In detailing the clash of political philosophies that drove the war's savage engine, Davies also examines how factors as diverse as technology, economics, and morale played dynamic roles in shaping battles, along with the unsung yet vital help of Poland, Greece, and Ukraine (which suffered the highest number of casualties). And while the Allies resorted to bombing enemy civilians to sow terror, the most damning condemnation is saved for the Soviet Union, whose glossed-over war crimes against British soldiers and its own people prove that Communism and Nazism were two sides of the same brutal coin.
No Simple Victory is an unparalleled work that will fascinate not only history buffs but anyone who is interested in discovering the reality behind what Davies refers to as "the frozen perspective of the winners' history".
©2007 Norman Davies; (P)2007 Tantor Media Inc.
"Enormously readable....This will explode all your ideas about the 'Good War.' " (Details)
"This is a self-consciously contrary book, cutting against the grain of much self-congratulatory Western writing since 1945." (London Sunday Telegraph)
"Davies' topical approach judiciously surveys the military, economic and political aspects of the war....His interpretations rest on solid scholarly work." (Publishers Weekly)
Norman Davies previously wrote a textbook in use in entry level university courses about the history of Europe. His persistent theme is that western European history is overemphasized and eastern European history is ignored.
In this book, the scope of the war is presented from the view of the real participants. Davies takes apart the notion that the Germans and Russians were the major participants and chronicles the war from the standpoint of Belarus, Ukraine, Poland and the Baltic countries which were the battleground for most of the war. These countries were either brutalized by Stalin before the war or invaded by the Soviet Union in 1939 after the pact between Hitler and Stalin. The losses of these countries are put in a context of losses of other participants. The Soviet style of fighting is described where the KGB formed blocking battalions which shot anyone who retreated, regardless if the soldier was wounded or out of ammunition. After WWII, any repatriated Soviet POW was imprisoned in the Gulag. Stalin fought civil wars during WWII and the aftermath of these wars is now being played out in places like Chechnya.
Davies does not ignore other theatres of operation or other participants in the war. He assess the fighting ability of the various countries, for instance showing that Britain had an awesome navy but a deficient army.
The book is topical, eg, Davies uses headings like armaments, civilians, aftermath, collaborators, etc.
This is the best book I read in 2007. Do yourself a favor and read this book. It will change the way you view WWII.
Comprehensive coverage of WW2 in Europe. In addition to the standard fare, the author does a nice job comparing and contrasting the Soviet and Nazi repression and atrocities. He also discusses many interesting side issues..from wartime poetry to the experience of Poles who made it from the Gulags to India and then service with the British.
I thoroughly enjoyed this audiobook.
Although little in this volume can be described as revolutionary, there is a great deal of insightful commentary and fresh perspective. The central thesis of the book - that the war in Europe was won chiefly by the USSR ("Saving Private Ryan" notwithstanding), and that the USSR was, in some ways, as bad as the regime it defeated - is probably under-appreciated in the US, but the point does not seem particularly controversial.
Whatever the merits of the book may be, what made it incredibly enjoyable was, without a doubt, the voice of Simon Vance. The tone and tempo of his reading were perfect. The scorn dripping from his voice as he speaks of those treated too generously by history, in particular Stalin (the "monstah"), is nothing short of delicious.
Good book, narrated brilliantly.
A terrific book about WWII in Europe, taken from the prespective of the eastern front. Full of interesting insight into aspects of the war that the US/UK students often miss. Excellent reader that keeps a long book interesting.
This book will open your eyes to realities about the war and the relative sizes of various campaigns and battles. For example The Battle of the Bulge is put in the proper perspective relative to MUCH larger battles in the USSR. This is not revisionist history, which I abhor. This is rather a recalibration of our perceptions of the war in a way that makes our understanding of it all the greater. This book also is very unflattering to Stalin, so don't worry that there is a hidden pro-Soviet agenda here.
This book is for anyone that wants to know the real facts and figures on WWII. Especially the figures.
What a masterpiece that is also extremely well read by the narrator.
Buy it. Unless you do not like (the real) details you will not be disappointed.........
No Simple Victory takes the you beyond The Greatest Generation and Anglo-centric history of the second world war. It looks at the Eastern front and the soviet role. The Nazi Reich was evil but it was not the only evil in the world. This books takes an objective look at all sides and the decisions that were made. There is a particular emphasis on Stalin and the Soviet forces, especially how their conduct was often as bad if not worse than the Nazi's.
History is written by the winners but that isn't always the end of the story, the author looks deeper and tells some uncomfortable truths.
Much of what is said in the book should by now be common knowledge - the barbarity of the Eastern Front and Stalin's and Hitler's crimes. On the other hand, the book is an easy listen and the writing is personal and witty. Simon Vance does an excellent job as a narrator. The organization of the book is somewhat disconcerting, as the author first offers a short synopsis of the war, mainly from the Eastern Front point of view, and then goes on to dissect several aspects of the conflict, sometimes in minute and often repetitive details. The book is full of facts and figures. I bought the paperback edition just for the notes and bibliography. On the other hand, I was bothered by small mistakes that cast doubt of the veracity of some of the sources. For example, Vlasov was hung with 11 others at the Lubyanka, not shot. The Amber Room was at Catherine's Palace at Tsarskoye Selo, not at Peterhof Palace. At any rate, I did enjoyed listening to the book and recommend it to others, in particular those who wish to have a more balanced view of the war.
Such an interesting book and an excellent job of narrating it by Simon Vance. In this book, Norman Davies has no problem looking at the facts and stories to show just how oppressive the Soviet party was. I would recommend this book to any reader (or listener as the case may be) who is interested in a new perspective of World War II history. Well worth the money!
This book was different from any other WWII history I've come across in a number of ways. First is the author's organization of information. Instead of taking a purely chronological approach, Mr. Davies broke out aspects of the war into categories such as geographical and political details, weaponry, generals, etc. Each category was a history in its own right, from its own viewpoint.
Another difference from other histories was his emphasis on the role and character of the Red Army and the USSR. Lots of food for thought, and a new perspective on world events which followed.
This is an excellent book...very informative, well narrated and easily listened to.
Report Inappropriate Content