China. Korea. Japan. Southeast Asia. How did Eastern civilization develop? What do we know about the history, politics, governments, art, science, and technology of these countries? And how does the story of Eastern civilization play out in today's world of business, politics, and international exchange?
Over the course of 48 ambitious lectures, take a grand journey through Eastern civilization to study everything from the material economy of day-to-day life to the political and religious philosophies that would bind these cultures together for thousands of years. While China is home to some of the great moments in world history and a major focal point for this course, you'll also take several extended forays into Central and Southeast Asia to build a comprehensive picture of Eastern civilization.
"To truly understand the modern world, it is essential to know something about the many extraordinary contributions Eastern civilization has made," Professor Benjamin says. "Simply put, it is not enough to know just the 'Western' half of the story any more-both Eastern and Western are critical to understanding our present and our future."
Now is your chance to fill in the other half of the story. You may be surprised to realize that all of us have been students of Eastern civilization, even if we have not been aware of it. Filled with captivating stories and surprising details, this course will open up an entirely new world for you as it unfolds the story of Eastern civilization.
PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying reference material will be available in your Library section along with the audio.
©2013 The Great Courses (P)2013 The Teaching Company, LLC
Perhaps...at least certain parts.
From Yao to Mao: 5000 Years of Chinese History (The Great Courses, Narrated By Professor Kenneth J. Hammond); The Fall and Rise of China (The Great Courses, Narrated By Professor Richard Baum. The present book is the third lecture series from The Great Courses on China. Of the three, Baum's is much the best but covers mainly the last couple of centuries. Hammond's is a straightforward survey that is rather superficial; it provides the basic information but does not really convey the sense of how things were and why they happened (this is of course always a problem with broad surveys). Benjamin's survey suffers from this too, but he makes up for it by drawing upon archaeological evidence and by including Korea, Japan and southeast asia to put thing into a "big history" perspective.
He is energetic and evidently engaged. His Australian accent did not bother me too much, but his problem is his misunderstanding of the Chinese pinyin system of transliteration. He tell us that it is a more intuitive improvement on the older and more complicated Wade-Giles, when in reality pinyin's aim is an unambiguous coding of the sounds of Chinese through the Roman (NOT the English) alphabet. As a result, pinyin is far from intuitive for a speaker of English or any other Western language since it does not refer to any particular Western language; in fact, an English speaker would have a better chance of pronouncing something comprehensibly using Wade-Giles which was based on English. More specifically, the letters x,c,q are impossible to pronounce intuitively; unless their arbitrary phonetic values are learned precisely, the pronunciation will be incomprehensible, as often in this audiobook. E.g. the name Cao-cao is pronounced "Kao-kao" when it should be "tsao-tsao", 'Quan" becomes "Kuan" when it should sound more like "chuan". The distinction between words ending with '-an' and '-ang' is also essential, and here too mistakes render all but incomprehensible names that the reader does not already know. Pinyin is an excellent system, but it needs to be learned in a systematic way. I was dismayed that Prof.Benjamin had not done this.
There are some factual errors that I don't have time to point out, and in particular Benjamin's understanding of post World-war II China leaves much to be desired (in this area Richard Baum is far more competent). Despite its failings, however, I would still recommend this course for its "big-history" perspective.
Overall: a solid course full of great history from a professor with an engaging style but there were also a number of lectures I found myself disinterested and wondering when a deep discussion of the foundations of an Eastern civilization would occur.
• The following topics were engaging: the history of China, all of its major dynasties, oracle bone inscriptions of the Shang dynasty, the silk roads, samurai Japan, and the evolution of the countries from conquerors to the conquered at various times in their histories
• Eastern civilization was not just studied in isolation: interactions with the western world, comparisons to the western world at different points in time, and the examinations of which civilization was leading technological advances on the world scene at what times helped add perspective
• At times I wished the professor would’ve spelled the name of the dynasty or person he was discussing since he seemed to either mispronounce it or say it in a fast way that seemed rushed
• At times the recounting of the rise and fall of dynasty after dynasty (especially in Korea and Japan) without any historical context of the ultimate legacy of that dynasty or providing perspective at a bigger picture level was monotonous and un-intriguing
• Although the professor does a good job of continuously referencing the “foundations of Eastern civilization” in his lectures, the foundations themselves seemed light to me; Other than respect for elders, an emphasis on the collective vs. the individual, Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism (and even in these cases I found myself wishing the professor would’ve elaborated a little further on the key tenants or provided practical examples of their use in government, society, etc.) there seemed to be a lack of core foundations that would define an “Eastern civilization”
• Breaking up the course into four distinct regions (China, Korea, Japan, and southeast Asia such as Vietnam) and discussing one region at a time for a number of centuries before switching to another led to a sense of hopping backwards and forward in time just a little too much; A more effective approach could’ve been discussing all four regions at the same time in a strict chronological narrative
Learn, understand, then decide whether you accept or reject.
There are many resources that examine Chinese history and Chinese civilization, but this is one of the rare resources that cover China, Japan, Korea, Vietnam and the other nations and civilizations of Central Asia.
Everything from great leaders, philosophies, economics, religions and their influences from and to other parts of the world and among themselves. It is a deep, rich course leaving you wanting more.
I really enjoyed this lecture as an introduction to Chinese/Far Eastern history. I started out not knowing much at all about anything farther east than Persia, and now feel like I have a solid grasp on the general course of Chinese history, and would not like to learn more about a few specific periods and places that I had never heard of before (such as the Kushan empire).
