Editing God

Textual Criticism and Modern Bibles Analyzed

De: Michael D. Fortner

Narrado por: Virtual Voice

(Version 1.4 March, 2023) The KJV Only (KJO) believers accuse modern Bibles of being corrupt because they remove many words and phrases and even whole verses, removing enough text to equal 1st and 2nd Peter, and make many other changes. So the author investigated the issue.

The question he set out to answer was, are the claims of the KJO believers accurate, or are the modern Bibles more accurate than the KJV? The author never expected his investigation to turn into a book, because there are already several books supporting both sides. However, his skill-set is thinking outside the box and figuring things out, as seen in his other books. As such, he has some new insights and surprising discoveries to offer.

The reader will learn that the Greek text of the KJV is not as corrupt as we have been told and that modern Bibles are far more corrupt than you would ever imagine. Westcott and Hort, the creators of the questioned Greek New Testament text, both despised evangelicals and their literal view of Scripture. There are many quotes from them proving their liberal unbelief. Though they were officially Anglican bishops, they were actually secret Unitarians because only members of the Church of England could be college professors or hold a government job. So they kept their liberal unbelief a secret, but it was revealed after their deaths by the publication of their private letters. Their purpose was to produce a liberal Bible that Unitarians, then and today, love.

The advocates for the modern Bible versions want us to believe that all the modern Bibles are the authentic Words of God, even though they are all different. The modern translations pretty much include or leave out what they want, since that was how the Greek master-text was created. It causes people to doubt the reliability of the Bible, and to doubt the truth of Christianity. Apparently, God cannot make up his mind what he wants to say, so he says whatever these "experts" want him to say, and it changes with each new edition of the Greek master-text, and each new translation that comes out.
If you don't like this book you can return the eBook OR the print book to amazon for a full refund.

NOTICE: How John Wycliffe died has been updated.

warning to others.

The first 16 chapters are good and informative, but this guy nukes his own case in chapter 17 and makes chapter 18 feel like a waste of time. He quotes a scholar he has claimed to be untrustworthy to make a point, and uses the very kind of arguments he's spent the whole book complaining about to disprove the very thesis he started with. I've never seen a book make such a dramatic 180 without even realizing it.