After a solid intro from Hawkins, Stefan Rudnicki takes over the narrating reins. The effect is an audio program with a compelling ability to anticipate the question taking form in your own brain as you listen, then answer it with clarity and sincerity. That's a feat worthy of admiration.
Hawkins develops a powerful theory of how the human brain works, explaining why computers are not intelligent and how, based on this new theory, we can finally build intelligent machines.
The brain is not a computer, but a memory system that stores experiences in a way that reflects the true structure of the world, remembering sequences of events and their nested relationships and making predictions based on those memories. It is this memory-prediction system that forms the basis of intelligence, perception, creativity, and even consciousness.
In an engaging style that will captivate audiences from the merely curious to the professional scientist, Hawkins shows how a clear understanding of how the brain works will make it possible for us to build intelligent machines, in silicon, that will exceed our human ability in surprising ways.
Written with acclaimed science writer Sandra Blakeslee, On Intelligence promises to completely transfigure the possibilities of the technology age. It is a landmark book in its scope and clarity.
©2004 Jeff Hawkins and Sandra Blakeslee; (P)2005 Audible, Inc.
"[Hawkins's] argument is complex but comprehensible, and his curiosity will intrigue anyone interested in the lessons neurobiology may hold for AI." (Booklist)
"[Hawkins] fully anticipates, even welcomes, the controversy he may provoke within the scientific community and admits that he might be wrong, even as he offers a checklist of potential discoveries that could prove him right. His engaging speculations are sure to win fans." (Publishers Weekly)
I greatly enjoyed On Intelligence. Not only is it well written and easy to get into (at least in most cases), but it introduces a new paradigm for neurological functioning that will probably replace the models most commonly used by engineers, doctors and academics. This new paradigm has the potential to lead to enormous breakthroughs in artificial intelligence and other areas that stand to greatly benefit mankind in general and individuals in particular. This is a truly multi-disciplineary book that I found both entertaining and fascinating.
The theories and data in the book are truly fascinating, but the author’s style and the narration detract from the content.
The main theme contrasts how our minds work with the way computers work. The writer's hypothesis is that no one will ever build an "intelligent" computer using the existing "computational" design structure of computers, even as technology progresses to produce increased computational speed and memory capacity (which, according to the author, have been the traditional, but incorrect, explanations for "artificial intelligence’s" failure to replicate the “true intelligence” of the human mind). The book contains many eye opening examples of things no computer has ever accomplished, but we accomplish easily and quickly with our minds – and others that human minds accomplish in a fraction of a second, but the biggest and fastest computers built to date take hours to "compute" – and it explains why.
But the author’s interesting message suffers from his lack of focus in choosing an audience and writing for that audience. Instead, the book oscillates (in an almost schizophrenic way) between excessive scientific minutia (which seems to have been directed at convincing the scientific community of his credentials, and the validity of his theories); and "talking down" to the average reader (so they'll "get it"). And unfortunately, the style problem is compounded by the narrator’s tone of voice, which makes the writer sound arrogant and condescending. Other authors have proven that scientific data can be presented in an interesting and intelligible way, even to lay audiences. (One obvious example is the light hearted and entertaining style of Bill Bryson in A Short History of Almost Everything.)
In short, while the content of the book is clearly fascinating, I think most readers would enjoy it more if they waited for an Audible abridged version, with (hopefully) a better narrator.
Although Hawkins is almost certainly wrong on certain point, such as his "blank slate" commitment concerning the brains with which we are born and almost annoyingly self-righteous when discussing "consciousness," about which he admits to not being expert but launchs energetically about anyway, the book was wonderfully ease to access. The clarity of explanation concerning what should have been an abstruse subject was a relief. I feel I know much more about the subject than I did before starting. It was well written and even better read by an excellent narrator. Thank you, Jeff!
Mr. Hawkins will be the first to admit this is not a book to explain everything about intelligence but an important first step. He puts forward a rational explanation of how intelligence in man works in practical mechanical terms. It is a theory but he has much to back-up his conjectures. His theory gets the ball rolling for a frank discussion of why, how, and what we really doing in our mind when we think. He avoids general behavior and philosophical musing about the human mind (that we are all to often inundated with on books about intelligence). I enjoyed every bit of it. At the very least you'll enjoy he very different approach to this age old question.
