We are currently making improvements to the Audible site. In an effort to enhance the accessibility experience for our customers, we have created a page to more easily navigate the new experience, available at the web address www.audible.com/access .
Killing Jesus Audiobook

Killing Jesus: A History [Audiobook]

Regular Price:$20.99
  • Membership Details:
    • First book free with 30-day trial
    • $14.95/month thereafter for your choice of 1 new book each month
    • Cancel easily anytime
    • Exchange books you don't like
    • All selected books are yours to keep, even if you cancel
  • - or -

Publisher's Summary

Millions of people have thrilled to best-selling authors Bill O'Reilly and historian Martin Dugard's Killing Kennedy and Killing Lincoln, works of nonfiction that have changed the way we view history. Now the anchor of The O'Reilly Factor details the events leading up to the murder of the most influential man in history: Jesus of Nazareth. Nearly 2,000 years after this beloved and controversial young revolutionary was brutally killed by Roman soldiers, more than 2.2 billion human beings attempt to follow his teachings and believe he is God. Killing Jesus will take listeners inside Jesus' life, recounting the seismic political and historical events that made his death inevitable and changed the world forever.

© Bill O'Reilly and Martin Dugard (P)2013 Macmillan Audio

What Members Say

Average Customer Rating

4.4 (3592 )
5 star
 (2205)
4 star
 (916)
3 star
 (326)
2 star
 (89)
1 star
 (56)
Overall
4.5 (3186 )
5 star
 (2126)
4 star
 (688)
3 star
 (252)
2 star
 (76)
1 star
 (44)
Story
4.4 (3167 )
5 star
 (1963)
4 star
 (788)
3 star
 (293)
2 star
 (72)
1 star
 (51)
Performance
Sort by:
  •  
    joe NASHVILLE, TN, United States 09-25-13
    joe NASHVILLE, TN, United States 09-25-13 Member Since 2016
    HELPFUL VOTES
    56
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    70
    10
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Fact and Fiction"
    Would you recommend this book to a friend? Why or why not?

    Only someone who is interested in 1st century life... not the life of Jesus from a religious perspective.


    How would you have changed the story to make it more enjoyable?

    O'Reilly makes a lot of assumptions theologically that ultimately negate the possibility (as outlined in his own faith's canon) for salvation and clearly views Jesus as a man who discovers he is God's son rather than Gods soul assuming the flesh of a mortal and subject to its pains. That aint too Catholic Billy.


    Which scene was your favorite?

    I do very much like the historical background of the time period. The politics, historical heroes forgotten in Jewish culture. He lays a great ground work for an understanding of the politics and time of Jesus. BUT, then again is not all that original either because all he is doing is rehashing Josephus in a more modern tone. Actually, the Jewish War is pretty compelling. and this book (in parts) is the abridged form of that book.


    Was Killing Jesus worth the listening time?

    sure...for background history. There is another book on audible that does a great job too...Life in 1st century Jerusalem...or some similar title. It did a better job for giving me a visual feel for the place. Again though, just pay attention to the history and cultural aspects. The religious stuff is all fodder for anyone who has spent a great measure of time studying with scholars and archeologists. For example, Asserting Mary Magdalene was a poor woman and was a prostitute cannot be backed up. We only know that she was cleansed of 'several demons'... that could have been insanity. Assuming history is not writing history. This is were Bill falls short. When he does not have Josephus or or a Roman scholar like Tacitus to fall back on to prove his outlooks... he is writing fiction. Shallow fiction. He treats Mary and Joseph, when Jesus is lost in the temple, as though they, at that point, do fully understand the magnitude of who their child is. This again is a far jump from what any real scholar of the bible would call legit. Its the worst part of the book... and its what the book strives to be about.


    Any additional comments?

    Stick to the facts you can back up Bill. You do a great job with documented history, and culture. Theologically... I am sorry man... you're a 'pin head.' Just my 2 cents and I am welcome to them.

    34 of 59 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Amazon Customer 12-21-13
    HELPFUL VOTES
    17
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    6
    6
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "excellant historal reading"
    If you could sum up Killing Jesus in three words, what would they be?

    a must read


    What did you like best about this story?

    history of the Jews and the roman empire


    What does Bill O'Reilly bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

    his expression and how he read the book . i get a lot more out of it


    Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

    kind of sad really. Hard to believe the cruelty then. Just awful. Makes me realize how lucky we really are.


    Any additional comments?

    Just an all around great history book.

    5 of 9 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Tad Davis 10-15-13
    Tad Davis 10-15-13
    HELPFUL VOTES
    4406
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    1751
    313
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    2529
    11
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Superficial"

    Bill O'Reilly claims to be writing history here, but he really isn't. What he presents is an awkwardly harmonized (and often lightly fictionalized) retelling of the Gospel story, decked out with tidbits gleaned from history and archaeology (for example, the kind of sandals that would have been worn by the Syrian mercenaries who carried out Herod's slaughter of the innocents).

