We are currently making improvements to the Audible site. In an effort to enhance the accessibility experience for our customers, we have created a page to more easily navigate the new experience, available at the web address www.audible.com/access .
The Moral Landscape Audiobook

The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values

Regular Price:$23.93
  • Membership Details:
    • First book free with 30-day trial
    • $14.95/month thereafter for your choice of 1 new book each month
    • Cancel easily anytime
    • Exchange books you don't like
    • All selected books are yours to keep, even if you cancel
  • - or -

Publisher's Summary

Sam Harris’s first book, The End of Faith, ignited a worldwide debate about the validity of religion. In the aftermath, Harris discovered that most people—from religious fundamentalists to nonbelieving scientists—agree on one point: science has nothing to say on the subject of human values. Indeed, our failure to address questions of meaning and morality through science has now become the most common justification for religious faith. It is also the primary reason why so many secularists and religious moderates feel obligated to "respect" the hardened superstitions of their more devout neighbors.

In this explosive new book, Sam Harris tears down the wall between scientific facts and human values, arguing that most people are simply mistaken about the relationship between morality and the rest of human knowledge. Harris urges us to think about morality in terms of human and animal well-being, viewing the experiences of conscious creatures as peaks and valleys on a "moral landscape". Because there are definite facts to be known about where we fall on this landscape, Harris foresees a time when science will no longer limit itself to merely describing what people do in the name of "morality"; in principle, science should be able to tell us what we ought to do to live the best lives possible.

Bringing a fresh perspective to age-old questions of right and wrong and good and evil, Harris demonstrates that we already know enough about the human brain and its relationship to events in the world to say that there are right and wrong answers to the most pressing questions of human life. Because such answers exist, moral relativism is simply false—and comes at increasing cost to humanity. And the intrusions of religion into the sphere of human values can be finally repelled: for just as there is no such thing as Christian physics or Muslim algebra, there can be no Christian or Muslim morality.

©2010 Sam Harris (P)2010 Simon & Schuster, Inc.

What the Critics Say

“Sam Harris breathes intellectual fire into an ancient debate. Reading this thrilling, audacious book, you feel the ground shifting beneath your feet. Reason has never had a more passionate advocate.” (Ian McEwan)

“A lively, provocative, and timely new look at one of the deepest problems in the world of ideas. Harris makes a powerful case for a morality that is based on human flourishing and thoroughly enmeshed with science and rationality. It is a tremendously appealing vision, and one that no thinking person can afford to ignore.” (Steven Pinker, Harvard College Professor of Psychology, Harvard University, and author of How the Mind Works and The Blank Slate)

What Members Say

Average Customer Rating

4.5 (2032 )
5 star
 (1318)
4 star
 (463)
3 star
 (181)
2 star
 (44)
1 star
 (26)
Overall
4.5 (1509 )
5 star
 (1014)
4 star
 (313)
3 star
 (119)
2 star
 (41)
1 star
 (22)
Story
4.5 (1538 )
5 star
 (1035)
4 star
 (330)
3 star
 (135)
2 star
 (18)
1 star
 (20)
Performance
Sort by:
  •  
    Brian DURHAM, NC, United States 10-01-12
    Brian DURHAM, NC, United States 10-01-12 Member Since 2016
    HELPFUL VOTES
    3
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    14
    8
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Science _can_ tell us how to live a good life."

    As one of the "Four Horsemen of New Atheism", Sam Harris gets hated on a lot. If you can't take some straightforward, pull-no-punches criticism of religion, you'll probably have some trouble listening to this. Nevertheless, he does a masterful job of outlining a method by which humanity can arrive at an objective measure of morality and human values through science. He admits that some questions are hard--even inanswerable--but his airtight logic demonstrates why science may just be the only objective guide for determining what values are worth promoting and what constitutes morality.

    The author reads the book himself, and his tone is very conserved, conversational, and logical.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Karen New Hope, PA, United States 07-29-12
    Karen New Hope, PA, United States 07-29-12 Member Since 2011
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    5
    1
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Incredible!"
    Where does The Moral Landscape rank among all the audiobooks you’ve listened to so far?

    #1


    Who was your favorite character and why?

    N/A


    What about Sam Harris’s performance did you like?

    He has a brilliant mind.


    What’s the most interesting tidbit you’ve picked up from this book?

    From a scientific standpoint, ethics relates to the well being of sentient creatures.


    Any additional comments?

    This book has changed my view of ethics and the world. It is a must read!

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Jesika Bryn Athyn, PA, United States 07-11-12
    Jesika Bryn Athyn, PA, United States 07-11-12
    HELPFUL VOTES
    3
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    2
    2
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Riveting"
    Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?

    Sam Harris is one of the most important thinkers of our times. This book clearly defines a starting point for fixing the great troubles of our world. I listened to Moral Landscape for most of a 12 hour drive and was riveted, SH is an excellent writer and speaker.

    If I could make one book required reading for all humans this would be the one.


