A belief in free will touches nearly everything that human beings value. It is difficult to think about law, politics, religion, public policy, intimate relationships, morality—as well as feelings of remorse or personal achievement—without first imagining that every person is the true source of his or her thoughts and actions. And yet the facts tell us that free will is an illusion.
In this enlightening book, Sam Harris argues that this truth about the human mind does not undermine morality or diminish the importance of social and political freedom, but it can and should change the way we think about some of the most important questions in life.
©2012 Sam Harris (P)2012 Simon & Schuster
"Free will is an illusion so convincing that people simply refuse to believe that we don’t have it. In Free Will, Sam Harris combines neuroscience and psychology to lay this illusion to rest at last. Like all of Harris’s books, this one will not only unsettle you but make you think deeply. Read it: you have no choice." (Jerry A. Coyne, Professor of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, and author of Why Evolution Is True)
"In this elegant and provocative book, Sam Harris demonstrates—with great intellectual ferocity and panache—that free will is an inherently flawed and incoherent concept, even in subjective terms. If he is right, the book will radically change the way we view ourselves as human beings." (V. S. Ramachandran, Director of the Center for Brain and Cognition, UCSD, and author of The Tell-Tale Brain)
"Brilliant and witty—and never less than incisive—Free Will shows that Sam Harris can say more in 13,000 words than most people do in 100,000." (Oliver Sacks)
It is well thought out premise. We did not choose our genetics nor our experiences,nor can we control out thoughts or perceptions, so how can our next actions be of our own choosing when our actions are based on who we've become at that moment.
Loved the book, all ready listened to it twice and working on my third.
yes! The fact that sam harris narrated this one himself helps, since you don't miss the stress and emphasis that you might miss reading it yourself.
If you're worried about the short length of the book, don't be. Sam Harris manages to write a coherent, articulate defense of his position without belaboring the point or becoming dull or repetitive. I think it's about the perfect length for the subject.
Ok... I bought this book on the premise of some reviews praising the author for his insight and intelligence.
However, I found the arguments for the authors line of thinking to be failing in substance and content.
Interesting how the author compares seemingly meaningless acts such as muscle movement and other various body activity to moral decisions and actions as all being lumped into one grand idea of being at the mercy of the biological creature for every supposed decision we make.
Overall, I found this book to be very bankrupt in meaning or depth - however thought provoking!
Nothing mind blowing, but a good, concise, & pleasant summary of current psycho-philosophical thinking.
I loved Sam Harris' "The Moral Landscape," and I read his blog and have enjoyed his posts on free will. The book didn't add anything to this very basic synopsis: Free will is an illusion, based on neuroscience, and we can do what we decide but we can't decide what we do. In short, regarding the idea that if you could go back in time, then you could choose differently — no you couldn't. Therefore any hate toward someone for, say, raping you is misplaced. They couldn't have done differently. If anything, you should feel compassion because how would you like to live inside the skin of someone who is a rapist and can't not be a rapist? (Sam is saying this, not me.) The book was fine, and Sam is always engaging but it lacked something special, to set it apart from a compilation of blog posts. I guess I would've wanted more real-world anecdotes and how a society could or should handle the consequences of these antisocial actions differently than it does now. The book didn't help me see how the lack of free will is meaningful in practice for my life or society as a whole. That said, the book is worthwhile if only because there's so little available on audio about this interesting subject. It's a solid brief introduction to determinism.
Whatever your prior opinions may be regarding the subject, it is hard to deny the author's logic and conclusions based on recent functional MRI (fMRI) research. This field is fairly new, but is revealing insights into the human mind that philosophers only a few decades ago could only dream of. Certainly most of the arguments that Harris puts forth are not new, nor does he go into great depth on the details or breadth of fMRI research, but that is not the goal of this book. Instead it is an excellent primer to the topic and will no doubt encourage further study in many. There is little direct discussion of religion in this book. Even if you disagree with the author's opinions on religion put forth in his prior writings, I encourage you to still consider listening to this book. It's well written and he gets right to the point. Also, the author does a good job as narrator; he is neither dry nor overly dramatic. You probably will not focus on his narration style and will instead focus on the content, which is ideal for this type of material. The audiobook is only 1:15 long and only $6.58 (member price)...I suspect most listeners will find it well worth their time and money. I encourage all readers to learn a bit more about fMRI and marvel at what only recently seemed impossible. No doubt it will radically change our knowledge of the human mind in years to come.
In the top three. It is short, to the point, clear and lucid.
When he associated the lack of Free Will with an expansion of morality.
This is fantastic, just like all of the others.
Free Will doesn't exist.
Well done Sam Harris!
great book, but i am a sam harris fan and have many of the same ideas on free will as he does so i am rather bias.
Simply doesn't make sense. The delay in machines picking up neural activity or whatever doesn't justify no free will. Author just says that it does says that it's that simple and then moves on. Makes the whole premise of the book kind of BS and weak. He quickly says it's because scans pick up this or whatever blah blah and that's why there's no free will but that point that he makes there doesn't make sense, he just moves on and speculates but that point that he moves on from is wrong.
A Brave New World
I have no complaints about the "performance".
The pointless assumptions... Guy.
A philosophical book on the nature of consciousness (more than anything). I was hoping for/expecting more of a scientific/clinical look at free will. Maybe my fault for not researching a little more before buying. This just made me feel like I was listening to a long winded college kid, under the influence of the weed and musing about nothing. Maybe I should give it another try stoned?
There are no listener reviews for this title yet.
Report Inappropriate Content