Forensic archaeologist Ruth Galloway is called in to investigate when builders, demolishing a large old house in Norwich to make way for a housing development, uncover the bones of a child beneath a doorway - minus the skull. Is it some ritual sacrifice or just plain straightforward murder? DCI Harry Nelson would like to find out - and fast.
©2010 Elly Griffiths (P)2014 Audible, Inc.
I just love the way Griffiths brought the characters back from book one in the series as old friends. They are people that have been changed by their experiences together in the previous book. Often I find in a series that the main characters are too static as personalities. Not so with this author. Even better, this book continues to develop these interesting, flawed but fascinating people without missing a beat. This installment picks up just months after book one finished. Probably best to start with book one if you are new to the series. The books do build on one another and it is assumed that the reader already knows much detail that is not reviewed. A good thing-- as I dislike a great deal of recap in a series.
The mystery and backstory were as well thought out, engaging and as spooky as they were in book one. It was also funny in spots! I really enjoyed this listen and loved how the whole tale played out. Creepiness, brooding wild sea coast, archeology and history all perfectly intertwine to make a really enjoyable listen. I'm looking forward to the next book in the series. Really good and recommended if you enjoy a good mystery.
Tell us about yourself!
I've listened to all of this series but not in order. Now I await each new episode.
It's easy listening, there's always a mystery, Ruth Galloway is a very independent woman, and there are complicated interactions in a rural setting.
The narration is well done.
Well written, story is excellent, characters realistic. Hoping for many more in the series
Although it was obvious from very early on in the book who the "culprit" was in this book, it was extremely interesting to see how the author brought it to the attention of the characters in the book. She developed it exceptionally well, fitting the responses and thoughts of her characters around it. It is very well written and a joy to read or listen to! I would recommend it to anyone who enjoys a good murder mystery.
the plot and locale kept my interest. Loved Ruth's character as she came across as real though somewhat flawed. Her relationships are complicated but she always manages to stay true to herself. She continually struggles with the values and ideologies of Catholicism, and "born again Christian" as these enter her relationships with family and friends. I feel like I'm learning something about science but never bored with detail.
So many memorable moements, learning about the sex of her baby, sharing it with Nelson, and the final boat scenes. Though I worried about the blows to her head...not just for her sake but for the unborn baby.
Mostly Jane's voice was appropriate for the characters, except I felt Nelson was harsher than necessary. Sometimes made it uncomfortable to listen seemingly "overdone" as I didn't feel his character really was as coarse as Jane made him out to be.
I could have listened to this at one sitting as the story line was compelling. But I also looked forward to taking a break and think about the plot and especially Ruth Galloway who seemed so genuine. She would make a good and trusting friend mainly because she lacked pretention.
I love Elly Griffiths' writing and intend to read all the books she puts out. So happy to have found her. I love the mixing of religion, archaeology, friendship and suspense.
I found the narration to be exquisite, just like the first book in this series. Unfortunately, this book revolves more around the danger to the main character, Ruth, and not any active crime. I found the struggles between the heroes and villains to be a bit contrived since the point of real conflict was several decades old. Will still get the third book, and the first one is a real gem!
Elly Griffiths should be making it to the New York Times best selling list with this series. The characters are engaging, plot twists terrific, and relationship dynamics compelling.
The narrator is just awful. The loud speaking as if in the back ground is beyond annoying and she has absolutely no variation in the characters voices or personalities with exception of the parents who end up sounding like children. Her timing is so off I wonder how in the world she got this job. I read the first book in the series and loved it. I was over joyed to see this in audible. I have never disliked a narrator as much as I do this one. I can't stress enough what a waste of my credit this was. I do listen to audible all the time and this is the first audible book I simply can not finish. I purchased this because other reviews said how good it was. I don't know how it is even remotely possible for anyone to say that unless they love listening to young children with high pitched voices on a play ground.
If nothing else I hope this review will save someone else money or a credit.
Not in audible. Read the book instead.
