No Emotional Response to Legal Fictions

This video is for February 28. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.Legal fictions live on Plane B.If you confuse Plane A with Plane B, you get trapped in outrage.And outrage prevents analysis.6) How Legal Fictions Connect to PresumptionNow we enter the Liberty Dialogues battlefield.A legal fiction becomes dangerous when it combines with presumption.Because presumption is the bridge between:allegationandenforcementPresumption allows the system to move forward unless challenged correctly.And this is where many people fail:They argue the wrong thing.They argue:“I’m not a fiction!”“I’m real!”“This is contemptible!”But the system is not asking whether you are metaphysically real.It is asking:“Are you within the statutory classification for this purpose?”So the correct posture is to:identify the classification assertedidentify the definition that allegedly captures youidentify the nexus that allegedly attaches jurisdictionrebut with precision7) Why “Angst” Becomes ProblematicHere is the hard truth.If someone cannot move beyond offense, they become strategically useless to themselves.Because their emotion keeps them stuck at the surface.They keep fighting the idea of fiction, rather than the attachment of fiction.In Liberty Dialogues terms:They fight narrative while the system operates by procedure.And procedure does not respond to indignation.8) Enforcement in Legal Venues: How Fiction Becomes “Real” in EffectNow let’s talk enforcement.Courts and agencies enforce outcomes based on what the forum accepts as operative.That means: A fiction does not need to be “true in nature.”It needs to be “accepted in procedure.”Once the forum accepts:“you are a respondent”“you are a taxpayer”“you are a licensee”“you are an employer”“you are within this regulated class”Then the system can issue effects:ordersjudgmentslienspenaltiesforfeituresrestrictionscompliance mechanismsAnd to the person, it feels like:“They turned a fiction into reality.”But the correct understanding is:They used procedure to produce enforceable outcomes.9) LD Practical Lesson: Don’t Attack the Existence of Fiction — Attack AttachmentThe Liberty Dialogues are not built on yelling:“Fictions are evil.”The Liberty Dialogues are built on questions:Where did it attach?By what definition?Through what conduct or nexus?Under what jurisdiction?Was the presumption properly raised?Was the burden shifted?Was it rebutted?That’s why Liberty Dialogues is so beneficial to us and problematic to the system:The Liberty Dialogues series does not scream.It dissects.10) The Closing: The Mindset ShiftSo here is the shift we must make:Stop reacting as if legal fiction is an insult to your humanity.Start treating it like what it is:A legal mechanism used to classify and administer.Then ask the LD questions.Because your natural reality is not on trial.Attachment is.And if you can learn to separate:what you arefromwhat the forum is treating you as for a limited purpose…you can finally stop being trapped in angerand start operating in strategy.[Pause]That is how you move from outrage to leverage.That is education.That is Liberty Dialogues.

Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe