In Blackout, award-winning author Connie Willis returned to the time-traveling future of 2060, the setting for several of her most celebrated works, and sent three Oxford historians to World War II England: Michael Davies, intent on observing heroism during the Miracle of Dunkirk; Merope Ward, studying children evacuated from London; and Polly Churchill, posing as a shopgirl in the middle of the Blitz. But when the three become unexpectedly trapped in 1940, they struggle not only to find their way home but to survive as Hitler's bombers attempt to pummel London into submission.
Now the situation has grown even more dire. Small discrepancies in the historical record seem to indicate that one or all of them have somehow affected the past, changing the outcome of the war. The belief that the past can be observed but never altered has always been a core belief of time-travel theory, but suddenly it seems that the theory is horribly, tragically wrong.
Meanwhile, in 2060 Oxford, the historians' supervisor, Mr. Dunworthy, and 17-year-old Colin Templer, who nurses a powerful crush on Polly, are engaged in a frantic and seemingly impossible struggle of their own - to find three missing needles in the haystack of history.
Told with compassion, humor, and an artistry both uplifting and devastating, All Clear is more than just the triumphant culmination of the adventure that began with Blackout. It's Connie Willis' most humane, heartfelt novel yet - a clear-eyed celebration of faith, love, and the quiet, ordinary acts of heroism and sacrifice too often overlooked by history.
BONUS AUDIO: Includes an introduction written and read by author Connie Willis.
Also listen to the first book, Blackout.
©2010 Connie Willis (P)2010 Audible, Inc.
"By the time the three historians and Mr. Dunworthy have unraveled the mystery and arrived at the full-on, three-hanky finale, you’ll no longer be a disinterested observer. Drawn in Willis’s skillful storytelling, you’ll be back in 1941, wondering what’s about to happen next." (The Village Voice)
"Katherine Kellgren's delightful English accent is perfect for the many characters she portrays." (AudioFile)
“As vivid an evocation of England during World War II as anyone has ever written.... You’ll find here a novelist who can plot like Agatha Christie and whose books possess a bounce and stylishness that Preston Sturges might envy.” (The Washington Post)
Blackout and All Clear really constitute a single book. Blackout leaves the reader without any resolution and All Clear has no back story (and hence makes no sense) without Blackout. Ms Willis, in the introduction to All Clear, says as much. However this review is only for All Clear.
Ms Willis seems to have had the goal of telling the story of the British civilian population during World War II and especially during the Blitz and to have used the characters in the book as the vehicle for doing so. In this she has succeeded brilliantly. Although I have read many books about World War II none have really told the story of the British civilians and how they coped with the violence and devastation of the war and especially what living through the Blitz was like. I have a much better idea of what people had to go through as part of their daily lives and what just getting through the day must have been like.
The main characters, however, seem like terribly flawed individuals. They are supposed to be professional historians but act as though they are continually on the edge of panic. At every step they make the wrong choices and assume the absolute worst about what is happening around them. During the hours of listening I wanted to just tell them to "get a grip" and stop acting so stupidly. I was going to title this review "Historians acting stupidly" or "These are professionals?", but the second half of All Clear, where Ms Willis began to put the pieces of the puzzle together, was so well done that I felt the book was rescued from a 3 star rating.
The narration was very well done with many characters having such distinctive voices that I could tell who was speaking without having to be told.
I would recommend this book with the caveat that the reader might want to listen to the two parts of the book separately. Together they are 41 1/2 hours and that was just too much of these characters for me to listen to at one time. Perhaps if I had separated the two parts of the book I would have had more patience with the characters. As it was I ended up having to stop listening to All Clear about half way through and read an entirely different book before I was able to go back to All Clear and finish it. Still, having said that, I must credit Ms Willis with enough misdirection to credit Agatha Christie (who makes a cameo) appearance in this book.
