The world has watched stunned at the bloodshed in Mexico. Thirty thousand murdered since 2006; police chiefs shot within hours of taking office; mass graves comparable to those of civil wars; car bombs shattering storefronts; headless corpses heaped in town squares. The United States throws Black Hawk helicopters and drug agents at the problem. But in secret, Washington is confused and divided about what to do. "Who are these mysterious figures tearing Mexico apart?" they wonder.
What is El Narco?
This book draws the first definitive portrait of Mexico's drug cartels and how they have radically transformed in the last decade. El Narco is not a gang; it is a movement and an industry drawing in hundreds of thousands from bullet-ridden barrios to marijuana-growing mountains. And it has created paramilitary death squads with tens of thousands of men-at-arms from Guatemala to the Texas border. Journalist Ioan Grillo has spent a decade in Mexico reporting on the drug wars from the front lines. His piercing book joins testimonies from inside the cartels with first-hand dispatches and unsparing analysis. The devastation may be south of the Rio Grande, El Narco shows, but America is knee-deep in this conflict.
©2012 Ioan Grillo (P)2012 Audible Ltd
"Grillo’s book is terrific - full of vivid front-line reporting; diverse interviews; a sense of history; a touch of social science; clarifying statistics; and realistic reviews of what might be done to improve things, none of it easy. It is essential reading." (Steve Coll, NewYorker.com)
Is there an award like the Razzie for worst audio performance? Maybe a Nails-On-Blackboard award? A NOBY? If so I would like to nominate Mr. Paul Thornley’s performance in this book.
Although he is a professionally trained actor, I can honestly say I’ve heard more vocal variation and feeling from a prerecorded message than he delivers here.
This book may contain the secrets of the universe but I’ll never know --- it was too painful a listen.
One thing that puzzles me. From the time the narration is complete to the time the book is purchased, how many people listen to it for quality? Three? One? None? None would be my guess for this book because no hearing person could listen to it and say “Yep, this one is good to go”
If I were the author and had spent months researching, writing and re-writing a book that actually made it to publishing and THEN had it swept under the rug by dreadful narration, I’d be more than upset.
Interesting, engaging and well-documented history of Mexican narco-trafficking.
I tried hard to overlook the narration, but it was so distracting that I have to say it ruined the experience, and I gave up. The narrator read a journalistic, non-fiction work as if it were a novel, with a breathless, dramatic voice entirely inappropriate to the genre. To make matters worse, he pronounces many of the Mexican place names and words with a Castillian accent (pronouncing "c" as "th"), then, inexplicably, completely mispronounces some of the most important Mexican Spanish words, even by Castillian standards ("Gualalupe" as "gwadaloop"). I hope this book is recorded by a different narrator so I can try it again.
It is a good history
Not if he read the same way. He finishes every sentence at a whisper. You can have the volume uncomfortably loud so you can hear the whole sentence, or strain to hear the end of the sentence at normal volume.
This is the book I was looking for when I bought "Murder City" and was disappointed with the lack of factual information.
Just this morning the news reported four reporters have been killed by the Zeta cartel in the last week. This book informs the reader about, what, where, and why, to an amazing degree of detail on this frightening and very current state of chaos south of our border. It is tragic and building up into a huge mess that will affect us all sooner or later.
I found it well written, well read and very interesting.
I highly recommend it.
Narrator difficult to follow..sentences start boldly and end in a whisper. Is he trying to add some drama with this tactic?
The introduction, if I had been able to folllow the narrator.
Difficult to hear because of the modulation changes in his voice. I have listened to many Audible books and never have experienced such poor quality.
It is hard to say, I quit trying to listen to the book at the end of chapter 2.
I never knew all this went on.
There wasn't any one main character in this particular book.
The narrator could have added some inflection to his reading and I think his pauses were a little bit too long.
The book is, for the most part, well researched and delivered. However, the author's bias comes through in several areas. This is most notable in his references to the impact of weapons brought into Mexico from the U.S. This is the same trope the left tries all the time so I shouldn't be surprised especially considering that the author is British (their take on this issue being inculcated from birth). There are a few glaring errors (Colorado's Super-Max prison isn't located in a desert, et al) and wild exaggerations that should have been caught.
Overall, the book provides some useful background to the lead-up to the mess Mexico finds itself in currently. It is just that reader may have to hold their proverbial nose through a few parts.
"El Narco" paints an ugly picture of the situation in Northern Mexico. "El Narco" is nuanced, and resists the temptation to blame the situation on any one source or factor. There are a lot of bad guys here, and a few (usually doomed) good ones, with everybody else trying to go about their lives in the shadow of ever-present violence and possible death.
The narrator is pleasant, and handles the material ably. "El Narco" is an enjoyable and informative listen that strives to make sense of a nasty, sometimes perplexing subject, but is unable--and doesn't even attempt--to offer at a remedy.
The introduction implied an exciting read.
I don't think the content would allow for improvement.
No; I thought I would enjoy it for days but it failed to keep me engaged.
The book starts off very interesting, but then rambles on jumping from one political scenario to another making a reader lose interest
Kitchen Confidential by Anthony Bourdain because of the frankness about both the situation, and probably cause I had just listened to that as well right after.
The first 3 chapters
The last chapter
"Narration is awful!"
Arghhhh - I was really looking forward to this coming out on audiobook but alas my expectations were crushed by the appalling narration. Why on earth must the narrator put ludicrous pauses at the end of almost ever sentence. It's incredibly annoying and frankly after about 15 minutes of listening to him I had had more than enough. If there was a way to return a download I surely would. Also - the narrator also like to insert strangely unnatural volume accents on the wrong words. If I were the author I would have vetoed this reading before it went out.
"Comprehensive but irritating"
I wouldn't necessarilly avoid a book penned by Grillo, if was on a subject which really interested me, but I may look elsewhere first. I would definitely NOT listen to another audiobook narrated by Thornley.
I was prompted to get some background on the drug business in Mexico after watching Breaking Bad and I've not read any other books about the subject - organised crime and the drug business don't really interest me so I have nothing to compare it to.
Paul Thornley's narration was lightweight. His breathy, urgent delivery became irritating to listen to after about 10 minutes - to endure it throughout an entire audiobook really detracts from the content.
No, it's not really a book with a 'narrative' since it's more a history of the drugs business. I'd watch Breaking Bad instead. There is material for movies in this book (indeed some of the hisitory it relates have been made into some pretty famous movies), but I'm sure there are more in there. There was no mention of Peter McAleese's failed assassination mission on Pablo Escobar, which would make very interesting viewing.
Grillo's research was detailed, but I found his writing style puzzling at times. He continually refers to cannabis as 'hallucinogenic'; as a British writer he uses American and English terms jarringly and inconsistently - cars have 'trunks' and chess is compared to 'checkers' and lieutenants are pronounced 'loo-tenants', but then he sticks in some British references which would be lost on Americans ('nutjobs'?).
There are no listener reviews for this title yet.
Report Inappropriate Content