
Babies by Design
The Ethics of Genetic Choice
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
$0.99/mes por los primeros 3 meses

Compra ahora por $18.17
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
David Wood
-
De:
-
Ronald M Green
Acerca de esta escucha
Already technology enables parents to select some genetic traits for their children, and soon it will be possible to begin to shape ourselves as a species. Countering loud cries of alarm, bioethics expert Ronald Green explains why our fears about genetic engineering are overblown and how we can move forward responsibly to create a better future.
©2007 Yale University Press (P)2007 Yale University PressReseñas de la Crítica
Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Babies by Design
Calificaciones medias de los clientesReseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.
-
Total
-
Ejecución
-
Historia
- James Weisner
- 03-24-21
Strong on the science, weaker on the ethics
This is an accessible and informative book an interesting biological problem.
The author has clearly put effort and thought into the "ethics" aspect, but I feel like he doesn't have the philosophical background to do it justice. For example, he tends to call controversial things "ethically dubious" or that something is "a serious concern" merely because it's unpopular. These are appeals to popularity on the one hand, and avoid confronting uninformed, irrational public opinions using science. I suspect this populist bent is intended to avoid bristling readers with a bias against genetic engineering. I don't agree that watering down is the best strategy here. If I were writing this book, I would have said "some people see this thing as ethically dubious and here's why they're incorrect" and "something has been called a serious concern by people who make the following mistake". Being confrontational is not worse than being disingenuous.
He develops an ethical framework that distinguishes interventions that fight disease from interventions that provide enhancement. This distinction is unhelpful because "disease" and "enhancement" include baggage like status quo bias and naturalness bias. He does better on the topic of safety, where there is an objective medical reality to point to.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña