©1997 Jared Diamond; (P)2001 HighBridge Company
"The scope and explanatory power of this book are astounding." (The New Yorker)
"Guns, Germs, and Steel is an artful, informative, and delightful book....There is nothing like a radically new angle of vision for bringing out unsuspected dimensions of a subject." (The New York Review of Books)
Great topic, and often keen insights and information. However, the book seemed overly politically correct (Euroean cultures always bad, "indigenous" cultures (not clearly defined i.e. is a culture indigenous if the peoples were there 100 years prior to the next peoples? 500 years? 5,000?) always good.
The worked seemed tedious at times, and often in an apparent attempt to justify a preconceived conclusion.
I have tried several times to read this book so it was time to listen to it on audible. I am afraid my original impressions were right, this is a fascinating subject but written in a boring manner. Aspects and some hypotheses are intriguing although at times naive. Anyway I feel gratified I have finisihed with it ~ why on earth is listed as a best seller, did everyone else read it or just leave it on their shelves?
This author wants to point out SEVERAL times that he is trying to be non biased, but it is just overkill. The rest of the book is very interesting though.
I am sure this book is good for the academic. Sometimes it is even funny. But the narration style is monotonous, giving few clues to what the content means from a human perspective. This is not audio material.
It was so bad, that the end of the book came completely as a surprise, and left me wondering WHAT WAS the POINT?
Worse, it left me with WHO CARES?
Not I, not after listening for all those hours.
"Instead, it might very well be that once the civilizational process is begun, there emerges a feedback effect, which by making the more intelligent in each generation more fit for reproduction, gradually increases the overall cognitive ability of the peoples inhabiting the evolving civilisations. Being smart in civilization is beneficial for your chances of reproducing yourself, and so the smarties get more numerous. Mr. Diamond doesn't see this."
Our intelligence evolved in pre-civilized societies. In civilizations, it does not require intelligence to reproduce. In today's world, those who are uneducated and living in poverty are the ones reproducing.
No boubt that Prof JAred Diamond has done a great study, its highly recommended because he has put 30 years of experience in writing this book. Some time during this books he talks a lot about petricular topic like he gave so much detail about domestic animals, some times this book lacks interest but after a good patience finally it becomes worthwhile to read.
Jared Diamond is an excellent author, and so would this book be, if only his theorizing were true and unflawed. But it's not. He starts the book by stating that he's out to destroy the claim that genetic differences is the cause of the global disparity in civilizational achivement between different peoples and races, a claim he considers low and immoral. Then he proceeds by asserting that the inhabitants of Papua New Guinea are genetically superior to whites. This self-contradiction is not rendered any less stupid by the fact that it's done without reference to any evidence beyond the mere hunch of the author.
The main argument of the book is that different peoples have made civilizations that differ not because the peoples themselves are of varying genetic giftedness, but because they've been unequally procured by their respective environments with the ingredients necessary for civilization-building, chiefly: crops suitable for agriculture, animals suitable for domestication, soil suitable for farming, and habitats spacious enough to support the numbers of humans needed to preserve knowledge through hard times, and located in connection to other sites of civilization in an horizontal fashion, rather than a vertical one. This argument is all very well and quite plausible, but mr. Diamond forgets something. Although it's possible that it was the uniquely beneficial environment which laid the foundation for the Eurasian civilizational preeminence, that doesn't prove that all races are equally intellectually gifted today. Instead, it might very well be that once the civilizational process is begun, there emerges a feedback effect, which by making the more intelligent in each generation more fit for reproduction, gradually increases the overall cognitive ability of the peoples inhabiting the evolving civilisations. Being smart in civilization is beneficial for your chances of reproducing yourself, and so the smarties get more numerous. Mr. Diamond doesn't see this.
Report Inappropriate Content