We are currently making improvements to the Audible site. In an effort to enhance the accessibility experience for our customers, we have created a page to more easily navigate the new experience, available at the web address www.audible.com/access.
Tyrants Should Be Left Free to Tryrannise Their Own People: An Intelligence Squared Debate | []
Play Tyrants Should Be Left Free to Tryrannise Their Own People: An Intelligence Squared Debate

Tyrants Should Be Left Free to Tryrannise Their Own People: An Intelligence Squared Debate

  • Your Likes make Audible better!

    'Likes' are shared on Facebook and Audible.com. We use your 'likes' to improve Audible.com for all our listeners.

    You can turn off Audible.com sharing from your Account Details page.

    OK
  • Regular Price :$8.95

Two ways to buy!

What's Trending in Live Events:

  • Average Customer Rating
  • Overall
    (5)
    Performance
    (0)
    Story
    (0)
 
  • LENGTH
    1 hr and 44 mins
  • RELEASE DATE
    09-26-05
  • AUDIO FORMATS
    About Audio Formats
    2 3 4 Enhanced Audio
 

People who bought this also bought...

Publisher's Summary

Tyrants Should Be Left Free to Tryrannise Their Own People:
Edward Luttwak, Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies of Washington, and Robert Skidelsky, Professor of Political Economy at the University of Warwick and Chairman of the Centre for Global Studies, spoke for the motion.

James Rubin, former Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs under President Clinton, and Ian Buruma, a political and cultural commentator on Asia and the author of The Missionary and the Libertine: Love and War in East and West, spoke against the motion.

The debate, held on September 14, 2005, was chaired by Jonathan Freedland, a columnist for the Guardian who has written extensively on international relations and the dilemmas of intervention.

Intelligence Squared is London's leading forum for live debate, holding regular debates on the crucial issues of the day and inviting the leading intellectual and political lights on the given subject to participate in them. The format of the debates is modeled on the one employed at the Oxford and Cambridge university Unions: a challenging, sharply defined motion; a team of speakers to propose the motion and a like number to oppose it; and a moderator to keep the speakers and the audience in order and force everyone to stick to the issues. After the main speeches and before summation, contributions are asked from the floor: audience participation is a key feature of the occasion, providing a rare opportunity for the public to voice their opinions and to challenge those of the speakers. A vote is taken before the debate begins and then again at the end so as to give a measure, often a very dramatic one, of the extent to which the audience has been swayed by the oratory and arguments of the speakers in the course of the evening.

Don't miss any of the Intelligence Squared debates.

© and (P)2005 Intelligence Squared Limited

What Members Say

Average Customer Rating

4.0 (5 ratings)
5 star
 (2)
4 star
 (2)
3 star
 (0)
2 star
 (1)
1 star
 (0)
Overall
0 (0 ratings)
5 star
 (0)
4 star
 (0)
3 star
 (0)
2 star
 (0)
1 star
 (0)
Story
0 (0 ratings)
5 star
 (0)
4 star
 (0)
3 star
 (0)
2 star
 (0)
1 star
 (0)
Performance
  •  
    Dr. Jonathan Newman Guelph, Ontario Canada 02-26-06
    Dr. Jonathan Newman Guelph, Ontario Canada 02-26-06
    HELPFUL VOTES
    41
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    96
    25
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    5
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Difficult subject"

    Very good debate. They manage to avoid getting bogged down in questions about Iraq. Both sides make good arguments and the audiance adds some good discussion. Worth a listen.

    1 of 1 people found this review helpful
  • Showing: 1-1 of 1 results

Report Inappropriate Content

If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.

CANCEL

Thank You

Your report has been received. It will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.