simple, unvarnished truth of the Apostolic House Church.

Inside this comprehensive volume (Book 7 of the series), you will find:

• 100 Specific Inquiries: A systematic breakdown of Anglican doctrines, offering both a "Summary Answer" for quick reference and a "Comprehensive Analysis" for deep study.

• The Via Media Fallacy: A scriptural exposure of the "Middle Way" theology, showing why truth is a narrow path, not a compromise between Rome and Reform.

• Institutional Audits: A hard-hitting critique of infant baptism, the "priesthood" of clergy, the Eucharist, and the Episcopal structure, contrasted with the biblical model of believer’s baptism, the priesthood of all believers, and the "Love Feast."

• The Blueprint for Liberty: A call to leave the "City of Confusion" and return to the freedom of the First-Century House Church model, where Christ is the only Head and the Scriptures are the only Canon.

Written for the Berean believer who refuses to outsource their understanding to a cleric, this book invites you to step out of the shadows of tradition and stand firmly on the Rock of the KJV.

The Anvil is the Bible. The Hammer is the argument. See which one breaks.