Ripley’s Game

While this is probably my favorite Highsmith/Ripley novel so far, it is also the most unsettling. She manages - by introducing a new counter-Narrator (Jonathan) - to make Ripley's amorality seem even more fragile and desolate. Jonathan's wife Simone also stands as an interesting counter-spouse to Heloise. Throughout the novel the twisting and sometimes converging tales of Ripley and Jonathan seem like spinning endless images mirrors. Each narrator reflecting the existential, blood-splattered flatness of the other. It was brilliant and disconcerting at the same time.

I was enamored with the first Ripley book. The second one was just ok, but was still entertaining enough to make me wonder what would flesh out in a third book. I am glad I have continued with the series. In this third book, Ripley gets a little more confident and cocksure of what he is. It is a big departure from the timid, manic Ripley in the first book. This book, oddly, has an almost Batman feel to it as he befriends a man and they go after the Mafia. I enjoyed this book and look forward to completing the series.

Only if they're into the series. This isn't a bad book, but it's not terribly compelling either.

The telling of the tale from 2 sides was interesting.

Isn't this a spoilery question? Well, if I had to answer, it would probably be the scene on the train platform (outside the bathroom)

Not really.

It's Ripley... same ole' bumbling through murders mostly clueless and somehow getting away.

I love these books but there are times that the plot is so unbelievable that I get very uncomfortable. I know that Ripley is a sociopath but he takes risks, particularly in this book, that make no sense at all. Killing for reasons that have nothing to do with him and which have no chance for profit or preservation. And yet he is loveable and you identify with him and don't want him to get caught.

Kenerly is my favorite narrator to date. He speaks french, does different accents. His voice is soothing. When he is speaking for women he doesn't do a drag queen voice like some books I've listened to. His performance is invisible with no irritations to remind you that you are listening to a book instead of reading it. I believe he is the reason I have purchased this entire series.

Yes. The first book made a wonderful movie so why not film all of them?

That it wasn't just Tom Ripley anymore - now we have Trevinie to learn about also. I loved that the story is told from two different intersecting points of view.

No clue.

Jonathan. He's not a killer (well, that's debatable). He's a regular guy - a regular guy just like Tom used to be? And it's fun to listen to his torment as he's dragged through the book.

Maybe when Jonathan watched Reeves demonstrate how to use the garrote on the bedpost.

I wasn't sure Highsmith could keep it interesting for a third book, but she did. The two points of view lets us get to know Jonathan and see how he's sucked into horrible things by Tom.

It's crazy but I find myself liking this sociopath! I even become half convinced that he has no other choice but to kill and that the victims deserve it. So far this is my favorite one out of the series but I still have two more to listen to. I can't put them away but find myself listening to them when I should be doing other things.

Spent to much time with other characters. Not as well developed as the first two. One question I thought Tom was a bi-sexual? Maybe I thinking about the movie. Can anyone listen to this book and not see Tom as Matt Damon? In the end Part III is worth the cash or credit. Tom is still one cool B@stard.

It is somewhat disturbing how it is so easy to, not only like a killer, but slip into his mindset and actually justify his murders. As seems to be my custom, I tend to read a series of books backwards--I start with the latest, then work backwards. I love psychological thrillers, and ended up loving these books, but don't really consider them "thrillers". In fact, there isn't much of a plot to the two books I have read; but it is a mind game. And, I suppose that is what Ripley's game is, a life of smoke and mirrors.

I actually thought the series must be written by a Brit, as Ripley seems about as American as Colin Firth. You could possibly rationalize the tea, cheers, calling raincoats "Macks",ending sentences with questions, and all the other "Briticisms" if he were highly born and educated, but not the case. Other Americans seem to always be portrayed more crudely, as one would expect of a British author. Then I did some research on the author, and find that, not only is she from the US, but deceased, having been born in the 20s, I believe.

In spite of it all--the lack of thrilling plot or action, the superficial life of Ripley and his wife, who even sleep in separate bedrooms, and the unlikely portrayal of Ripley as an American--it is totally engaging, and I get lulled into each of the tales, fascinated by the character.

It is too bad the author cannot produce any more of these gems; she could have a good time with some of the modern technology in the stories. I never could get into Dexter; but Tom Ripley is charming.