At the height of the Cold War, JFK risked committing the greatest crime in human history: starting a nuclear war. Horrified by the specter of nuclear annihilation, Kennedy gradually turned away from his long-held Cold Warrior beliefs and toward a policy of lasting peace. But to the military and intelligence agencies in the United States, who were committed to winning the Cold War at any cost, Kennedy's change of heart was a direct threat to their power and influence. Once these dark "Unspeakable" forces recognized that Kennedy's interests were in direct opposition to their own, they tagged him as a dangerous traitor, plotted his assassination, and orchestrated the subsequent cover-up.
Douglass takes listeners into the Oval Office during the tense days of the Cuban Missile Crisis, along on the strange journey of Lee Harvey Oswald and his shadowy handlers, and to the winding road in Dallas where an ambush awaited the president's motorcade. As Douglass convincingly documents, at every step along the way, these forces of the Unspeakable were present, moving people like pawns on a chessboard to promote a dangerous and deadly agenda.
©2008 James W. Douglass (P)2011 Tantor
"The best account I have read of this tragedy and its significance.... But don’t take my word for it. Read this extraordinary book and reach your own conclusions." (Oliver Stone)
I am coming very late to this information. As a Canadian who knew when JFK died, I did not really follow the intrigue over the next many years. This is an amazing history of conspiracy, intrigue, and deception....not the finest example of the USA leadership ...on the part of the CIA. I really appreciated learning about JFK's turn to peace with Russia and Cuba. If he had not been assassinated (by CIA plot) the world would be a different place As a Canadian, I am a strong supporter of my American friends and neighbours ....but it is time to be realistic and take ownership of the issues. The most recent is the incredibly stupid but powerful NRA lobby - get a grip Americans.
the story itself
Conspiracy in America
A great read
As a military professional this was a very difficult read. However, as conspiracy theories go this was one of the most well put together I have come across. I especially like the author's ultimate point - that even if the premise of this book is absolutely true, it serves as a hopeful point to move forward from. Regardless of the book's absolute accuracy (which I contend is impossible to say without a lifetime of personal investigation), there are so many important aspects to the text to make it educational for every American. I especially enjoyed reading President Kennedy's American University speech at the end of the book. This has been the only Presidential speech I have read or listened to from beginning to end - not only once but twice. His message is timeless.
More than anything, this fine work gives historical context amid the detail of the conspiracy to kill our president. It sharply frames a changing leader, becoming an altruistic thinker, shedding his previous thinking and listening to his enemies. The unfortunate result of his peaceful incarnation, as Douglas' work shows, was his downfall as those Kennedy had under him undermined and eventually overwhelmed his idealistic turn.
JFK and the Unspeakable is a fine book which any JFK or JFK assassination enthusiast can enjoy (if one can do so with the subject). It is a new kind of JFK book; a hybrid of historic juxtaposition of Kennedy vs the world against him. I was most impressed that the assassination detail never pandered to the lone assassin theories, as that postulation is so out of date since the declassification of documents in the last 25 -30 years. The overwhelming evidence clearly represents itself. The Oswald double is particularly intriguing....
This book is worth every cent. Hopefully you will enjoy it. warning: the book does not try to solve anything nor break new ground. It simple and elegantly shows a great man becoming greater, cut down by his own supporting elements.
This book was about twice as long as it could have been. There were endless repetitions and backtracks and tangents that really made it impossible to tie the story together. I know this is a complex topic, but it really felt like stream of consciousness a majority of the time, despite that it seemed like there were good references and research that went into the information.
I was disappointed that the part of the case that I am most familiar with, the actual shooting was so inaccurately described. One of the only pieces of concrete evidence we have of what happened that is widely available is the Zapruder film and for the description as to what can clearly be seen to be so inaccurately characterized gave the rest of the book, made up of less concrete recollections, testimonies, other books, redacted declassified reports, etc. a lot less credibility.
Enjoyed the narrator's performance, I did tire of hearing the term "turn towards peace" but that wasn't the narrators fault. Seemed like every sentence started with that phrase.
I stuck with it only because I was interested in the subject matter and hoped it would get better or finally tie things together in the end, I was disappointed.
I don't understand how this book had such rave reviews. First time I have been led astray by Audible reviews. I will have to be more diligent.
(To quote La Dolce Vita) Love, Love, and Love. That is a little silly or sentimental... probably both, but in truth it is a very loving and compassionate portrait that Douglass paints of a man who had, I think this is virtually certain today, turned towards a more peaceful solution to many domestic and global problems. Douglass, whether you agree with the turning concept or like Jim DiEugenio you believe JFK was never truly a cold warrior after his 1951 sojourn, aptly demonstrates key policy points of the short and often misunderstood Kennedy presidency, the reasons that these decisions were good for almost everyone EXCEPT the Military Industrial Congressional CIA Establishment Clusterfuck Conspiracy Complex, and just how these unprecedented moves led to his execution.