This book is a really great start to addressing the problem of how we humans think. Good job Mr. Hawkins.
Computer Programmer and Worship Leader. Have enjoyed reading since my mom got me hooked on Nancy Drew and Agatha Christie prior to my teen years. My brother got me hooked on audio books after I started having a longer commute to work. Love a variety of genres.
This is really a fascinating book when it comes to the author's theory of how the brain works. I was greatly surprised by his assertion that very few unified theories exist regarding how the brain produces or mainfests "intelligence". It will be interesting to see if the theories offered in this book will stand the test of time, but the observations made regarding pattern recognition seem very true to experience.
There are times that it is hard to visualize the concepts regarding the various "levels" of the cerebral cortex, but the downloadable drawings help a bit.
My biggest criticism of the book is not scientific, but the author's logical inconsistencies when dealing with metaphysics. The author makes it clear that he believes our "minds" and "selves" are nothing more that the functioning of the brain (ie. no "soul" or anything beyond the physical). He makes it clear that he believes that our beliefs about morality are shaped by the "patterns" we grow up with - and that these "biases" can be very counterproductive. He also states that romantic "love" is really nothing more that a complex chemical process that starts in the brain and moves throughout the body.
If the author had stopped there, I would do no more than respectively disagree. However, mere pages later the author states that it is important that we teach our children the "right" values and morals and that we espouse healthy loving relationships in our families. This author is far too smart to be unaware that if what he says is true in the prevous pages, both of these admonitions have no real meaning and are actually at odds with what he just stated.
Overall - fascinating stuff to think about, but realize that the author has a naturalistic bias that he applies consistently when dealing with science, but inconsistenly when addressing the logical conclusions of his scientific beliefs.
BTW - The author's preface was great - he would have made a GREAT reader for the book!!
I enjoyed the content of most of this book. It starts out strong and grabs your imagination, but in the end it gets quite tedious. There is a switch in narrators after the intro. Unfortunately, the site doesn't mention this or give the name. The 'ghost' narrator is one to be avoided in my opinion. He reads the text with a simpering quality to his tone. I would avoid any books read by him, if I only knew who it was.... The book makes reference to figures and publications. The figures can be downloaded from audible, but the quality is laughable. I wonder why the author doesn't provide readable copy. On the whole I was glad to have 'heard' the book.
I enjoy reading fantasy, science fiction, and horror the most. To improve, I read about language, psychology, spirituality, and art. I read about computer science and business for professional reasons.
On Intelligence is written in a very explanatory and interesting way. The examples and problems are the sort that make you think in a deep way, and are great thought exercises.
The topics covered range from psychology to neuroscience to artificial intelligence. I found a lot of the information new, a lot built on previous knowledge, and a lot was the authors unique perspective. The unique perspective was based on scientific reasoning and superb analysis.
I did find myself lost at times in some of the details. My suspicion is that because I didn't view the figures before or while listening to the audio version, I was missing a lot of data. I'll probably listen to this book again in the future after studying further and checking out the figures that are used as examples.
Hawkins shows up with such great credentials - inventor of the Palm, neuroscience researcher - and with such big promises - a model of intelligence. The first real model ever invoked. And, yes, he delivers. But the concept is simple, and perhaps it is earth-shattering to some. But he continually offers very simple examples and extends them to boredom. He could have gone into greater detail, could have offered more complex examples, could have compared small mammalian brains to larger, to humans. To precortical brains. (He does, but like everything else in the book, quite briefly and lightly.)
He debunks Artificial Intelligence (AI) and neural networks, but then his examples of the future possibilities following his model are often already in existence. Maybe formulated in a different manner, but HOW is it different? He also does not address the transformation of the web from a network of links to a data-driven decision-making entity, further along the path of intelligence than AI. This data model has moved voice recognition, one example of failed AI efforts he bemoans in 2005, to a fair level of functional success.
The book just seems tepid. Not the tome that incites you to think and then rethink that I thought and then unthought it might be...
This book was a very exciting listen. On Intelligence was able to explain to me how the brain, neo-cortex in particular, really works. Additionally they, along with Stefan Rudnicki, made this explanation both accessible and pleasurable. I am very impressed and, in my opinion, this is a groundbreaking work and a must read.
There are no listener reviews for this title yet.
Report Inappropriate Content