This contribution to Oxford University Press’s Very Short Introductions series, written by Peter Singer, concisely reviews Hegel’s life, carefully contextualizing his work, then goes on to comprehensively summarize and discuss the Hegelian canon, delving into the high points of his philosophical ideas and deftly simplifying them for a lay audience.
Christine Williams presents this tidy overview of a vast and complex canon, her light, clear voice lending some much needed levity to the depths of Hegel’s thorny philosophical musings, often considered quite difficult to parse. Williams’ clear diction and careful pacing make this introduction accessible and even enjoyable - no small feat in the philosophical trenches....
Hegel is regarded as one of the most influential figures on modern political and intellectual development. After painting Hegel's life and times in broad strokes, Peter Singer goes on to tackle some of the more challenging aspects of Hegel's philosophy. Offering a broad discussion of Hegel's ideas and an account of his major works, Singer explains what have often been considered abstruse and obscure ideas in a clear and inviting manner.
©1983 Peter Singer (P)2013 Audible, Inc.
The reader of this book sounds as if she is trying to sell you beauty products. Strange combination with the ideas she reads aloud.
its happy ending
The author took a smart approach to explaining the Hegelian philosophical model, starting with the most concrete: Hegel's philosophy of history, and then moving toward his abstract Phenomenology of Mind. I found myself genuinely learning and retaining what I heard.
All of the other Very Short Introduction works by Oxford Press are highly recommended.
Her inflection is not overdrawn, and her ethereal voice is pleasing accompaniment to a difficult work, yet she never overpowers the work itself to become a distraction.
No, but I did listen in about three sittings. It definitely helps if you complete the chapters in one sitting each.
The author has a fairly obvious bias in two major places. Firstly, when introducing the Phenomenology of Mind, he explains his reasoning behind his choice to break from tradition and translate Hegel's "geist" as "mind" and not spirit. He claims that this is to avoid presupposing a religious connotation, and preserve accessibility for non-Hagel scholars, but the translation of "geist" as "mind" is not only breaking with the tradition of translation but I believe going against the school of Anti-positivism in general that Hegel so strongly influenced. The author did, however, address his choice many times and toward the end of the chapter, admit that it would perhaps be more fitting to use "spirit" instead of "mind", but at least the listener is able to more clearly see the ambiguity of the concept as a whole by using the less appropriate connotation. The second instance of bias occurs in the final chapter, "Aftermath". It is a minor note, but understandable when viewed through the author's bias of translation mentioned above. The author speaks of the Hegelian tradition splitting into two groups, the Right Hegelians (who affirmed Hegels beliefs within the Protestant idea of God) and the Left Hegelians (who waged war on religion as a whole, and professed that man is the highest form of the divine. This group later gave way to its own "gospel message", communism.) The author states that "no major thinkers" emerged from the Right Hegelian tradition, which is true but misleading. No major philosophers emerged, but some incredibly important and "progressive" theologians did. The Aftermath chugs on, explaining Left Hegelianism while completely neglecting to mention the impact laid on intellectual giants such as Søren Kierkegaard (arguably the founder of existentialist thought) or Karl Barth. Again, not a particularly large issue, but one to be aware of in the least. Peter Singer did an incredible job, and is a wonderfully gifted author. But Hegel's panentheism and its effects on Protestant theology are not to be ignored.
For what it aspires to do, a very good brief introduction. It could be note exciting. Part of the issue is the narration which at times sounds a tad rote and tired. All said, however: recommended.
Report Inappropriate Content