• Landmark Victory! Debt Collector Did Not Deceive Debtor Who Refused to Give Name

  • Apr 13 2021
  • Length: 13 mins
  • Podcast
Landmark Victory! Debt Collector Did Not Deceive Debtor Who Refused to Give Name By cover art

Landmark Victory! Debt Collector Did Not Deceive Debtor Who Refused to Give Name

Listen for free

View show details

  • Summary

  • A debt collector must verify the identity of a communication
    recipient to ensure a right-party contact while also avoiding a disclosure
    about the existence of the debt to a third-party. Thus, a debt collector
    must, when asked, provide meaningful information about the purpose of
    a telephone call to a third-party – even when the third-party refuses to
    identify herself – without disclosing that the call is an attempt to collect
    a debt.
    In the latest episode of the Debt Collection Drill podcast, Moss &
    Barnett attorneys John Rossman and Mike Poncin are joined by attorney
    Aylix Jensen who elaborates on her recent, complete victory in Federal
    Court establishing that a debt collector did not violate the FDCPA by
    stating it was a “financial services company” calling regarding a
    “personal business matter” to an unidentified individual – the Plaintiff –
    who the Court identified as the correct “customer for the account.”
    Show more Show less
Show more Show less

What listeners say about Landmark Victory! Debt Collector Did Not Deceive Debtor Who Refused to Give Name

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com reviews

Amazon reviews
No Reviews are Available