Can The Same Gift Be Taxed In More Than One Country?

Yes—and this is one of the most common (and misunderstood) risks in cross-border gifting. In this episode, we explain how and why double taxation can arise on a single gift, and why managing that risk is often more complex than for income or capital gains.

🔎 What You’ll Learn in This Episode:

1️⃣ Why Double Taxation Happens With Gifts

Different countries may assert taxing rights over the same gift based on different connecting factors, including:

• Residence of the donor

• Residence of the recipient

• Location (situs) of the gifted asset

When these criteria overlap across jurisdictions, multiple tax claims can arise simultaneously.

2️⃣ Why Gift Tax Is Different From Income Tax

Unlike income tax, treaty protection for inter vivos gifts is very limited.

Most double tax treaties:

• Do not cover gifts at all, or

• Address only inheritances (and even then, incompletely)

As a result, there is often no treaty-based relief mechanism to eliminate double taxation.

3️⃣ The Role of Domestic Law

Because treaty relief is usually unavailable, advisers must rely primarily on:

• Domestic tax law exemptions and credits

• Territorial vs worldwide taxation rules

• Timing, classification, and documentation of the gift

Outcomes can differ significantly depending on how each jurisdiction’s internal rules interact.

4️⃣ European Union Considerations

In some cases, EU law principles—particularly the free movement of capital—may limit discriminatory treatment or allow access to reliefs that would otherwise be denied.

However, EU law does not eliminate double taxation by default and applies only in specific circumstances.

5️⃣ Practical Takeaway

In cross-border gifting:

• Yes, the same gift can be taxed more than once

• Treaty protection is usually not available

• Prevention depends on careful planning under domestic law, not automatic relief

• Early analysis of donor residence, donee residence, and asset location is essential

This episode explains why gift taxation requires jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction analysis—and why assuming “there must be a treaty” is one of the most dangerous mistakes in international estate planning.