One thing I did not like about this course was the inconsistent or inaccurate pronunciation of various place names and dynasties. Sometimes he pronounces a word correctly the first time, but then anglicizes it more later--and at times the pronunciation is not only incorrect, but leaves you with an entirely mistaken idea of how it might be spelled (which makes it harder to look further into an interesting topic).
Otherwise it was an informative and enjoyable listen.
Very engaging speaker, weaves in interesting stories. Really seems to know Chinese history well. Gives a brief, but good overview of Korean history. Southeast Asia is barely covered, but he does what he can.
My only qualm was with the Japanese history lectures. Granted he has a lot to cover, but he seems to be a bit out of his depth here. He makes some assertions that a casual student of Japan will find incorrect. (For example, he seems to suggest that all of Heian read the Tale of Genji during Muraski Shikubu's lifetime, when in reality only a few of her close consorts would have heard it.)
Still, overall I got what I wanted out of this course. A good value for money if you stick with it until the end =)
Input, Intellection, Context, Connectedness, Responsibility
I liked the approach of following the influence of political philosophies across the centuries. I was surprised by the emphasis given to the changing status of wonen and thw poor in the region.
The narration was not engaging. It was good enough, though. the content were not interesting to me, I would be disappointed. However , the value if the content superceded the narration.
Excellent performance! Engaging teacher even in the minute details. As a Western born Chinese -American I have obviously been indoctrinated with Western "foundations".
This "foundations" course was expansive, comprehensive, and engaging in detail.
I would take more courses from Professor Benjamin in a heart beat!
Excellent orator! Enthusiastic about his subject.
Foundations of Eastern Civilization is too generic. The title should read.
China, the epicenter of Eastern Civilization. or The very beginnings of Eastern Civilization
English school principal & teacher in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan.
Professor Benjamin's narration was the best I've heard in this series. He has such a command over his train of thought and voice, it really enhanced the listening experience.
A very good series that marches through the historical events of the three major nations of East Asia. the only problem is that the lecturer absolutely butchers a lot of the names. I know that it can be hard for someone that doesn't speak the language, but he absolutely misses on some fairly well known names.
Far better than Yao to Mao, this history includes a political history from ancient times for China and, to a lesser extent, Japan and Korea. You obviously can't expect more than a summary in the time available, but this lecture series makes me feel like I have an understanding of the forces that have shaped Eastern Asia.
"Overall good but details need checking"
The course covers the history of Asia from pre-history to modern day, with an emphasis on the part before 16th/17th century. Probably because of the emphasis on foundation of the course. On a grand scale, the relatively isolated Asia and subsequent exchange of ideas and trade within Asia and with west are well established and told. So it's good for a general introduction to East Asian history, particularly China, Korea and Japan. The pronunciation is certainly awkward for a non-Chinese/Korean/Japanese speaker, but he tried, and mostly succeeded.
However, the small nuisances and details in regard to a particular character or place or name are often wrong. For example, it's common to refer to an emperor by his reign name or posthumous title or real name. But to mistake one's reign name for his real name is a bit too much. Same goes saying the last emperor of Sui dynasty declared himself "Yang Di (the flaming emperor)". Firstly, that's a posthumous title, no one declares themselves that title. Secondly, even if someone did, he wouldn't have picked that name. Because, although in common language, "Yang" means flaming, in posthumous title, it means "deviation from justice, not fulfil one's duty", simply not a positive title. You only ever see the last or second to last emperor of a dynasty to have that title. It especially annoyed me because he had to repeat this wrong understanding several times along the way. Similarly, Japan's "tent government" doesn't mean it's meant to be temporary. Tent government is not an accurate translation in the first place, too literal. The head of "tent government" Shokan, in fact means General or high command. Tent was his headquarters when he was out fighting. It's where his advisors, high ranking officers gathered discussing strategy and made decisions. So when a general claimed power, his government was called "tent government".
For a friend who doesn't know anything of eastern culture, I would recommend it for it gives enough contents and links with western countries to be easily understandable. For someone who knows eastern culture or want to go a bit amateur professional on the subject, I wouldn't because it contains a lot of mistakes to make further research hard and confusing.
Not applicable in this case
Check and re-check something I knew but got confused by his mistakes. Got me interested in Korean history though.
Got to admit, these details I picked up on probably don't matter on a grand scale. And a non-Chinese/Korean/Japanese speaker is hardly going to remember any awkwardly pronounced names after listening. Just bear in mind these kind of nuisances mentioned in the course aren't entirely accurate.
"ANOTHER GREAT LECTURE SERIES FROM THE PREMIER GCS"
So far i liked the in-depth and expansive look into the various Eastern Civilization
Empor Wu di. Joking this is not a book.
Put simply Professor Craig is well grounded and highly knowledgable about the Eastern civilization. However, i was impressed by his ability to connect events and critical fairly unbaised analysis.
Well you actually can. But i love taking my time to listen to audiobooks especially the ones i find interesting.
Brilliant work by The Great Courses Series. Only if the Great Courses Had its own University they would produced the most critically and open students yet.
Professor Criag has opened me up to understanding more about the East and their role in global community.
"China! China! China!"
It paints a really good portrait of the Sinosphere, with China as the Sun and the other countries floating around it, each definitely their own country, but inexorably drawn in towards China's cultural mass.
Yes, the description of imperial Beijing as a cosmopolitan hub was really well done.
The book has a great flow.
Report Inappropriate Content