Professor Jeffrey Burds of Northeastern University delves into the history of espionage in this eye-opening lecture series. The course opens with espionage activity in the ancient world and the Roman Empire and continues with the American Revolution, Age of Napoleon, and American Civil War. Throughout this compelling discussion it becomes evident that spying is not only a never-ending source of fascination but also a major contributor to world history and the development of nations.
©2011 Jeffrey Burds (P)2011 Recorded Books, LLC
This ranks in the top ten percent of the three hundred or so audio books I have heard, probably because it relates to my 28 year career as an intelligence officer in the US Army. Professor Burds is to be congratulated for this outstanding presentation. I am dismayed at the gratuitous one star review posted here with no explanation of the reason for it. Why a person would do such a thing escapes me. Bad reviews are useful only if they have substance. If there were any way for the editors to excise reviews that serve only a destructive purpose, I would urge them to remove the review by F-M, and not to accept such contributions in future.
I look forward very much to Part 2!
This has many very interesting stories about the important role of espionage in history.
I want Part 2!
Brendan Carl Clarke
I'm afraid the presenter is a bit boring. He researched it all well and all but it was a bit on the dreary side. i expected more.
Well I might but I'ma bit put off.
A bit more personality of the voice and a better presentation
I generally likwe modern scholar biut this was a weak offering.
Not really. Mr. Burds' saying Julius Caesar defeated Marc Antony at the Battle of Actium and then saying Julius Caesar changed his name to Augustus makes me wonder what ELSE is factually incorrect with his lectures.
Quit preaching and get your facts straight.
For the casual history buff, there is some new information here that might surprise. But if you are looking for exciting historical stories of espionage--not so much. Certainly the problem with such a history is the covert nature of the work--scholars may not know the most interesting material. There are huge gaps in the presentation. A great deal of Julius Ceasar, a tiny bit on the Middle Ages, then a leap to material about Elizabeth I's court, for example.
Report Inappropriate Content