Hawking Hawking
The Selling of a Scientific Celebrity
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Prueba gratis de 30 días de Audible Standard
Compra ahora por $24.88
-
Narrado por:
-
Tom Perkins
-
De:
-
Charles Seife
When Stephen Hawking died, he was widely recognized as the world's best physicist, and even its smartest person.
He was neither.
In Hawking Hawking, science journalist Charles Seife explores how Stephen Hawking came to be thought of as humanity's greatest genius. Hawking spent his career grappling with deep questions in physics, but his renown didn't rest on his science. He was a master of self-promotion, hosting parties for time travelers, declaring victory over problems he had not solved, and wooing billionaires. Confined to a wheelchair and physically dependent on a cadre of devotees, Hawking still managed to captivate the people around him - and use them for his own purposes.
A brilliant expose and powerful biography, Hawking Hawking uncovers the authentic Hawking buried underneath the fake. It is the story of a man whose brilliance in physics was matched by his genius for building his own myth.
©2021 Charles Seife (P)2021 TantorLos oyentes también disfrutaron:
Amazing book
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
1) His life is told in chapters each covering a phase of Hawking’s life, but they are arranged in reverse chronological order. So for example we are told about Hawking’s relationship with his first wife at the time of his death. Then their marital difficulties are recounted again to provide context for his second marriage to his nurse, then again when he needs full time nursing, then when we reach the chapter covering their early marriage, and finally again when they meet.
This is not the only subject that is given this treatment, and I cannot understand what was meant to be gained by this unconventional organization.
2) The narrator has a pleasant voice, but often falls into a sing-song cadence, especially when quoting dialog. It reminded me of how someone who isn’t comfortable speaking to children might address an 8 year old.
I got through it because I was interested in the science, but once you reach the later parts of the book (before he was a scientist) there wasn’t anything about physics.
Two Things I Disliked
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.