    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Wade T. Brooks Portland, OR, USA 06-25-12
    Wade T. Brooks Portland, OR, USA 06-25-12 Member Since 2010
    HELPFUL VOTES
    78
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    97
    49
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    7
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "One of the best books I've read in years."

    One of the best books I've read in years. Harris describes the current state of the moral landscape and why defining 'human well being' and states of the brain are important in moving the discussion on morals forward. Why as a society we are stuck on all moral values / religious values being equal and not able to openly discuss their relative merits even though we almost all agree that certain things should not be accepted social/moral practices. He goes on to explain how we can use rational, measurable, scientific means to move human culture forward.

    Harris has a Ph.D. in neuroscience from UCLA, and is a graduate in philosophy from Stanford University. As you would expect he backs up his arguments with a number of widely accepted studies in the fields of brain science, human behavior, psychology, sociology and economics.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    ML Carlsbad, California, USA 05-01-12
    ML Carlsbad, California, USA 05-01-12
    HELPFUL VOTES
    5
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    4
    4
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Good book, but often a tough listen."
    What did you like best about The Moral Landscape? What did you like least?

    Really important arguments put forth. When he provides examples, it's more compelling. Tough to grasp some of the material by listening. He's very articulate, but the concepts can get complicated.


    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Victoria Klassen 04-23-12
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    12
    2
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Morals are rational and scientific; not relative"

    Really appreciate this book; taking back morality from the religious. In planting the idea that individual morals and "good" societies can be measured, studied and evaluated based on scientific criteria, Sam Harris fertilizes a discourse that has so far been lacking among secular humanists and new age liberal relativists. Scientists can and should study societies to determine which moral practices are favoured over others. As usual, cogently written, persuasively argued, with clear language.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Gypsy R. 04-07-12
    Gypsy R. 04-07-12 Member Since 2001
    HELPFUL VOTES
    22
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    71
    5
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "so much more than its title"

    This book is so much more than its title, another book that I would re-read regularly. It's almost impossible to read this book if you have preconceived notion of what Morality is or who should define it. Also, if you start the book thinking that Sam Harris is trying to reconcile the differences between science & religion, then you’d be disappointed. He may seem a little more soft-spoken compare to Richard Dawkins, he doesn’t hide his disgust toward scientists who tiptoe around religion when it comes to research findings.

    I always liked the audiobooks that are read by the author, but this was almost an exception to that rule. After the first sentence, I thought I was listening to a very calm Nicolas Cage & that was rather distracting. His voice was also a bit too soothing, given a boredom inducing topic such as “Science & Morality”, if I wasn’t so curious about what he had to say & concentrating on the content, his voice alone would have lulled me to sleep right at Chapter 1.

    Overall, even though some of the arguments are a little repetitive and out of place within the chapter layout, I thoroughly enjoyed learning about his point of view on the matter. I need to digest this material further & re-evaluate my own stand on the issues.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Gary 03-10-12
    Gary 03-10-12 Member Since 2014
    HELPFUL VOTES
    2
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    16
    7
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "A new way to look at religion's claim on morality"

    Very thoughtful book, with very compelling ideas presented in calm but strong crystalline prose.

    I wish others wrote as clearly or tackled hard ideas so well.

    This is a most utilitarian response to the sometime-mean-spririted atheism of other essays. The gist is that we need to foster and embrace a scientific approach to morality and values.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Edward United States 03-05-12
    Edward United States 03-05-12 Member Since 2015
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    2
    2
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Clear, concise, well -reasoned"
    What made the experience of listening to The Moral Landscape the most enjoyable?

    Sam Harris makes a convincing case for using Science as a tool to guide moral choices, based on the simple criterion of human Well-Being. Excellent discussion of Moral Relativism,


    Who was your favorite character and why?

    N/A


    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Enemy O' the State 11-21-11

    Proud possessor of the lowest boredom threshhold in North America

    HELPFUL VOTES
    15
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    20
    3
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    1
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Astonishingly Bad"

    For a book that purports to be one of philosophy, I was astonished how conclusory the author's arguments were. The arguments against the credibilty of "religious" sources for moral teachings amounted to little more than stating that (a) early chapters of the old testament advocated killing your children and slavery (not a peep about the new testament) and (b) many Catholoc priests have been pedophiles. I'm not kidding that's the argument. No one's a fan of child abuse, but you can't dismiss Christianity as a source of moral teaching simply be establishing that certain of its adherents were demonstrably moral failures - can you say ad hominem attack? (For the record, I'm not religious.)
    I never read a word from the author in support of his central argument that ethical and moral rules can be derived from "science." I read nothing associated with the scientific method in this book. I agree with the reviewer who stated that the author's views amounted to a form of utilitarianism. Is that new? Is that somehow science-based? If so, the author never explained how.

    15 of 32 people found this review helpful

Report Inappropriate Content

If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.

Cancel

Thank you.

Your report has been received. It will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.