Apostles of Disunion

Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War: Fifteenth Anniversary Edition

De: Charles B. Dew

Narrado por: Mitchell Dorian

Charles Dew’s Apostles of Disunion has established itself as a modern classic and an indispensable account of the Southern states’ secession from the Union. Addressing topics still hotly debated among historians and the public at large more than a century and a half after the Civil War, the book offers a compelling and clearly substantiated argument that slavery and race were at the heart of our great national crisis. The 15 years since the original publication of Apostles of Disunion have seen an intensification of debates surrounding the Confederate flag and Civil War monuments. In a powerful new afterword to this anniversary edition, Dew situates the book in relation to these recent controversies and factors in the role of vast financial interests tied to the internal slave trade in pushing Virginia and other upper South states toward secession and war.

©2016 The Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia (P)2020 Upfront Books

Easy to listen to

I found myself in the middle of the conversation. I felt the anger of the people who lost.

The Death of the “States Rights” euphemism.

I’ve often debated Southern apologists, adherents to the “Lost Cause Myth”. These folks firmly commit to the idea that the reason for Southern secession was the issue of “states’ rights”, not slavery.

This work slams that fallacy fast first into the dust.

It does so with overwhelming documentation provided by the letters and speeches of members of the state secession commissions, those responsible for disunion. Their words are hyperbolic, incendiary, and deeply racist. In no uncertain terms it clearly points out that secession was based on one issue, and one issue only, and that was perceived threats to the institution of slavery in slave states.

Of course there are other documents attesting to this//the articles of secession of various states, sermons, letters, diaries, and news articles. Yet this book alone carries the day.

The book is powerful and disturbing. It should be compulsory reading in every high school history class.

Brutal yet clear

This book does a great job at illustrating the causes of the Civil War and shows details that are often overlooked in education.

Sugarcoating is weakness

By the time I finished Charles Dew’s Apostles of Disunion I had a number of thoughts and questions. My first thought, considering the book’s climax in the new afterword, is how the morality of equality has eroded previous generational commitments to academic objectivity. Of course we know that objectivity was always a lie and that every word spoken or written by any of us is but a symptom; my thought, then, was how normal it is for Mr. Dew to believe, without a shred of doubt, in racial equality, when, unlike the secession commissioners’ mountain of evidence to the contrary, he has nothing on which to base this late-modern religious tenant besides morality.

My second thought was that his book is still a fantastic listen, helped in its cause by Mitchell Dorian’s impassioned narration (Man, why is it that we suffer so many listless narrations, except for those of books seeking to delegitimize the white South? Get a white liberal talking about whites guilty of disobedience to their religion and man oh man the passion flows forth!) Dew has done us all a service by surveying the secession ambassadors’ speeches, for they offer nowhere to hide and no way for one to apologize for their content.

Which leads me to my questions. Yes the commissioners were racist, and deeply so. In fact, it is the depth of their racism that made the civil war a civilizational conflict and a question of the survival of a form of life and it’s attendant norms of thought and comportment. The depth of their racial feeling is also what allows the causes of the war to include states’ rights. Are we allowed to live locally by our own set of values, even if those values are offensive to those living elsewhere and have the nerve to harm the Federal government’s sacred cows?

Yes secession was driven by fears and assumptions of the wretched future that awaited the post-slavery South. Although the speeches that form the basis of this book were delivered to representational bodies and not to the general public, their racial and cultural, more than political or economic, content shows that they were addressed to the public at large. The planters had much to lose, but the speakers seem to be aware that the culture and well-being of Southern men and women was more at stake than the multinational profits of the slave labor system.

But in 2023 we can certainly ask, “Were they wrong?” because Reconstruction certainly manifested most of their fears and assumptions. But what would’ve become of the South without the war? Taking a cue from Dew’s afterword, and in light of the Left’s love of reconstructions, it’s safe to say the war was just an excuse to remake the South in the North’s image.

Yes, it was about slavery in America

Over the last 25 years in histories of the events and people leading up to the US Civil War a good effort to set the record straight. Despite, post-Reconstruction narratives put forth by such organizations as the Daughters of the Confederacy, the Sons of Confederate Veterans, and the KKK historians are shining light on slavery in America and the real cause of the US Civil War. It was not "States Rights (unless it was the State's right to continue legalized slavery,") nor was it "Northern Aggression. Simply, it was slavery that was the cause of the US Civil War. Charles B. Dew clearly shows that the states that joined the Confederate States of America did so not because they were forced, but because they were propagandized by those, in the South, who had a vested economic interest in the use and trade of slaves, and racism. By recitation of speeches given by Secession Commissioners from states like Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina the message was clear enough, if a state did not succeed that state would see the end of slavery, economic collapse, and mixing of the races, with possible subjugation of whites by African-Americans. This is a work of history and while I understand the need to recite the speeches, by the narrator Mitchell Dorian the use of reciting the whole speech in that voice, and not just the key elements made the narrator, at times, sound like Foghorn Leghorn. The book is a work of history and not drama. That said, the author does clearly show that the issues and attitudes of pre-Civil War America certainly play to a segment of the US population even today.

Powerful debunking of Lost Cause nonsense

Excellent research and documentation of the real causes of the Civil War. This book thoroughly debunks neoconfederate Lost Cause myths that somehow the antebellum South was noble or fought for states rights. Slavery and white supremacy caused the Civil War.

Southerners Thought the Civil War was about Slavery

From the start, secessionist leaders defined their struggle as one to preserve the institution of slavery.

Educational

It's a phenomenal book! Based on facts and actual recorded events. Very educational. It should be required reading in highschool.

Racist Take - Leaves our a lot of information

Absolutely disgusted by this incredibly racist take on the Civil War. Of the Civil War information, nothing was patently false, but lies of omission are rampant. The same goes for current headlines used to make divisive racist points. I can’t believe this is required reading for college students. The voiceover actor used a caricature southern accent to make his racist points. I could not be more disgusted. If we are ever going to bridge the racial divide and truly understand the causes behind the Civil War, this is not the way to do it, through lies and hatred.