In the second novel, you learn more about the characters and their relationships. Since I find this bunch intriguing, that's all to the good. I regret the improbable number of near death experiences the protagonist endures, but I find both the story and the characters so unusual and likeable, that I can overlook that trumpery issue with barely a blink.
"A real page turner!"
A great story that has likeable characters and enough twists and turns to keep me listening. Now have the full set of this author and all are good!
"Awful use of 'historic present'"
This is the only Audible title I have bought but been unable to listen to. The story is told in the 'historic present' - which means 'Ruth gets up and walks across the room; she opens the door and then something else happens...'. Perhaps this would be less noticeable if I were reading it on the page, but hearing it was just unbearably irritating. I think it is made worse by the story (at least the part I listened to) being rather banal - the usual use of the historic present is to build tension in specific contexts, telling the story as if it were happening in 'real time' whereas to have it used for everything including tea with her parents just grates and makes the whole thing seem ridiculous.
"Good story bad northern accent"
The story is quite good and interesting and follows on directly from the last one. It's fairly compelling and I listened to it very quickly.
The main character is interesting and the history is good.
The narrator has slightly changed her northern accent in this book and she has got it all wrong, if he comes from Blackpool he should have a Lancashire accent but the reader seems to be doing a really bad impression of a flat Yorkshire accent. I know this may seem pedantic but it's just really bad to listen to especially as he is a prominent character and when all the other accents are much better.
I did like it and I was emotionally involved
Good story and excellent narration. .action speeded up. characters. Becoming more rounded.Skillfully left wanting to hear more
I haven't read these books in order but it doesn't seem to matter. This was a good story and the interaction between characters was fascinating. The narrator read well but some of the accents were a bit off and she doesn't read male voices very well. It seemed a bit odd to have a number of Irish accents in Norfolk, but it didn't spoil the story. The ending was over dramatic but I enjoyed the book.
"Terrible book full of gaping plot holes"
This book is dreadful. The characters are two dimensional and the villains straight out of Scooby Doo. The story arc rests on ridiculous and far fetched 'clues' and the denouement of the 'mystery', such as it is, bears down on you with the subtlety of a double decker bus. To add insult to injury the narrator is shockingly bad at accents and I was irritated by the lead detective from Blackpool having a Yorkshire accent. Unfortunately the female protagonist veers wildly from staunch independent feminist to helpless victim. I also couldn't get over a University lecturer in archaeology having nothing more than a rudimentary grasp of Roman gods.
Elly Griffiths is a brilliant story teller. Living in Norfolk, I recognise the places in her books, which make it come alive.
"A very British 'Bones', ( that is meant in a good"
History, present and intrigue
I don't know of another author with quite the same characters. I suppose Kathy Reichs but that is only because of the reference to bones.
Yes, I have heard Jane McDowell before and I find her voice easy to listen to with good narration, accents are realistic. I am able to distinguish between the characters and thoroughly enjoyed it.
Yes it was and I almost had it on continuously until I'd finished it
Already have her next book, just pacing myself with another style and author before I start my next marathon read.
"A plot that's a tad over the top"
I am working my way through this series and I can now see why this book doesn't seem to score quite as well on the review stakes compared to the previous one. Bearing in mind the police are not always keen to investigate current crimes, I did find it rather hard believe that so much effort and resources would be invested in solving the riddle of this child's bones!
However, whilst the plot does wander off the richter scale - I nevertheless found it a compelling listen. It's incredibly well read in a slow even way that goes with the marshland setting. I am still enjoying the rather more unusual relationship between Ruth/Nelson and will certainly go on to listen to the next book. Like the Susan Hill Simon Serrailler stories, whilst these books stand alone, it seems to me it is better to read in the proper order as there are so many personal issues flowering in the background.
"A comfortable rather than an exceptional read"
The characters were a little flat and the prose just adequate.
Not particularly. I have heard other narrators who would do better.
Report Inappropriate Content