The country of Gilead is the United States following a massive religious revival and social upheaval. In this bleak future, women are subject to one of five positions: Wives, Econowives, Handmaids, Marthas, and Jezebels. Each position comes with it an element of a loss of self and agency, and a reduction to a piece of property.
Atwood explores well the theming of societal views of property in women. Her use of the restrictive and concealing clothing the handmaids and wives were forced to wear provides a glimpse into the general perception of religiously motivated control of women’s sexuality. The public shaming the rape victims were subject to cemented this concept. A woman who is raped isn’t being robbed of bodily autonomy and subject to a gross personal assault, she is guilty of a lack of modesty, because the only way she could drive a man to want to rape her is through a lack of modesty. One of the great tragedies this book lays bare, is that this attitude of victim blaming is prevalent, even in supposedly more evolved “western” cultures.
Offred’s foray into the Jezebel’s Club show that the over sexualization of women is, in itself, another form of creating property and ownership in women. In this case, it is reduction of women to mere objects of sexual desire, present only for the gratification of men. The sad tale of Moira in the novel presents this. Element well, where she successfully escaped her restricted life as a handmaid, but still failed to gain true bodily autonomy.
These two examples present Atwood’s criticism of the toxic “virgin/whore” dichotomy that exists in perceptions of women. A woman, in the eyes of many observers can only fit into one of those two designations, and, in the end, they are two sides of the same coin.
The element of rape made an additional appearance in the form of the poor guardian who was called a rapist by Aunt Lydia, and it gave the handmaids freedom to collectively take out all of their pent up anger on him. It is possible he did not even commit the crime for which he was accused. In the context of the scene, it didn’t matter. Guilty or not, he represented the entire system oppressing and repressing the handmaids, and they relished in the opportunity to take revenge.
This is further complicated with the understanding that all of the handmaids are victims of rape. They are forced to submit and acquiesce to sex with the commanders from whom one derives their namesake. In sex where one side is given the option to deny consent. That act is rape, state sanctioned rape.
The fact that the Commander does not relish the act, and is, himself, going about it in an act of doing his duty shows how, though this is considered a society that is patriarchal to the extreme, men suffer greatly from this view of women and sex as well.
This book is sobering and haunting, made all the more so in the fact that Atwood performed research, and everything done in the book was done by humans somewhere to other humans. The “historical notes” epilogue (that interestingly and purposefully leaves lots of questions unanswered) reflects well the way academic reflection breeds impersonal detachment to this behavior and these types of events, but they are real things that humans have done to each other and continue to do to each other.
This book should be mandatory reading to maintain the reality of the events described within.
Takes adjusting to; a lot of poetic descriptions.
Reviewed in the United States on September 10, 2021
I devoured all 300 pages in one sitting. Pretty much overnight. I will start by saying it took an adjustment period in order to get over the lack of quotation marks. Perhaps it was to really emphasize the lack of person, the lack of autonomy the various characters had, especially the handmaidens.The book skips in and out of time, between the before and after, as a way of the character coping with her bleak life. She retreats into her past to remember her lost life. She went from being educated with a college degree, wearing flip flops and short shorts, to a full-bodied religious garb and strict religious rights, enforced in a brutal regime of abuse and death to force submission. Even the Wives, the Elite women along side the men, live in repression; they are allowed some luxuries, but still hidden behind a veil, not allowed to read or write, and live mostly like pampered pets.This tells the story of one woman’s life from one of freedom, at the cost of the potential violence of modern, secular men, to being protected and guided under what amounts to slavery. The lack of a produced child is a death sentence.It is dystopian in that many women cannot reproduce due to radioactive spills, fallout, as well as issues such as pollution and climate. Thus the subjugation of women, and those deemed lesser by the Elite. Breeding is a luxury as well as a need of the Elite. They use surrogates, using Biblical teachings as their rationale.Characters are still human though. The Commander is at first a sympathetic curiosity, bonding over forbidden activities such as Scrabble and the reading of forbidden magazines and books. Yet as you get to know him, you are repulsed by his blatant disregard for women’s lives, and his feelings of entitlement to be able to bed different women. His exploitation is no different than the German Soldiers who took Jewish Mistresses; he has all the power to both protect and give substance to her bleak life, as well as the means to utterly destroy her at any point. She is disposable, while he is immune to consequences. It is a take of utter exploitation.Margaret’s poetry voice is strong; it takes an adjustment period to start to understand, and the first 100 pages are rather slow, droll to a point. But like an artist, it starts with the beginning outlines of the picture, of a woman afraid to give more because she is utterly and totally repressed, and slowly colors in with the texture as the woman becomes more brave in her newfound luxuries and escapes.10/10 would read again.
Reviewed in the United States on September 10, 2021
Images in this review
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Johnathan A. Debord
A dark future derived from a dark past
Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2023Barbara S
What kind of world we could be if we stop valuing the diversity of all people
Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2017Top reviews from other countries
JB
Don’t expect a transcript of the TV program
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 29, 2018Mariya Georgieva
Degrading to women
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 27, 2019Carolyn Holmes
Moving, awe inspiring and un-putdownable
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 22, 2017