Mr. Shaitana is famous as a flamboyant party host. Nevertheless, he is a man of whom everybody is a little afraid. So when he boasts to Hercule Poirot that he considers murder an art form, the detective has some reservations about accepting a party invitation to view Shaitana's "private collection".
Indeed, what begins as an absorbing evening of bridge is to turn into a more dangerous game altogether.
©1936 Agatha Christie Limited (P)2003 HarperCollins Publishers
Some of Agatha Christie's mysteries are more about characters and some are more about mystery, and this is one of the latter. That's not to say that the characters are poor, only that the mystery itself takes center stage. It's a real whodunnit: A dinner party includes 4 criminals, whom the host claims to know have each gotten away with murder, and 4 sleuths, both professionals and amateurs......and while the 4 criminals are in a room playing bridge, one of them quietly and secretly murders the host. Whodunnit, and how will Poirot figure it out? Keep listening and find out.
Hugh Fraser does a terrific job, as I've enjoyed in the past.
Lots of fun for fans of Dame Agatha
All the scenes with Ariana Oliver ( Agatha Christie making fun of her image)
Hugh Fraser is one reason to listen. He's fabulous !
This book was as wonderful as any other of her tales. I love the way that Poirot referred to this type of murder in a previous book as his "ultimate crime to solve". I don't want to spoil the ending for anyone but it left me somewhat dizzy. The last 30-45 minutes seem to move the action really fast and the ending literally comes out of nowhere.
The only part I didn't care for was when other members of Scotland Yard went to interview people. You didn't know who these officers were and never heard anything about them later on either. It seemed random. I can understand the need to interview the people but why not send one of the characters we already knew? It was like they had a cameo appearance and in a book it just doesn't work the same as a movie.
I may have enjoyed it better if I played bridge. I didn't understand many of the hands that were played during the games. I would have gotten more out of the book if I did.
Yes because of the flow of the plot.
The whole plot was very enjoyable.
Pointe; very enjoyable because of tone of voice.
The mystery has a really i ntriguing setup, and an interesting rollout. It's not one of her most engrossing, but it's certainly worth the listen. On the other hand, Fraser's voice acting in this one is... fine. The characters are less distinctive than usual, Poirot himself is lesss distinctive, and overall, I would have been happier reading the book than listening to it.
I'm open to any book as long as it is true to itself.
If you like Hercule Poirot, you will like this one. It is a good, solid read for when you want something reliable.
Twists and turns.
The plot was a little too far fetched. If I had taken the time to set my mind to just enjoying this mystery as simple entertainment, I would have enjoyed the book more. Sometimes I take fiction too seriously. The book was ok. There is a lot going on and just when you think you know who the murderer is, the plot twists and you start all over again.
Everything, He reads well and does character voices quite well. His Poirot voice is superb.
Report Inappropriate Content