An intellectual feast for fans of offbeat history, Ghostland takes listeners on a road trip through some of the country's most infamously haunted places - and deep into the dark side of our history.
Colin Dickey is on the trail of America's ghosts. Crammed into old houses and hotels, abandoned prisons and empty hospitals, the spirits that linger continue to capture our collective imagination, but why? His own fascination piqued by a house hunt in Los Angeles that revealed derelict foreclosures and "zombie homes", Dickey embarks on a journey across the continental United States to decode and unpack the American history repressed in our most famous haunted places. Some have established reputations as "the most haunted mansion in America" or "the most haunted prison"; others, like the haunted Indian burial grounds in West Virginia, evoke memories from the past our collective nation tries to forget.
With boundless curiosity, Dickey conjures the dead by focusing on questions of the living - how do we, the living, deal with stories about ghosts, and how do we inhabit and move through spaces that have been deemed, for whatever reason, haunted? Paying attention not only to the true facts behind a ghost story but also to the ways in which changes to those facts are made - and why those changes are made - Dickey paints a version of American history left out of the textbooks, one of things left undone, crimes left unsolved. Spellbinding, scary, and wickedly insightful, Ghostland discovers the past we're most afraid to speak of aloud in the bright light of day is the same past that tends to linger in the ghost stories we whisper in the dark.
©2016 Colin Dickey (P)2016 Penguin Audio
The lack of history and yet the lack of proof the author gives for his theories. This follows a set course: each chapter tells a famous ghost story and the author then goes on to debunk it. In that light, every analysis end up with one of three refrains: people using someone's tragedy for their entertainment, people smearing an innocent person's name/rep, and it never happened.
Every single story breaks down into these three and it often get rather boring. It's quite obvious the author doesn't believe in ghosts (which would've been fine in itself if he kept a more open attitude about it all) and the tone of the book goes between scolding/accusatory and lecturing for much of it. I got to the point where I wanted to chuck my Ipod the next time the narrator said 'Again, people capitalizing on other person's tragedy for their entertainment.'
Despite saying he has an open mind, he leaves nothing to chance. Every single little 'oh, it might be ghosts' is explained away. What little history is actually in this book (that doesn't pertain to the actual stories themselves) is vague and unsupported. The author gives us one reason why people like ghost stories: because we don't keep our dead loved ones in our homes for 3 or so days after their deaths, thus we must've removed the horror of it from us. There's no supporting evidence to this and he never brings up the fact that we've been fascinated by death for as long as we've had written record -- and it's not a stretch to say before then too.
In short, listened to this is sort of like being lectured at for being a terrible person for liking ghost stories. Bleh. It's strange for the author to take such a tack because he states in the beginning that no one can make believers stop believing in ghosts -- and then he spends the rest of the book try. LOL
I couldn't finish it. I wanted to like this but all around it's just not good.
I think the premise is really interesting, but its not really about ghosts--and the title helps to mislead potential readers. Its more about debunking ghost stories by way of psychology, history, and architecture. Attacking it that way kind of makes the whole book a downer, like we're a nation of chumps who make up ghosts to deal with the way we remember things culturally.
The narrator took the whole thing too seriously--he sounded like he was narrating a crime novel. He also couldn't fully commit to using other voices or accents. At some point he quotes Charles Dickens and kind of uses a British accent, but only slightly. Doing it half way distracts from the content.
I would have been more interested to read about lesser known stories--the author makes too many pop-culture references, like the film "12 years a slave" and "the shining." Yes, they were a propos, but they don't signal any deep research.I would have also refined the scope of the book to make it more cohesive. Architecture as it relates to ghost folklore probably would have been a broad enough topic, and the legacy of slavery in America would definitely have been enough.I would have also committed more fully to a specific tone--the expository parts made the anecdotal/personal parts very jarring. Keep it serious and scientific or go for conversational--this book tried to do both, to its detriment.
Why couldnt Bill Bryson have written this book?
I wanted to like this book. I found that as a new topic would start it would grab my interest, but a few minutes in, my mind would start to wander. I wish there had been more information on the hauntings themselves.
The title doesn't really capture the topic of this book.I was completely engrossed and enjoyed it tremendously
The basic premise of telling a scripted ghost story or haunting, then analyzing the cultural forces behind said story and the actual facts to give a more realistic interpretation of the situation is enough to drive a book. An "Adam Ruins Everything" exclusively for ghosts.
Unfortunately the writer is incredibly fond of re-stating ideas with increasingly flowery paragraphs, as if one is reading a book that had a minimum word requirement and the author only had 2/3rds of said requirement the night before sending it out.
There are some delightfully fascinating segments, especially if the psychology of haunted houses and ghost stories fascinate you. Unfortunately there are vast swaths of Ghostland so boring I caught myself tuning out the narration as unimportant noise for half an hour or more, only to discover I'd missed nothing important.
I thought this book was going to be about ghost stories. I was wrong. Returning it.
Normally when I check out a book by an author featured on an overnight conspiracy type talk show I'm see disappointed, not this time. The book is very well researched and written, answering more questions than it raises. Not only does it delve into the true origins of some of the nation's more famous ghost stories, but it does it in such a way as to ensure the listener understands why the legend is often much different than reality.
The author tackles the subjects of ghosts and haunted places from a variety of angles and presents a well-rounded overview with an appropriate degree of skepticism. This isn't just a collection of ghost stories, but an examination of ghosts and hauntings in historical, literary, religious, philosophical and sociological contexts. This turned out to be so much more than I had expected. It is entertaining, informative and well-written.
As other reviewers have pointed out, if you want straight ghost stories you'll want to go elsewhere. But if you (like me) enjoy some American history and social context behind haunted legends, this is perfect for you. Mr. Dickey thoroughly researches the legends of these haunted landmarks and attractions, including interviews whenever available. History, sociology, anthropology, mythology, and the supernatural- this has it all!
Report Inappropriate Content