We are currently making improvements to the Audible site. In an effort to enhance the accessibility experience for our customers, we have created a page to more easily navigate the new experience, available at the web address www.audible.com/access.
 >   > 
Civil War of 1812: American Citizens, British Subjects, Irish Rebels, & Indian Allies | [Alan Taylor]

Civil War of 1812: American Citizens, British Subjects, Irish Rebels, & Indian Allies

Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Alan Taylor tells the riveting story of a war that redefined North America. In a world of double identities, slippery allegiances, and porous borders, the leaders of the American Republic and the British Empire struggled to control their own diverse peoples. Taylor’s vivid narrative of an often brutal—sometimes farcical—war reveals much about the tangled origins of the United States and Canada.
Regular Price:$38.49
  • Membership Details:
    • First book free with 30-day trial
    • $14.95/month thereafter for your choice of 1 new book each month
    • Cancel easily anytime
    • Exchange books you don't like
    • All selected books are yours to keep, even if you cancel
  • - or -

Your Likes make Audible better!

'Likes' are shared on Facebook and Audible.com. We use your 'likes' to improve Audible.com for all our listeners.

You can turn off Audible.com sharing from your Account Details page.

OK

Publisher's Summary

Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Alan Taylor tells the riveting story of a war that redefined North America. In a world of double identities, slippery allegiances, and porous borders, the leaders of the American Republic and the British Empire struggled to control their own diverse peoples. Taylor’s vivid narrative of an often brutal—sometimes farcical—war reveals much about the tangled origins of the United States and Canada.

©2010 Alan Taylor (P)2010 Recorded Books, LLC

What Members Say

Average Customer Rating

3.8 (78 )
5 star
 (23)
4 star
 (34)
3 star
 (9)
2 star
 (8)
1 star
 (4)
Overall
3.7 (59 )
5 star
 (18)
4 star
 (25)
3 star
 (5)
2 star
 (5)
1 star
 (6)
Story
3.9 (60 )
5 star
 (21)
4 star
 (21)
3 star
 (9)
2 star
 (6)
1 star
 (3)
Performance
Sort by:
  •  
    margot new york, NY, United States 04-22-12
    margot new york, NY, United States 04-22-12 Member Since 2011
    HELPFUL VOTES
    36
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    27
    26
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "A proper history of an obscure epoch"

    The only things missing in this book are an in-depth treatment of the burning of Washington DC, the "rockets' red glare" in Baltimore harbor, the shelling of Stonington, CT, and the Battle of New Orleans. But most of these things were minor sideshows to the real war, and of course New Orleans happened after the war had officially ended.

    Otherwise I can't praise this enough as a compelling and informative history. Its thesis is that the American Revolution did not really end in 1781 or 1783; that certain British interests saw the USA as a temporary aberration, and sought to exploit its disorganization and economic slump during the 1780s-90s.

    The real origins of the War of 1812 were not the usual background causes we are told about--impressment of seamen, trade with France--but rather the British government's basic failure to comply with its undertakings in the Treaty of Paris (they did not actually give up the western and Great Lakes forts they were supposed to evacuate) and their persistent harassment of American settlers on the western frontier. Added to this was the British attempt to siphon off thousands of Americans into Upper Canada by offering 200 free acres to anyone who wanted it.

    This is where most of the early 19th century Ontario settlers came from, by the way: they were Americans from New England and Upstate New York who took the free-land offer. They were not Brits and they were not exiled Tories. (Very few Revolutionary War Tories went to Canada in any event; Tories had mainly gone to the Acadian provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, which were not part of Canada.)

    Most of the War of 1812 was about the Americans' attempt to take over Upper Canada, or Ontario, which then as now thrust itself like an arm into the north-central USA. The Americans had a very good case. Most of the inhabitants were actually Americans, the British had no clear claim on the land, and in fact the only real interest the British had in the region was to use it as a staging area for taking America back.

    So what happened? Why was Ontario not taken? The answer is that the American forces were poorly prepared and slightly provisioned, no match for the seasoned Redcoats at Detroit and York and Niagara. That's really all it was. But this loss paid off big dividends in the development of the American forces. The new academy at West Point was quickly transformed into a serious institution of military training after 1812, as a direct result of the woeful experiences during the war.

