Beating the LSAT 2012 Edition
An Audio Guide to Getting the Score You Need
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Exclusivo para miembros Prime: ¿Nuevo en Audible? Obtén 2 audiolibros gratis con tu prueba.Compra ahora por $20.00
-
Narrado por:
-
LearnSmart LLC
-
De:
-
PrepLogic
Law School. Those two little words are probably all you’ve been thinking about since you made the decision to become a lawyer. Good for you! If you’re seriously considering law school, you know that there’s one big hurdle you still have to leap in addition to graduating: the Law School Admissions Test. One of the more troubling questions you probably have on your mind is when - and how - to study for this oh so important test. Well, we have the answer. Whether you’re in the gym conditioning your body, between classes conditioning your mind or on the way to work conditioning your resume, this audiobook is the ticket to a higher score. We’ll show you how to diagram analytical reasoning “games”, manage your speed and accuracy on the multiple choice section and write the best essays. We’ll even show you how to put logical reasoning to bed with an indepth analysis of formal logic and logical fallacies. So, take us with you wherever you go and we promise to get you pumped up and ready for anything the LSAT throws your way!
©2012 PrepLogic, LLC (P)2012 PrepLogic, LLCLos oyentes también disfrutaron:
Would you recommend Beating the LSAT 2012 Edition to your friends? Why or why not?
I would not recommend this book because I'm concerned about the accuracy of the information.How did the narrator detract from the book?
The narrator reads a complicated subject at a speed much faster than the average audio book. This makes it hard to follow some of the complex math problems without constantly rewinding and replaying sections.Any additional comments?
Frustratingly at least one of their answers is incorrect which makes me wonder how many others are incorrect. They set up a problem where students A-G need tutoring. The relevant rules include E & F study together, if D is in writing E is in social studies, C is in social studies, and there is a max of 3 students per subject.The question is if B is in social studies, what could be true?
Well you can cross off all the answers but A for obvious reasons.
And they declare that makes A the only accurate answer.
Except A says D is in writing.
But if D is in writing, E must study social studies, and F must study with E.
That leaves E, F, and B in social studies right? Which works because there is a max of 3.
BUT the rules also say C must be in social studies.
Which puts 4 people in social studies and there is a max of 3. Which means A could not be true unless they changed the global rules, which they did not state.
It calls into question the accuracy of any of the information in this book, when they set up a question with no correct answers, and then declared one correct that was honestly pretty easy to notice was incorrect.
Read too fast, not all answers correct
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Wow... Amazing
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Good listen
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Listen and learn
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Overall good
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.