©1977 Terry Brooks; (P)2003 Books on Tape, Inc.
Thanks to Audbile.com for getting this to us unabridged. Thank god. There is just no point in listening to a book that should be 20 hours, "trimmed" to 3 hours. If this whole series is released unabridged, I'll buy them all.
This book was one of the first fantasy novels I ever read when I was a kid. Listening to it now I find it to be as fun as I remember. Although now that I'm older and wiser, I can't help but notice the blatant Tolkien themes. I'm not talking about stuff found in every fantasy novel but actual parallel story lines. Those who didn't like the book because of this are missing the point that this is simply a great entertaining tale. On another note: Although I thought Scott Brick was an excellent narrator for Robert Littell's "The Company"; he didn't get into the characters for the Sword of Shannara. Roy Dotrice from George RR Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" series would have been better. If you haven't read that series your missing out on the best the genre has to offer.
This is a classic. I'm so pleased its been released at last in unabridged format: When Flick Ohmsford and his brother Shea are visited by the mysterious druid Allanon, their lives change for the worse, as they are hunted across the country by the minions of the evil arch druid and his skull-bearing horde of undead.
While many of the elements in this first book in particular, remind me a bit of Tolkein's classic work, the books have plenty of fun characters. I also really liked the narrator's voice. He did an excellent job! A++++
Like many others I read the Sword of Shannara and the subsequent books in the series many years ago and was happy to see it available in audio format. I have no problems with the similarities of this story to other works of fantasy because there are enough differences in the overall world created by Terry Brooks for this work to stand on it's own merit.
For certain this is typical fantasy fare, the struggle of a heretofore ordinary individual thrust into fighting against the threat of an eternal evil. Scott Brick is an excellent narrator and I am fine with his representation of the characters. I never expected him to present them to me they way I created them in my head so many years ago and his efforts on this series are typical of his work. What I am not fine with is the fact that this book is nothing extraordinary yet it costs twice as many credits as many far superior works of fantasy.
I actualy enjoyed the next 2 books in the series more than this one because after this book Terry Brooks takes things in a more unique direction and those stories are more original. The Elfstones of Shannara for 1 credit is a much better offering than this book for two.
My advice - pick up two better fantasy books for your 2 credits instead of just this one. I am glad that picking up this book allowed me to spend more time with Shea and Allanon; however, if I did not have the bias of my fond memory of reading this book from long ago then I would not feel like those were 2 credits well spent.
Nearly all fantasy books borrow from Lord of the Rings, at least a little. But this book is a blatant rip-off. Were you replace the ring with a sword replace a hobbit with a village idiot, you are 90 percent of the way there.
A village knave finds a relic of immense power and it is the only thing that can defeat the powerful bad guy. But he has to bring it to the distant, evil land far away. Fortunately, he has a somewhat surly wizard companion to travel with him. Along the way, he meets adventuring companions. One of them is a human who is the heir to a kingdom. Oh look, elves and dwarves too. But alas! They are pursued by dark-cloaked wraith-like beings.
Can our humble hobb...err village boy continue on his quest despite being seperated from his able-bodied protectors? Can he throw his sword into the volcano from when... no, wait. Can he stab the big bad guy with it?
I would recommend this story only to someone under the age of 13 who doesn't have the attention span to make it through the Lord of the Rings trilogy. This is the same story, but squeezed into one book instead of three.
I'm a web developer based out of Sacramento, I listen to books while I work, and love audible.
A new writer.
Listened to the next 2 books, thinking it would get better, it does not. I love fantasy, but this has to be the most boring story I have every listened to.
He doesn't stand out in my mind as being really good or really bad, so most likely.
All the whiny ones. Which would be all the heroes but the Druid.
If I had read this when I was 12 I'm sure I would have loved it, but I don't know how any adult can read these books an be entertained by them.
