Disposable

America's Contempt for the Underclass

De: Sarah Jones

Narrado por: Sarah Mollo-Christensen

“A barnburner of a book.” —The New York Times Book Review

In a compelling blend of personal narrative and in-depth reporting, New York magazine senior writer Sarah Jones exposes the harsh reality of America’s racial and income inequality and the devastating impact of the pandemic on our nation’s most vulnerable people.

In the tradition of Matthew Desmond’s Evicted and Andrea Elliot’s Invisible Child, Disposable is a poignant exploration of America’s underclass, left vulnerable by systemic racism and capitalism. Here, Sarah Jones delves into the lives of the essential workers, seniors, and people with disabilities who were disproportionately affected by COVID-19—not due to their age or profession, but because of the systemic inequality and poverty that left them exposed.

The pandemic served as a stark revelation of the true state of America, a country where the dream of prosperity is a distant mirage for millions. Jones argues that the pandemic didn’t create these dynamics, but rather revealed the existing social mobility issues and wealth gap that have long plagued the nation. Behind the staggering death toll are stories of lives lost, injustices suffered, and institutions that failed to protect their people.

Jones brings these stories to the forefront, transforming the abstract concept of the pandemic into a deeply personal and political phenomenon. She argues that America has abandoned a sacrificial underclass of millions but insists that another future is possible. By addressing the pervasive issues of racial justice and public policy, Jones calls for a future where no one is seen as disposable again.©2025 Sarah Jones (P)2025 Simon & Schuster Audio

Not comparable to Evicted but interesting

If you're looking for Evicted or The Invisible Child (both of which I've read), this book in no way compares. Right from the start, I found myself wanting more. I actually looked to see if the author was a reporter because I felt like any writer with negligible research skills and good interviewing skills could have written this. It's pretty slim on facts or statistics. Heavy on the elderly and elderly people of color and the rest of the "disposables" really get short shift. This makes the stories themselves rather repetitive because it's one older person after another after another.