Author and law professor Kevin Gutzman shows that there is very little relationship between the Constitution ratified by the 13 states more than two centuries ago and the "constitutional law" imposed upon us since then. The Constitution guarantees our rights and freedoms, but activist judges are threatening those very rights because of the Supreme Court's willingness to substitute its own opinions for the perfectly constitutional laws enacted by "we, the people" through our elected representatives.
©2007 Kevin R.C. Gutzman, J.D., Ph.D; (P)2007 Blackstone Audio Inc.
Banning flags is like burning books.
I have read or listened to nearly every one of the "Politically Incorrect Guide" series since I first found Thomas E. Woods Jr.'s "Politically Incorrect Guide to American History". While all of these books are good, some are better than others. If I had to pick one for it's historical insight, accurate articulation of ideas and concepts, and fascinating evaluations of legal rulings, it would be Kevin R. C. Gutzman's "Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution". I would consider this book a "must read" for anyone interested in American History or the US Legal system.
As a professor at a law school, I can attest that Mr. Gutzman gets it right! One of the biggest problems with legal education is the case study method. We have lost the history and the spirit of The Constitution and get mired in the self-made law of the SCOTUS. I agree that one way to fix this is to fix our legal education system. The history and interpretation of the cases cited in this book and what they mean to the death of the Constitution makes you cringe. Because its true.
Audio: Excellent. Clear, well-enunciated, easy to understand. The narrator does read fairly quickly. I didn't do much rewinding but due to the interesting subject matter and innumerable cases mentioned I will be listening to this book many times.
Content: EDUCATIONAL. Was there ever a time "The Supremes" didn't legislate from the bench? Did they EVER adhere to the Constitution other than its' legend as perceived "in their own minds"? Sigh. "What hath God wraught?" It's a wonder we retain ANY inalienable rights anymore, but that was the DOI, wasn't it? The subject matter is presented in a manner that holds ones' interest. Since it is a P.I.G. book there is a moderate amount of sarcasm, but only as appropriate. I highly recommend this book for those with a personal interest in either America history or their own future in America.
I expect to listen to this book at least 2 times. The author mentions other books as his sources and I will try to read those next.
I recently developed a casual interest in the Constitution and this book is flipping my mind like nothing before except for when I was studying Calculus. I would recommend it to anybody I know. It is changes my perspective.
I'm a manager of a lawncare crew that listens to audio books when feasible. I have 2 years of business and 3 towards a history degree.
There were many things that have been forgotten about the Constitution, and this book really helps to bring those facts to life.
I have learned a lot listening to Audible Books. Audible brings words on a page to life.
The U.S. Constitution was written and ratified by the founding fathers of America to be a system of government. The whole misguided notion of it being a living document is specious. This book is well worth the time time it takes to listen.
For years, I have been frustrated at the Federal Court's handling of cases that seem to go against what our founding fathers obviously intended. This book opened my eyes to a history of the federal judiciary ignoring our Constitution while at the same time claiming to uphold it.
It's great to listen to a well reasoned argument for a morally bankrupt position. This book, which contains a case for strict constitutionalism, is 100% correct in terms of nominal law (laws on the books) but 100% off-base in terms of natural law (what is right and wrong). If the author had his way, we would still have slavery and we would not be a united country. That being said, the author is absolutely correct in his criticisms of the notion of "constitutional law". Draw your own conclusions from this conundrum. A good read.
Yes - its a must. A third go through will be instructive as well
Eye opening -
The Constitution explained - Beware of judges!!!
A dangerous piece of writing - sets down some pretty challenging precepts. Exciting stuff!!
It is so jampacked with detail of case law and legislation that has affected how we are governed, plus anecdotes concerning the "players", the written word might have been a harder read. I often rewound the tape to reconsider the facts of cases presented, in fact, I've read the book twice.
The federal form of government and our Constitutional rights that were intended and ratified in our Constitution have been under assault since the beginning by those that favored a nationalist or monarchist form of government and through decisions not based on Constitutional law, but by the personal policy of the unelected bench. It's nothing new and must always be defended.
The 14th amendment was not legally ratified.
I do wish it included a timeline of events,
Report Inappropriate Content