![The New Yorker, September 5th 2011 (Rebecca Mead, Tad Friend, Ian Frazier) | [Rebecca Mead, Tad Friend, Ian Frazier]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51bWIPwb-FL._SL175_.jpg "The New Yorker, September 5th 2011 (Rebecca Mead, Tad Friend, Ian Frazier) | [Rebecca Mead, Tad Friend, Ian Frazier]")
The New Yorker, September 5th 2011 (Rebecca Mead, Tad Friend, Ian Frazier)
- by
- Narrated by
-
Your Likes make Audible better!
'Likes' are shared on Facebook and Audible.com. We use your 'likes' to improve Audible.com for all our listeners.
You can turn off Audible.com sharing from your Account Details page.
OK
- Regular Price :$5.95Special Offer: Learn how to get this FREE !
What's Trending in Newspapers & Magazines:
- Be the first to like something in Newspapers & Magazines!
-
Average Customer Rating
-
-
LENGTH2 hrs and 12 mins
-
RELEASE DATE08-31-11
-
AUDIO FORMATS
-
Program TypePeriodical
-
PUBLISHER
People who bought this also bought...
Publisher's Summary
In this issue:
COMMENT
"Behind the Curtain", by David Remnick: Libya, Barack Obama, and leading from behind.
THE TALK OF THE TOWN
"Local Hero", by William Finnegan: The best surfer on Long Island.
PROFILES
"Better, Faster, Stronger", by Rebecca Mead: The four-hour world of Timothy Ferriss.
LETTER FROM CALIFORNIA
"Contract City", by Tad Friend: A deadly budget dispute in Orange County.
OUR FAR-FLUNG CORRESPONDENTS
"The March of the Strandbeests", by Ian Frazier: Theo Jansen’s wind-powered sculpture.
THE CURRENT CINEMA
"Noble Creatures", by David Denby: Reviews of Rise of the Planet of the Apes and Chasing Madoff.
Want more of The New Yorker?
Also, listen to audio from The New Yorker Festival readings and panel discussions, recorded live in New York City.
(P) and ©2011 The New Yorker
More from the same
What Members Say
-
C Chestnuthill, MA, United States 09-08-11 Member Since 2004- HELPFUL VOTES
- 53
- ratings
- REVIEWS
- 203
- 59
"Typos in performance"
As with many issues of the New Yorker there are places where the narrator flubs the first take and redoes it. However, they don't bother to edit out the flubbed part. I find this to be both insulting and unprofessional. I also wish they would cut out the very predicable and boring editorials and give us more articles.
1 of 2 people found this review helpful