Uhmm... I am tempted to say Oswald because I am intensely fascinated with this oft misunderstood twenty-four year old. That said, in this particular case I don't think one can answer that question with anyone other than the target. Old Number 35 himself. Kennedy comes across as being a levelheaded, sophisticated, and inspired president. Undoubtedly the greatest one since FDR and possibly one of the handful of truly GREAT presidents.
I am not that wild about Mr. Larkin's performance. It is a trifle flat, though his voice is undoubtedly strong. I really, and I cannot stress this enough, much prefer when the book is read by the author. I have only owned four audiobooks in my life. Two of them are actually Vincent Bugliosi joints (I know, I know, but I knew that I would never, ever read the 2500 pages of reclaiming history so I thought I would listen to it on trips and whatnot, so I shoplifted it from a local bookstore one day when I was drunk. Ironically, I also bought Mr. Bugliosi's indictment of George W. Bush and the recent biography by British comic Jennifer Saunders of French and Saunders and Absolutely Fabulous fame. The only part of the W book I enjoy is actually the introduction read by Bugliosi himself. I cannot stress enough that I never, ever, in one million years with one million dollars would have bought the Saunders CD were it not read by Saunders herself. In my humble opinion, in both cases the author's reading of their own words adds color that is otherwise absent. In this respect I would much, much rather have heard Douglass read his own book, but Larkin is passable.
The part about the Chicago plot is one of the greatest available. It is shorter and more concise than the Abraham Bolden or Edwin Black treatments while still being mostly as informative. Also, the two Oswald stuff about the Texas Theater, redbird airfield, and the mysterious sighting of Oswald in a car with a license plate that belonged to close friends of J.D. Tippit are all compelling if I don't exactly believe all of them. (I would like to, but they simply seem too fantastic, despite the fact that Douglass has researched this as well as can possibly be done in this day and age when so many of the original players have shuffled off this mortal coil to quote Kevin Costner/Garrison) Whether every little thing about the two Oswalds is true or not, it is very interesting. Furthermore, you will not find the same depth of policy, historical context, and relevant assassination information in any other book. I agree, mostly that is, with CTKA's list of the ten best books on the assassination (though I have never read Kantor's book, and I don't think that Oswald and the CIA is better than Spy Saga... Blasphemy!). This book is, of course, one of those ten and nowhere else in that list will you find a book that does all of these things so well. Typically authors have to zero in more on a specific aspect of the case (Warren Commission, HSCA, medical evidence, Oswald, etc.) to be compelling. The only other book that really goes for everything and succeeds on this level is Rush to Judgement. Which, although a terrific read as Lane has an excellent literary voice and arguably the best "primer" book as it fleshes out the basic facts succinctly; it must be noted that a nearly fifty year old book simply isn't able to be considered in the same light as a book written in the wake of the ARRB revelations (which Douglass of course makes ample use of). With this in mind, sure it would be nice if everyone could read Battling Wall Street, JFK and Vietnam, Promises Kept, Oswald and the CIA, Breach of Trust, the Last Investigation, Rush to Judgment, Let Justice Be Done, etc. etc., the fact is that many people simply do not have that kind of time. As such, Douglass provides one of the best instances of bang for the buck in terms of time committed vis a vis information gleaned.
The rest of these are probably long enough. So, I'll just reiterate the fact that for an all in one look at domestic policy, foreign policy, assassination facts, declassified files, and historical context you could do a hell of a lot worse than JFK and the Unspeakable.
YEEESSSSSSS! Larkin reads it perfectly.
Layered complexity handled with unique deftness
His voice and pace.
Footnotes to a coup
It was well read
Author should have skipped Thomas Merton references. Other than that, a captivating, informational book!
I had high hopes for this book as an up-to-date aggregation of JFK assassination research to replace Jim Marrs' excellent (but dated) "Crossfire." Douglass' book is a huge disappointment, having more to do with the canonization of JFK as a Roman Catholic martyr than with the conspiracy itself.
Like Joe Friday, all I want are the facts. Douglass performs the specious task of imputing religious motivations to JFK's foreign policy, drawing parallels between that policy and the writings of Thomas Merton. Merton had about as much influence on JFK's foreign policy as Donald Duck.
I agree with the author that JFK was killed by the "military-industrial complex." The military-industrial complex is a Very Bad Thing that controls our government to this day ("Don't drone me, bro!"). However, the characterization of JFK as a saint strikes me as naive. To quote James Ellroy: "Jack Kennedy was the mythological front man for a particularly juicy slice of our history. He called a slick line and wore a world-class haircut. He was Bill Clinton minus pervasive media scrutiny and a few rolls of flab. Jack got whacked at the optimum moment to assure his sainthood."
The true story has been covered-up and the nation lied-to for 50 years. The full truth needs to be acknowledged by the government and the plotters exposed. This book, focused on Roman Catholic theology rather than the plot itself, does little to advance the cause. If you are an assassination conspiracy buff, better choices available on Audible include "LBJ: The Mastermind of the JFK Assassination" and "Legacy of Secrecy: The Long Shadow of the JFK Assassination."
Strange thing to me, is the author is very pro JFK. Yet he convinced me that if the CIA did kill him, they had to. He was indeed a threat to national security.
There are no listener reviews for this title yet.
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.