Defending Alex Murdaugh

Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt

De: Crime and Cask

Narrado por: Virtual Voice

"Defending Alex Murdaugh" Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt, by Crime and Cask is a deep dive into the murder trial that shocked the nation. When Paul and Maggie Murdaugh's tragic story unfolded, many were left confused as to who did it. In this book, Crime and Cask explores the major pieces of evidence against Alex Murdaugh, and questions what we thought we knew about these murders. His theories use the prosecution's timeline, evidence and testimony from the trial to present you with different results based on real-world thinking and experiments.

Crime and Cask made fans with his Murdaugh videos on TikTok. He analyzed the evidence and uncovered serious doubts about Alex Murdaugh's guilt. Each video showed flaws in the case against Alex, and the prosecution's case began to unravel with each new video.

Join Crime and Cask as he goes to Moselle to perform real-world experiments and read his inside-the-courtroom reactions. The book lets you in on his journey and his very convincing ideas about the Murdaugh case, and who really did it and why.

His popular TikTok channel has garnered attention from everyone from his loyal fans to podcasters, to Netflix, to FITSNews, the unapologetic media outlet covering news and politics in South Carolina. "Defending Alex Murdaugh" Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt lets you explore a whole new theory about what really could have happened on June 7th, 2021.

This book will grab your attention as it makes you rethink everything you thought you knew about the confusing Murdaugh case. If you're into true crime or just want a fresh take on a real-life mystery that keeps you guessing, "Defending Alex Murdaugh" Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt is a must-read.

Reasonable Doubt? I think so.

I followed the Mudaugh Murders quite closely (from well before the trial, up to this day with the various side-stories that are still unfolding). One thing that struck me about the trial is that I did not see or read about alternate theories regarding who else may have committed the murders. This book does a decent job presenting the case as we know it and introducing enough elements into it that were not presented or explored at trial that a compelling argument could be made that the full story has yet to be told.

For those interested in this case this book is worth listening to. Whether or not you may agree with the author's alternate theory of the crime, you will have to admit that some level of reasonable doubt has been raised that you may conclude the author's theory has merit.