We are currently making improvements to the Audible site. In an effort to enhance the accessibility experience for our customers, we have created a page to more easily navigate the new experience, available at the web address www.audible.com/access .
 >   > 
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Audiobook

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

A good book may have the power to change the way we see the world, but a great book actually becomes part of our daily consciousness, pervading our thinking to the point that we take it for granted, and we forget how provocative and challenging its ideas once were - and still are. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is that kind of book.
Regular Price:$19.95
  • Membership Details:
    • First book free with 30-day trial
    • $14.95/month thereafter for your choice of 1 new book each month
    • Cancel easily anytime
    • Exchange books you don't like
    • All selected books are yours to keep, even if you cancel
  • - or -

Publisher's Summary

A good book may have the power to change the way we see the world, but a great book actually becomes part of our daily consciousness, pervading our thinking to the point that we take it for granted, and we forget how provocative and challenging its ideas once were - and still are. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is that kind of book. When it was first published in 1962, it was a landmark event in the history and philosophy of science. Fifty years later, it still has many lessons to teach.

With The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Kuhn challenged long-standing linear notions of scientific progress, arguing that transformative ideas don't arise from the day-to-day, gradual process of experimentation and data accumulation but that the revolutions in science, those breakthrough moments that disrupt accepted thinking and offer unanticipated ideas, occur outside of "normal science", as he called it. Though Kuhn was writing when physics ruled the sciences, his ideas on how scientific revolutions bring order to the anomalies that amass over time in research experiments are still instructive in our biotech age.

Note: This new edition of Kuhn's essential work in the history of science includes an insightful introduction by Ian Hacking, which clarifies terms popularized by Kuhn, including paradigm and incommensurability, and applies Kuhn's ideas to the science of today.

©1996 The University of Chicago; (P)2009 Audible, Inc.

What the Critics Say

"A landmark in intellectual history which has attracted attention far beyond its own immediate field." (Science)

"Perhaps the best explanation of [the] process of discovery." (New York Times Book Review)

What Members Say

Average Customer Rating

3.8 (479 )
5 star
 (172)
4 star
 (138)
3 star
 (99)
2 star
 (37)
1 star
 (33)
Overall
3.9 (263 )
5 star
 (105)
4 star
 (64)
3 star
 (61)
2 star
 (23)
1 star
 (10)
Story
3.7 (265 )
5 star
 (82)
4 star
 (76)
3 star
 (69)
2 star
 (21)
1 star
 (17)
Performance
Sort by:
  •  
    Eric 05-23-13
    Eric 05-23-13
    HELPFUL VOTES
    35
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    254
    45
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    2
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "The reader makes absorbing info difficult"
    Would you say that listening to this book was time well-spent? Why or why not?

    No, unless you have no other choice. Actually reading this one will be time better spent, that is, at least in regard to this audio version.


    What did you like best about this story?

    This is a very important book in regard to understanding the history and philosophy of science.


    Who would you have cast as narrator instead of Dennis Holland?

    Certainly not Dennis Holland as he does a horrible job. His performance comes off as a cluelessly peppy version of the Captain Kirk parodied in "Family Guy."


    Any additional comments?

    If you want to absorb the info in this book, pick up a print copy.

    0 of 1 people found this review helpful
  •  
    John Saint Clairsville, OH, United States 12-17-11
    John Saint Clairsville, OH, United States 12-17-11

    Gumby

    HELPFUL VOTES
    2
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    19
    3
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    1
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Not going to finish it."

    I put it down 1 hour into it. Counterintuitive. I should have read all of the other reviews prior to purchase!

    0 of 1 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Bob Denny Mesa, AZ 09-23-11
    Bob Denny Mesa, AZ 09-23-11 Member Since 2014
    HELPFUL VOTES
    4
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    20
    2
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Snore, I couldn't finish it"
    What would have made The Structure of Scientific Revolutions better?

    Probably nothing, the theses and topic just wasn't for me. I'm not a philosopher and have little respect for mind benders.


    What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

    Boredom and amazement that people would try to "interpret" science, which is all about pushing aside interpretation and dealing with bare facts and truths.


    0 of 1 people found this review helpful
  •  
    James San Jose, CA, United States 06-25-09
    James San Jose, CA, United States 06-25-09 Member Since 2009

    Give me science, or give me death!

    HELPFUL VOTES
    27
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    381
    6
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    1
    0
    Overall
    "Boring"

    This book is exceedingly boring. The same few anecdotes from history are discussed over and over, but nothing conclusive or provable is discovered. It is richly philosophical, but in the way that puts off a scientific mind and does not inspire curiosity or profound thought. If you like to read science, skip it. If you can't sleep, give it a read.

    1 of 10 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Joan I Tacoma, WA, USA 08-09-09
    Joan I Tacoma, WA, USA 08-09-09
    HELPFUL VOTES
    2
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    1
    1
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    "Over my head"

    This book was advertized as a book that would appeal to all readers, not just those who are scientists. I do not agree. Although I consider myself to be a well educated person who loves reading non-fiction, this book was boring and way over my head, not to mention a waste of money!

    2 of 18 people found this review helpful

Report Inappropriate Content

If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.

Cancel

Thank you.

Your report has been received. It will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.