First published in 1859, John Stuart Mill's On Liberty is an exhaustive exploration of social and civic liberty, its limits, and its consequences. Mill's work is a classic of political liberalism that contains a rational justification of the freedom of the individual in opposition to the claims of the state. Drawing upon the empiricism of John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume, and the utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham, On Liberty defends the representative democracy as the culmination of society's progression from lower to higher stages, even as it recognizes one of the unique dangers of this type of government - namely, the "tyranny of the majority".
Central to Mill's ideology is the harm principle - the idea that individual liberties should only be curtailed when they harm or interfere with the ability of others to exercise their own liberties. Unlike other liberal theorists, Mill did not rely upon theories of abstract rights to support his ideology, but rather grounded his philosophy in ideas of utility.
As relevant to modern audiences as it was to Mill's Victorian readership, On Liberty is an enduring classic of political thought.
Public Domain (P)2011 Tantor
Foundational to modern society, John Stuart Mill's "On Liberty" is an essential text for all free thinkers and lovers of liberty. As important today as in Mill's time, "On Liberty" is a remembrance of the principles of Western society that has allowed us to flourish in life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I recommend this essay to everyone.
In a style very much similar to Adam Smith, Mill is perspicuous in getting a point across in the most elegant manner. The practicalities dealt with in this work is ahead of its time; indeed his doctrine that a state should be a hub of knowledge with the sole purpose of disseminating that knowledge to the masses is a curious precursor to the Internet and other social cyber networks. I recommend it.
Wow! Topical and fresh despite having been written 150 years ago. It's terrific and grows in importance through the explosive last chapter.
Overall, the subject matter was very interesting and informative. The narration, was distracting. The producer chose a reader for the book with a very monotone and strong English accent.
I understand the time and place of the original author. Perhaps, that led to the choice of the narrator. Unfortunately, it was difficult to stay engaged in the book. If the narrator used more diverse intonations and conveyed more emotion, I would have found it easier to stay interested as I listened.
Report Inappropriate Content