This is a joint review of Blackout and All Clear. They must be considered together as one long novel, as neither one can stand alone. Basically, the books are follow the same concept as "Doomsday Book" and 'To Say Nothing of the Dog", where in 2060 time travel exists, and Oxford University sends historians back in time to observe. Here, our historians are visiting various destinations in World War II, but mostly in London during the Blitz. The length allows the author to pull you deeply into the story and the setting, You really get a sense of what it must have been like to fall asleep in the shelter or the tube station at night listening to the bombs, and then surface in the morning, stop at home if you're lucky (and if your home was still standing) and hurry off to work despite the destruction in whatever neighborhood was hit the night before. I was moved by the story, and I've been drawn into learning more about the Blitz due to this novel. The characters are not perfect. Yes, they sometimes whine, or make foolish choices, or hide things from others that they should reveal. However, they are caught up in a terrifying situation and can be forgiven their mistakes. Connie Willis' time travelling setting needs to be your cup of tea. If you don't want to hear anything about time travel, this is not for you. There is also a "comedy of errors" aspect, involving misunderstanding, mistaken identity, just missing someone at a critical moment, or being delayed at an inconvenient time. It happens a lot, and some people find this repetition annoying. I find it amusing, at least the way Willis does it. For instance, they have time travel in 2060 but no cell phones, so in Oxford there's a lot of running around trying to find people who are running around trying to find other people. You also meet a lot of characters and you don't know where they fit in. You just have to lose yourself in the setting. For most of the second book, I could not put it down. Well worth the credits.
I've listened to a number of Connie Willis' books before and really enjoyed them. My experience with these two books was decidedly more mixed. Much was very enjoyable; however, I got sick of the interminable self-recriminations about whether one action or another had changed history. Also, one character or another would go haring off on some errand and immediately the others would wonder why he/she was late in returning despite the fact that all their experience told them that delays in travel in war disrupted England were business as usual. It also seems to me that time travelers would have standard strategies for making it easy for their retrieval teams to find them. Gawd! Don't we tell our kids to either stay put or go to some previously specified place if lost. These people would have made the task of finding them very difficult indeed.
I guess the main complaint is that the same two or three devices were used to excess. This is one book (or rather one pair of books -- they must be reviewed together as they aren't stand alone books) that lends itself to abridgement -- and I don't listen to or read abridged books! There are extremely tedious passages as they moan about whether or not they have changed history by some action forgetting, of course, that not acting can have ramifications, too.
Still Ms Willis paints a wonderful picture of war time England with only a few major historical mistakes.
If you want a semi-documentary history of WWII London Blitz seen from the point of view of three fictional characters, please read this book.
IF you want a tightly paced, suspenseful novel full of sympathetic, engaging characters trapped in history (as in her previous Doomsday Book), do not read these books.
I loved the previous Oxford Time Travel Historian novels, and was strongly looking forward to the release of these two. I purchased them both before even reading the first one.
They fail miserably as stories. The characters, supposedly intelligent, highly trained time traveling historians, act like idiots with no common sense. The plot is meandering The point of view switches back and forth between characters and timelines and was completely confusing. Entire chapters could have been totally excised with no loss to the plot. She could easily have compacted both books into one. A fabulous, tightly woven, suspenseful novel would have resulted. THAT one I could see winning an award. I'm not sure where all the favorable reviews are coming from. I finished Blackout from sheer perseverance and reluctance to waste so many invested hours without reaching the end, plus I am an inveterate optimist. I could not summon the enthusiasm to read AllClear.
Writer, Reader, Former Bookseller (RIP Borders)
I loved Doomsday Book. Loved it. One of my favorite books of all time.
I enjoyed Black Out.. mostly. Until it abruptly ended halfway through the story line (about the time I started getting bored) and told me to "tune in next week". So I did. Silly me.
All clear was boring from the first line until the point about four hours in when I said "enough!".
The characters are petty, unbelievable, and one dimensional. Their silly daily dramas aren't interesting enough to engage a sewing circle, and the main characters behave like school children. Their dilemmas and schemes are recycled over and over and over-- like from all the back in Doomsday Book. (How many drops have been obliterated or just misplaced... really?) And then they went on and on and on and on, and around and around and around....
The random second chapter where we skip to the end goes beyond foreshadowing to just plain spoiler, and was really just thrown in all slapdash like it was a horrible printing error that just stuck the end in the beginning.
The mythology fell off the rails back in Blackout and is only getting further into the mud in All Clear, in Doomsday, it worked b/c the mythology wasn't the point of the story. But in Blackout/All Clear it has become integral to the story, and now all of its unexplained, unrealistic, quasi-magical, dysfunctional quirks are in the spotlight.
