Since the advent of the printing press and the accurate reproduction of texts, most people have assumed that when they read the New Testament they are reading an exact copy of Jesus's words or Saint Paul's writings. And yet, for almost fifteen hundred years these manuscripts were hand copied by scribes who were deeply influenced by the cultural, theological, and political disputes of their day. Both mistakes and intentional changes abound in the surviving manuscripts, making the original words difficult to reconstruct. For the first time, Ehrman reveals where and why these changes were made and how scholars go about reconstructing the original words of the New Testament as closely as possible.
Ehrman makes the provocative case that many of our cherished biblical stories and widely held beliefs concerning the divinity of Jesus, the Trinity, and the divine origins of the Bible itself stem from both intentional and accidental alterations by scribes -- alterations that dramatically affected all subsequent versions of the Bible.Bart D. Ehrman chairs the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and is a widely regarded authority on the history of the New Testament.
©2005 Bart Ehrman; (P)2006 Recorded Books
"Engaging and fascinating." (Publishers Weekly)
As a historical reference it opens the the discourse to the lay man, as a starting point, a great listen, and the non-biased look at who may and how possibly the shape of the bible has come to us.
Love this book because it gives me more reasons to back up why religion is such a waste of time. Would have given a 5 star, only giving 4 for the Audible version because the reader Richard Davidson is so painful to listen to. I know if I was reading the physical book I would have enjoyed the read better. His voice is rough and he speaks so harshly. It's clear that he is reading rather than just talking to an audience. Other than that, I'm very grateful Dr. Ehrman chose to write this book.
The title says it all. A+ facts to help you destroy any high and mighty fanatic christian.....if you can make it through 3 chapters of the most boring narrator ever.
I wasn't sure what to expect, but felt this was very respectfully written, especially since the author goes to great detail to explain the research he's done & how he has (really) dedicated his life asking the same questions all Christians ask. Very good for someone who is confused about their committment to Christianity.
Ehrman sets things up in the first few chapters in an, "OMG! the New Testament has errors!!!1!!" kind of way. But it is not as big of a deal as he makes it out to be. He uses two major (and well known) changes, as examples of the "thousands of changes" in the manuscripts, as if to say that many of those thousands of changes are of the same major significance, even though they are not.
He does get into a more reasoned study after that though, and this book could serve as a decent introduction to textual criticism. Although like he himself said, some matters of textual criticism are not straight forward, and many scholars disagree on the original readings--so too here, the reader should not take Ehrman's opinions as the final word on any of the specific passages he examines. Some of the manuscript changes he mentions are not even in modern translations, but he includes them in a way that suggests they are still significant errors in our Bibles (maybe they are for those who still hold to the KJV).
A very good resource is the NET Bible which includes a wealth of text critical notes where the translators clearly explain why they chose the readings they did (they do deal with many of the passages Ehrman mentions, except for Hebrews 2:9).
Ehrman concludes that the NT is "not well preserved", but fails to mention that compared to other ancient writings (Homer, Plato, et cetera), the books of the NT are incredibly well preserved.
The text is the most boring, inaccurate, self-serving lecture ever. The reader is a parody of the the worst lecturer ever, only because he didn't write it (the reader's not the lecturer himself, but is playing him on this audiobook). Please, buy any other book. Or just flush a fiver and call it even.
A quick burn in a fire pit would be a definate improvement. Take one egotistical high brow wanna-be author, combine a difficult complex subject, blend in tons of egotistical holier than thou attitude, add a marginal reading and you have this book. Of the 300 books I have purchased here, this is by far the worst waste of money and time.
The Leopard and Winds of War are downloading now
I would never have recorded this
A waste of time and hard earned money
Report Inappropriate Content