CHURCH SUCCESSIONISM Audiolibro Por Guillermo Santamaria arte de portada

CHURCH SUCCESSIONISM

Muestra de Voz Virtual

$0.00 por los primeros 30 días

Prueba por $0.00
Escucha audiolibros, podcasts y Audible Originals con Audible Plus por un precio mensual bajo.
Escucha en cualquier momento y en cualquier lugar en tus dispositivos con la aplicación gratuita Audible.
Los suscriptores por primera vez de Audible Plus obtienen su primer mes gratis. Cancela la suscripción en cualquier momento.

CHURCH SUCCESSIONISM

De: Guillermo Santamaria
Narrado por: Virtual Voice
Prueba por $0.00

Escucha con la prueba gratis de Plus

Compra ahora por $3.99

Compra ahora por $3.99

OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO. Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes. Obtén esta oferta.
Background images

Este título utiliza narración de voz virtual

Voz Virtual es una narración generada por computadora para audiolibros..

Summary

The book explores competing theories of church succession, with a focus on Landmark Baptists and Old School/Primitive Baptists.

  • Landmarkism (Graves, Pendleton, Dayton):
    Claimed only Baptist churches were true churches, preserved through an unbroken visible succession from the apostles. They rejected “alien immersion,” enforced strict closed communion, and refused recognition of non-Baptist ministers. Their logic mirrored Roman Catholic apostolic succession, but framed in Baptist terms.

  • Old School/Primitive Baptists (Beebe, Trott, Dudley):
    Rejected visible succession. The church exists wherever Christ gathers His people and sovereign grace is upheld. Closed communion was practiced, but grounded in doctrinal fidelity, not lineage. They mocked Landmarkism as “Baptist Popery.” For them, succession was spiritual, doctrinal, and remnant-based, not institutional.

  • Comparisons with Roman Catholicism:
    A three-way contrast is drawn:

    • Rome: Succession = bishops.

    • Landmarkers: Succession = Baptist churches.

    • Old School: Succession = truth and Spirit.

  • Historical Critique:
    Landmark “Trail of Blood” claims are dismissed: dissenting groups (Montanists, Donatists, Waldenses, Anabaptists) were not Baptists. Baptists only emerged in the 17th century. Thus Landmark successionism is viewed as a 19th-century identity myth rather than fact.

  • Other Succession Views:
    The document outlines seven main theories:

    1. Catholic/Orthodox (bishop lineage)

    2. Anglican (reformed episcopacy)

    3. Landmark Baptist (Baptist chain)

    4. Old School Baptist (doctrinal remnant)

    5. Reformed Protestant (Word & sacraments)

    6. Anabaptist/Free Church (gathered believers)

    7. Mystical/Invisible (elect across ages)

  • Biblical Basis (Greek terms highlighted):

    • Matt. 16:18 — Christ guarantees the church’s endurance, not institutional succession (pylai hadou ou katischysousin autēs).

    • Matt. 28:20 — Christ’s abiding presence, not paper lineage (meth’ hymōn eimi).

    • 2 Tim. 2:2 — Succession of truth, not offices (parathou pistois anthrōpois).

    • 2 Tim. 1:14 — The Spirit guards the gospel deposit (parathēkē).

    • Rom. 11:4–5 — Remnant preserved by grace (kataleimma).

  • Practical Issues on the Frontier:
    When no ordained minister was present, Old School Baptists taught believers could covenant together as a church. Baptism and ordination were added later as providence allowed, but legitimacy lay in Christ’s presence, not outside authorization.
    Examples: Welsh Tract (1701), Ketocton (1751), South Elkhorn (1780s), Black Rock (1832).

  • Conclusion:
    Landmarkism represents an institutional exclusivism, Old School Baptists a doctrinal-spiritual exclusivism, and Rome a sacramental exclusivism. The apostles themselves saw succession as Christ’s presence and the faithful transmission of the gospel—not institutional lineage.

Cristianismo Eclesiología Teología
Todavía no hay opiniones