Overall, it had less depth and attention to detail than a piece of flash fiction. Essentially, its an amazing historical account of an often glossed over experience, with some really annoying characters with no direction and even less of a clue getting in the way. Willis is typically a great writer, it just seems like she didn't care this time around, or got lost in research.
Sorry to Alf and Binny, they were the only ones I liked in the end, and would have liked to see what became of them.
I enjoyed hearing how things work out for our heroes and found the ending satisfying. And as with Blackout, the details of wartime London and environs make for interesting listening.
However, this book is easily 25% longer than it needs to be. The early and middle parts are filled with loooong passages in which our heroes agonize over the things they are keeping from one another. After a while, this made me nuts and I wanted to scream at them to stop lying or at least stop ruminating on these lies and just move on already.
I love listening and usually get in at least three hours a day. I like fiction, biographies and medical non-fiction.
I really liked the characters in this book. We came to know and care about many of the people stuck in the London blitz. There was a lot of excellent history, and I think the author did a fabulous job letting us experience the terror of constant bombing, the privation of constant rationing and the courage shown by much of the population.
The cutting back and forth between different centuries and different locations was a little harder to follow in an audiobook than in print.
What made me subtract a star from the overall score was the constant repetition of the same themes - "I'm stuck, no one can rescue me", "I may have changed history" and "I'm not going to tell my friends what's really going on because I don't want them to worry."
The six parts that make up the two books in this series were probably twice as long as they needed to be.
I'm no stranger to, or enemy of, extremely long books, but I do want the story to keep moving. The same thoughts kept running through the characters' heads, and it was tiresome to hear them over and over.
We also got to hear slightly humorous or sarcastic thoughts, almost never voiced, which was also annoying. One character might say, "That's a dangerous job" and another would think "Not as dangerous as rescuing prisoners from Dunkirk".
I wondered why the characters couldn't occasionally voice their thoughts. It also occurred to me that characters, like people, probably only think interesting thoughts a small percentage of the time. Listening to every boring thought that anyone might have in a day is almost torture.
Perhaps this review is more negative than I intend, but I like Connie Willis' work in general, and I liked the characters and theme of this book. If the redundant thoughts were eliminated, I think this would be a great read for lovers of history, sci-fi fans and those looking for an exciting listen.
As a long time Willis fan, I want to give this story a higher rating but I can't. There are several things I find problematic about the story itself, pace being one of them. It does go on far too long, although often in enjoyable ways. It's a fun read but not her best.
However, I can't fault the narrator. As always, Kellgren does an excellent job.
I am a clay sculptor and an art instructor at a community college. I mostly listen to audiobooks while I work in my home studio.
If you're considering All Clear, you've read Blackout already or you need to.
This one is just as good or better. Enjoy.
This book seems like it was written for an adolescent or teenage audience - but regretfully does not deliver the goods - even for that audience.It is repetitive, boring and slow. The protagonists bumble around in the dark repeating errors and themes in a seemingly endless cycle. The characters never develop, showing neither common sense nor worldliness even though they are supposedly experienced time - travelling historians.There were no reasons (other than chasing dollars) to make this a two volume (Blackout and All Clear). In fact the obvious attempt to stretch this tale out into two books is what makes it so bad.the ingredients are there for a good story. It could have been a wonderful novel delivered in about 250 pages. Too bad.
No the genre is great.
The narration was great.
Save your money and your time and do not buy these two books.
good story spoiled by being far too long. really needed editing - cut out repeats and quotations at the beginning of each chapter, which near the end wasn't needed as it was really all one chapter. at this point Katherine kellgrin tried to keep the atmosphere and momentum going but the quotes slowed it down and were irritating.
the characters that stood out for me, apart from the main ones, were the shakespeareian actor sir godfrey and alfie and binnie.
black out leaves you up in the air, all clear pulls all the loose ends together.
"A good story, but repeats its self"
This is my second time listening to both Blackout and All Clear. I really like both books because I like the premise and setting. London during the blitz is well portrayed and Connie Willis can really make you feel like you are there with the characters.
My only problem with the book, and probably the reason it took me almost a year to to read it again, was its repetitive nature. The only suspense comes from the characters inner monogamous. They spend so much time beating them self's down and second guessing everything they do it makes it hard to read.
Half the time I'm rooting for them the other half I'm shouting at them. All the main characters repeatedly take an action then spend the next chapter going over all the consequences and over thinking that 'might' happen as a result. Then the next time they are in a similar situation they do it all over again, followed by the same second guessing.
