Thermonuclear Rikki-Tikki-Tavi: The Parallax War Audiolibro Por Thomas J. Yeggy arte de portada

Thermonuclear Rikki-Tikki-Tavi: The Parallax War

Muestra de Voz Virtual

$0.00 por los primeros 30 días

Prueba por $0.00
Escucha audiolibros, podcasts y Audible Originals con Audible Plus por un precio mensual bajo.
Escucha en cualquier momento y en cualquier lugar en tus dispositivos con la aplicación gratuita Audible.
Los suscriptores por primera vez de Audible Plus obtienen su primer mes gratis. Cancela la suscripción en cualquier momento.

Thermonuclear Rikki-Tikki-Tavi: The Parallax War

De: Thomas J. Yeggy
Narrado por: Virtual Voice
Prueba por $0.00

Escucha con la prueba gratis de Plus

Compra ahora por $3.99

Compra ahora por $3.99

Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes

Background images

Este título utiliza narración de voz virtual

Voz Virtual es una narración generada por computadora para audiolibros..
This book explores how U.S. presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy failed to stand up to Soviet aggression during the early Cold War—despite America's overwhelming nuclear advantage.

In 1953 and 1956, anti-Soviet uprisings in East Germany and Hungary, inspired by U.S.-backed broadcasts (RIAS and Radio Free Europe), were brutally crushed while Eisenhower chose not to intervene. Instead, he prioritized stability in the Middle East and avoided confrontation—even refusing to threaten nuclear retaliation despite having overwhelming strategic superiority. Kennedy’s failures were arguably worse.

By 1961, satellite intelligence had confirmed the Soviet Union’s minimal nuclear capability. Yet Kennedy appeared weak in Vienna and made numerous concessions during the Berlin Crisis. The Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 further revealed U.S. hesitancy. Although America had thousands of warheads and the means to deliver them, Kennedy settled diplomatically—leading Air Force General Curtis LeMay to famously declare, “We lost!”

Was there a moral obligation to act against Soviet oppression in Eastern Europe? Deontologists and Kantians might argue intervention was unethical if it meant civilian deaths—even if those deaths stopped widespread torture, rape, and repression. But casuists might see the U.S. in the role of the bystander, like those who ignored the cries of Kitty Genovese during her infamous 1964 murder.

The question remains: Should the U.S. have done more to protect 200 million people trapped behind the Iron Curtain?
Todavía no hay opiniones