I'd say that if you are new to this genre, you'll enjoy this book. To me --reading it for the first time in the year 2008--seemed like the storyline was too similar to others in this genre. And there were too many convenient coincidences for my taste. I've heard later books are more interesting so I might give them a try.
While not the first author to borrow heavily from Tolkien, Terry Brooks is the first author that I've read that makes it too obvious with Sword of Shannara. The parallels between Sword of Shannara and the Lord of the Rings trilogy are numerous and at times, almost embarassing. Besides Menion Leah and Panamon Creel I didn't find any of the characters very interesting, and none of them were endearing. The narration is great...nothing wrong in that department. But overall, the book proved little else than a lengthy and fairly tolerable distraction--which, I suppose, does have its uses.
Wow, for the first time ever I've found a reader that I actually hate. He gets the tone of the book entirely wrong in nearly too many ways to explain. Here are a few of the highlights:
Most of the time, during dialogue, every character sounds like some snotty stuck-up rich-kid from the "right side of town" talking down to one of the "average folk". In other words, virtually every line is delivered in a condescending tone. It's unbearable.
There is also a tremendous amount of strange, seemingly unnecessary inflection going on throughout the reading. It seems like, possibly, and attempt to "lighten the mood", although I can't tell for sure because it is so strangely delivered. At any rate, it is completely inappropriate for a novel which is largely dark in tone.
Also, the reader appears to mispronounce "Shannara" and "Eventine" rather horribly. Of course, this open to interpretation, but he pronounces them in a way I've never heard anyone else use in discussing the books, so I have some evidence to support my claim....
All in all, I can barely manage to listen to this, not because of the story, but because of the reader.
About the story:
Yes, it is a relatively blatant rip-off of The Lord of the Rings, but it is still a good tale for the young adult reader. The writing is relatively poor, but the story is fun and truly enjoyable. The rest of Terry Brooks' works are not rip-offs, so don't let that put you off.
But for heaven's sake, READ IT yourself, because this reader destroys it completely.
"A Rival to Gandalf"
The story unfolds slowly to begin with - but builds up the characters and lets you get to know a little about them before you are plunged into this new world. Shades of the Nazgul and Fanghorn Forest are also in this story which parallels LOTR like all this genre to some degree. Never the less, it becomes more and more gripping the further you get into the story as you become intimately involved in the characters lives.
Gandalf's alter ego in this book, the Druid Alanon, disappears with regularity, but reappears as necessary and usefully resolves outstanding questions the listener may have in a roundup at the end of the tale. The time passed quickly during this long book, and enjoyably - recommended.
"Very good, but a bit long"
For his first fantasy novel Terry Brooks really went to town with SoS. It is huge. Comparisons with LotR are easily made, but this book has none of the classic feel of LotR. And keeps the folklore to a minimum. I really liked the concept of how the sword works, but you have to wait until the final few chapters of the book to find this out. I don't know if it is the narrator or just the way the book is written. But it did bug me a bit with the repeated use of words like 'undisguised amazement'. And how sudden contradictions are thrown in one after another in battles and other action sequences. These are minor gripes though and if you are ready for a book of epic proportions this will do nicely.
Redo with Steven pacy pleeeeease.
And really bring the characters alive.
The narrators Irish accent is a little to much
The presentation by the narrator was top draw, able to listen whilst doing others things
A truly epic story, had everything from action, suspense to character development for all main characters.
Scott's narration creates a vivid picture from his words, allows you to visualise the world that Terry Brooks created in your mind.
"Basically Lord of the Rings Retold"
Other reviewers have mentioned the similarities between this book and the Lord of the Rings. I would go father and say its basically just the same story with names and locations changed. A bit of a rip-off really but still quite enjoyable if predictable.
I am a long time fan but the narration is wrong so wrong.
Secrets, action, life, and escapism.
Change the narrator -perhaps English.
Not to listen to any more of the series until the narrator is changed.
Why spoil such a fantastic story with inappropriate narration, is there no judging system?
Report Inappropriate Content