All the above said, I will read both books again and recommend them both
"Enjoyable story, just don't take it too seriously!"
I really enjoyed this book! It is not the best writing in the world but I enjoyed the characters and the premise enough to forgive cutting the first book off mid-action. There were some mistakes by the author in writing English dialogue but that was less distracting than the reader's fairly poor attempt at English accents; to an English ear there were many mistakes. However, she was a good reader and 'told' the story well. There could have been better character development given the scope of two books but this seemed a little overtaken by the author's want to get the historical facts in there. I would definitely recommend this book with the caveat that it shouldn't be taken too seriously. I really enjoyed the ride for what it was. It was clear the author had spent much time carefully researching the history.
"Second half of 'Blackout'"
This book is really the second half of 'Blackout'. It moves on the story and brings it to a very satisfactory conclusion. The story of the 'time travelling historians' does get a little confusing occasionally, with a need to really listen to some sections to make sure to follow the story. There are again errors in pronunciation peppered throughout the reading - but well worth the perseverence. The final few chapters really finish the book well - the story of Binnie and Alf is heartwarming and adds real character to the book.
A good listen.
This and the precursor novel blackout is an excellent time travel novel with many twists and turns. It can get a bit confusing at times but perseverance pays off in the end. That the main ?heroes? of the story come from the most unlikely source is an interesting twist and as a reader/listener you really want the time travellers to get back home.
One word of advice however, read/listed to the two books consecutively. The storyline is so intrinsic that to have a significant gap between the first and second instalment might be frustrating as you try to remember who some of the lesser characters are.
"Don't buy this before Blackout!"
Not listened yet as the author indicates at the beginning to turn off if not read Blackout.
The Audible details doesn't really indicate that this is required but just says that it is in the same era etc, not that it is part 2 of - 2 parter!
Not a happy bunny now as need to wait until my NEXT credit to get Blackout
before I can continue to this one.
"Almost a 5!"
Listening to tales of war torn London recounted by my Nan when I was a small child, I couldn't help being drawn into this tale of ordinary folk living through the Blitz. In spite of Connie Willis being American and forgiving her a few mistakes on stations & geography, it was very true to the first-hand stories I'd heard. Really brought to life London in the Blitz from a different angle.
Setting the story against the semi Sci Fi backdrop of the 'Net' and time travel gave it an interesting twist that kept me engaged. You get attached to the charachters and want them to get home.
Agree with another review - you must listen to Blackout first to make any sense of it.
There are two reasons it didn't get a 5: -
1). The plot and 'science' behind the net really do get more convoluted than they need to.
and 2). Could the publisher get really radical and employ an actual Brit to read the story?! Brave attempt by Katherine Kellgren and far better than any of my attempts at an American accent, but PLEASE! You have to be really patient to tune out all the strange pronunciations and tune in to the story.
Still worth the patience though.
"I actually shouted at the player in frustration!"
Remember Dick Van Dykes cockney accent? This is the posh version. Terrible pronounciation 'garse marsk' for gas mask 'parsedge' for passage! I gave this a go to see what happened after the abrupt end to part one. It goes on and on and on and on. Summary after summary, recap after recap. I was shouting 'Get on with it' so many times, but being a courier I buy books by the length to fill my time, and stuck it out to the end. It wasnt really worth it. This two book series could easily have been completed in one (shorter) single volume. It's a nice idea but the glaring anomalies keep tripping over themselves and you cannot help laugh at yet another summary explaining something that was proved wrong by the previous summary! This is the first Audiobook that has really annoyed me.
"Good story, under researched, poorly narrated"
This isn't a novel, it's the second half of a novel. Neither part is a complete story that would stand alone. Taking the two parts together makes a good story, but two aspects make it extremely irritating to listen to: There are some glaring errors that will be evident to anyone knows London and its wartime history reasonably well e.g. Embankment station was only so named in the 1970's, and the easiest way from Bart's hospital to St Pauls is on foot, not several miles by taxi! The narrator is an American putting on a 'British' accent - badly. The mispronunciations and stress on the wrong syllables grate. Maybe Americans who don't know London or its history would enjoy it more than this Londoner did.
There are no listener reviews for this title yet.
Report Inappropriate Content