Who are we? It's a question humankind has been asking about itself for a long time.
But when we consider ourselves not as static beings fixed in time, but as ever-changing creatures, our viewpoint of human history becomes much more captivating. The question is no longer "Who are we?" but "What have we become? And what are we becoming?
"What makes this new viewpoint possible is the evolutionary perspective offered by biological anthropology, through which we study the evolution, genetics, anatomy, and modern variation of the human species. In this series of 24 captivating lectures, an award-winning teacher and acclaimed scholar delves into the story of how, why, where, and when we became human.
You'll gain a fresh understanding of the forces that have shaped our species, as Professor King synthesizes the best that more than a century of scientific scholarship has to offer across a variety of disciplines, including primate anatomy and behavior - to understand evolution and to learn more about our common ancestor - and molecular anthropology, to gain the insights offered by fossils, ancient skeletal remains, and lifestyle information like cave art and stone tools.
PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying reference material will be available in your Library section along with the audio.
©2002 The Teaching Company, LLC (P)2002 The Great Courses
This is an excellent course. The professor shares a lot of insight into the controversies of this field and her own work with non human primates. She clearly explains the science of evolution and it's terms, like reproductive success ( never look at your children in the same way again! ) I suppose it's hard not to be dated in this field where new discoveries are continually changing our understanding of our origins. If you get this course you'll want to supplement with other material written more recently. There are some books out suitable for the non scientist. At the time of the course they did not know about Neanderthal DNA in modern humans, or the amazing homo florensis. She does anticipate the Neanderthal DNA discovery and it's implications. She is clearly an accomplished researcher and lecturer and if you are interested in this subject this course is a good use of a credit.
I found this to be a nice summation of what you would end up, or at least should end up, getting out of an introductory class to biological evolution. It is also a nice source to refresh yourselves on some of the terms and major points of evolution in respect to biological anthropology. If you have any interest in the subject, it is worth the credit.
Nice tour of the topic which, for me, is an update. I understand that biological anthropology, as a course given to university students, can benefit from being articulated with the specific cultural climate of our time and place(s), but I was a bit annoyed by the space taken up by the Professor's own ideological posturing. This was most prominent in chapters 14&15 (gender issues) and in chapter 19 (racial issues). That being said, Prof. King did manage to contain the damage; while these topics were not treated with all the objectivity one would expect from a scientist, it could have been much worse.
This course is somewhat dated, and it would be awesome if the great courses would make a new version of this. That said, it's an awesome lecture series, that goes into both similarities between primates (and other apes) and humans, what archeology can tell us about our past, and also what modern research can tell us about the influence of genes.. There's so much, it's hard to even sum up. An amazing lecture, I'd recommend any day
When duty whisper low "Thou Must" The youth replies I CAN.
wide view of the subject matter
middle of the road
I haven't heard her other performances, but the information on neanderthals needs to be up dated to modern knowledge.
"Good for a historical perspective - but be careful"
Perhaps, if I knew the friend was aware of more recent genome work. Obviously in a science book we have to expect the material to go out of date, and unlike literature - it matters if we are hearing a period piece. This is a very good course, presented very well and with an engaging style - but - when I came to the author/reader's choices (when a equally weighted evidence argument was available) from Neanderthal onwards, she had come down on the wrong 'side' (based on recent genomics). Not her fault, just a sign that this course is now quite dated because of recent leaps in discovery. It made me question her other decisions and whether I was learning an outdated view.
I did not know much about habilis and erectus before, so that was my favourite part - also some of the sociology of the people (e.g. the Leakey family) making the fossil discoveries (I'm more familiar with Paabo et al.).
Yes, I'd like to hear an update based on the last decade of discveries.
Possibly, but it would more likely be on the Discovery Channel.
As an academic, I don't read (or write) textbooks any more in my area (genomics, bioinformatics) because they go out of date before they are published. I'm not being critical here, I'm just suggesting that a reader should be following up - it really is a good listen but treat it as a snapshot and follow up....
Excellent course which I can recommend to anyone interested in the field. It is comprehensibly and wonderfully presented. Many thanks to the lecturer!
"Read Hrdy also"
great discussions but has crucial perspectives missing. I recommend this but not without also reading Hrdy's Mothernature and Mothers and Others
Report Inappropriate Content