We are currently making improvements to the Audible site. In an effort to enhance the accessibility experience for our customers, we have created a page to more easily navigate the new experience, available at the web address www.audible.com/access.
 >   > 
The Sixties Weren't the Beginning of Sex but the End of Civilisation: An Intelligence Squared Debate | [Intelligence Squared Limited]

The Sixties Weren't the Beginning of Sex but the End of Civilisation: An Intelligence Squared Debate

Laurie Taylor, Professor of Sociology at the University of York, author, and broadcaster; Howard Jacobson, novelist and critic; and Leonie Frieda, translator, historian, and biographer, spoke for the motion.
Regular Price:$8.95
  • Membership Details:
    • First book free with 30-day trial
    • $14.95/month thereafter for your choice of 1 new book each month
    • Cancel easily anytime
    • Exchange books you don't like
    • All selected books are yours to keep, even if you cancel
  • - or -

Your Likes make Audible better!

'Likes' are shared on Facebook and Audible.com. We use your 'likes' to improve Audible.com for all our listeners.

You can turn off Audible.com sharing from your Account Details page.

OK

Publisher's Summary

The Sixties Weren't the Beginning of Sex but the End of Civilisation:
Laurie Taylor, Professor of Sociology at the University of York, author, and broadcaster; Howard Jacobson, novelist and critic; and Leonie Frieda, translator, historian, and biographer, spoke for the motion.

Christopher Booker, author and weekly columnist for the Sunday Telegraph; Rosie Boycott, a regular radio and TV co-host and the first woman editor of a national daily newspaper; and Claire Fox, the Director of the Institute of Ideas, spoke against the motion.

The debate, held on June 21, 2005, was chaired by Joan Bakewell, whose broadcasting career spans 35 years.

Intelligence Squared is London's leading forum for live debate, holding regular debates on the crucial issues of the day and inviting the leading intellectual and political lights on the given subject to participate in them. The format of the debates is modeled on the one employed at the Oxford and Cambridge university Unions: a challenging, sharply defined motion; a team of speakers to propose the motion and a like number to oppose it; and a moderator to keep the speakers and the audience in order and force everyone to stick to the issues. After the main speeches and before summation, contributions are asked from the floor: audience participation is a key feature of the occasion, providing a rare opportunity for the public to voice their opinions and to challenge those of the speakers. A vote is taken before the debate begins and then again at the end so as to give a measure, often a very dramatic one, of the extent to which the audience has been swayed by the oratory and arguments of the speakers in the course of the evening.

Don't miss any of the Intelligence Squared debates.

© and (P)2005 Intelligence Squared Limited

What Members Say

Average Customer Rating

3.8 (25 )
5 star
 (11)
4 star
 (5)
3 star
 (3)
2 star
 (4)
1 star
 (2)
Overall
0 (0 )
5 star
 (0)
4 star
 (0)
3 star
 (0)
2 star
 (0)
1 star
 (0)
Story
0 (0 )
5 star
 (0)
4 star
 (0)
3 star
 (0)
2 star
 (0)
1 star
 (0)
Performance


There are no listener reviews for this title yet.

    There are no listener reviews for this title yet.

Report Inappropriate Content

If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.

Cancel

Thank You

Your report has been received. It will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.