    The scholarship on display here is shallow at best. One key example is O'Reilly's discussion of the authorship of the Gospels. Matthew was written by the tax collector, he says; Mark by John Mark, Luke by the physician Luke, and John by the "beloved disciple," the brother of James son of Zebedee. O'Reilly claims that there is "growing agreement" among scholars as to these attributions. But he couldn't be more wrong, and you needn't go any further than the discussion of the same subject in the notes to the recent revision of the (Catholic) New American Bible to see how wrong he is.

    As a harmonizer of the Gospels, O'Reilly leaves something to be desired. A prime example here is the cleansing of the Temple. In three Gospels, it appears at the end of Jesus' ministry, and helps precipitate the final crisis; in John, the last to be written, it appears at the beginning, and seems to be Jesus' way of launching his challenge. The solution, for O'Reilly? Jesus cleanses the Temple twice. This unlikely version of events is a direct result of his insistence on taking John not as a spiritual meditation on the meaning of Jesus, but as a literally true account by an eyewitness who, in O'Reilly's view, should be given "the last word" about chronology. This flies in the face of virtually every scholar who has written on the historicity of the Gospel of John in the last hundred years.

    Some of his historical digressions are baffling. One of the longer sections in the book is an account of the reigns of Julius, Augustus, and Tiberius Caesar. O'Reilly is clearly in his element here, and relishes the stories of the financial, political, and sexual corruption of Rome. As fascinating as this material is, it feels like padding: really, in a book about Jesus, the point could have been made in a couple of paragraphs.

    As a narrator, O'Reilly is brisk and engaging. He uses his years of experience hectoring people on TV to good purpose. But does he deliver what he claims to deliver in this book? Not by a long shot. He seems blissfully unaware of the massive amounts of scholarship that have focused on how to use the Gospels as historical sources - some of it by eminent Catholic scholars like the Jesuit priest John Meier - and chooses instead to take the Gospels at face value as historical accounts.

    (I know that many people of faith will take issue with my opinion on this. But I think what I've said fairly characterizes recent scholarship on the Gospels. For an authoritative account, check out Bart Ehrman's lectures on "The Historical Jesus" in the Great Courses lecture series.)

    If O'Reilly admitted that he was writing a faith-based account, I wouldn't argue with his approach. But he doesn't; he claims to be following the scholarship, and he isn't.

    Someone once said to Alexander Pope, regarding his translation of The Iliad: "It is very pretty, Mr Pope, but you must not call it Homer." This is very pretty, Mr O'Reilly, but you must not call it history.

    41 of 78 people found this review helpful
  •  
    fla girl 09-22-16
    fla girl 09-22-16 Member Since 2016
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    2
    1
    Overall
    "Did not disappoint"

    The killing of Jesus is very informative straight to the point. It helps the reader understand the chronology of the crucifixion of Jesus. Unbiased information about the people that was involved. Being a firm believer of Jesus, I was relieved to find that it is very factual in every way. Thank you Bill O'Reilly, you have a grateful fan. The killing of Lincoln was written the same way and I was not disappointed in any way. The killing of Kennedy is next on my list.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Joel M. 09-21-16
    Joel M. 09-21-16
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    1
    1
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "This book is horrible."
    What would have made Killing Jesus better?

    It would be better if it was FACTUAL and not based on opinion and conjecture


    Has Killing Jesus turned you off from other books in this genre?

    no


    What didn’t you like about Bill O'Reilly’s performance?

    he does not pronounce words correctly as they are written


    If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from Killing Jesus?

    the whole book would be edited.


    Any additional comments?

    The Bible is the Word of God and is without error.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Jessica Loftus 09-20-16 Member Since 2016
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    4
    1
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Amazing story"

    First me, this solidified a timeliness of what I learned in history class with what I learned in Sunday School.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    John & Sunny Murphy 09-17-16
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    1
    1
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "filled in a lot of gaps in my understanding."

    listened on a road trip. eye opening. will recommend to friends and family yes yes.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Darin Lafon HOUSTON, TX 09-15-16
    Darin Lafon HOUSTON, TX 09-15-16 Member Since 2014

    Kashmir

    HELPFUL VOTES
    0
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    5
    1
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    1
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "another great book in The Killing series."

    I found myself wanting more. Not only more about Jesus but also more about the disciples after his death and during the sightings. Other than that I couldn't stop listening.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    seth 08-25-16
    seth 08-25-16 Member Since 2015
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    11
    7
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Killing Jesus review."

    does an OK job in telling the story....but bill seams to think Jesus turned the money changers tables over twice, and I for one would like to see the research that supports this statement. other than that the book was good.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Jana 08-22-16
    Jana 08-22-16 Member Since 2014
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    6
    1
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "A Great recap ofThe lifeOf Jesus the Christ."

    Although there are many differences in the exact details of the life and
    Times of Jesus, this book gives a good overview of what happened. I liked the references to historians of the times and the scriptural references used. Highly recommended for anyone seeking more knowledge about Jesus of Nazareth.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful

Report Inappropriate Content

If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.

Cancel

Thank you.

Your report has been received. It will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.