    6 of 6 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Amazon Customer 04-27-12 Member Since 2011
    HELPFUL VOTES
    7
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    3
    3
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Refreshing...kinda"
    What did you love best about Civil War of 1812?

    Well, written and more balanced than usual.


    What three words best describe Andrew Garman’s voice?

    Measured, well-enunciated, but with occasional mispronunciations,


    Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

    No


    Any additional comments?

    Given that the author is an American historian, he is reasonably even-handed and does not portray the War of 1812 in the usual starry-eyed, "it was a glorious victory really" style of most American history. He does, however, occasionally fall into that habit Americans have of portraying the British as a mere foil against which Americans tested their fitness for greatness. He also makes some annoying mistakes which a serious historian should not make, even when talking about a foreign power - he keeps referring to the "imperial lords" (I think he means the British Government) and on one occasion refers to "Lord Wellington". Who? The real strength of the book is to point out the complexities of American motives for the war. He places front and centre the objective of breaking British power in North America, the destruction of Indian resistance (both closely interconnected) and the possible windfall outcome of those objectives, the absorption of Upper Canada. He does not sugar-coat the fiasco that was the American Army's performance on the Canadian frontier. For those looking for a general history of the war, they will be disappointed that he does not cover the naval war or British amphibious operations against American shores in any depth (for this, from a British perspective, see Latimer, "The Challenge"). Similarly, although he is excellent on the internal politics of Canada and the US, he does little to explore the economic effects of the war on the US, probably the key issue of the time.He is also very good on the conclusion to the war, and in particular the British Government's sudden switch from holding out tough terms from the Americans to essentially giving the US everything it wanted. Interestingly, he suggests this switch came after Wellington advised to give the US whatever it wanted, and concentrate on the real issues in Europe. Perhaps Mr. Taylor should have subtitled his book "How the Duke of Wellington Saved the Republic"!

    6 of 7 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Irene Adler La Habra, US 03-12-13
    Irene Adler La Habra, US 03-12-13 Member Since 2001
    HELPFUL VOTES
    89
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    31
    4
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Misnamed and misrepresented"

    The previous version of this review was overtly negative, but no one likes negative reviews, so here is the new version.

    First, Professor Taylor writes what is called "micro history" gathering extremely detailed data from journals, newspaper reports, official papers, etc. The presumption is that such a collection of dubious sources will somehow bounce around the truth, and, even more important, that they are statistically representative. Neither assumption is generally true. While such an approach can sometimes help to provide an rich picture of the times, it cannot be taken to provide an accurate global picture of what happened. There is value in the minutia and a richness of detail (as seen in William Couper's Town), but all too often when the global issues must be understood, one is left uncertain whether to take the minutia as representative.

    In addition, the author often mixes in sweeping unreferenced statements of generality with his mix of possibly (or even probably) unrepresentative minutia. The net is that the reader is not sure what to believe. It is not that he cannot see the forest for the trees (although that is certainly the case), he cannot determine whether he is seeing a tree or the forest.

    Second, Taylor ignores many of the critical historical events in pursuit of an indefensible, by any other means, thesis that the War of 1812 was "Civil". It was not. Major, if not decisive, aspects of the war did not occur on the US/Canada border, in which locations the "civil" label cannot be remotely stretched to apply. It was a war between a massive empire and the fledgling US republic. The fact that some of the participants and one part of the war were ethnically, linguistically, and racially similar does not make it a civil war. There were clear boundaries and distinct not predominantly intermixed populations and political systems. Civil wars are between peoples of the same country. That was simply not the case in the War of 1812. Taylor repeatedly asserts, without convincing evidence, that most people on the US/Canada border were not interested in the war at all, which is hardly a sign of civil discord. In short, the "civil" adjective is at best a stretch that adds novelty, but does not constitute a useful encapsulation of the historical events.

    Third, in contrast to the person-by-person minutia presented about the border war whole segments of the war are largely ignored, e.g., the sea war with warships and privateer, the war in the American south, the Battle of Bladensburg, etc. One suspects that this is more due to Taylor's familiarity with the sources relating to that region than with a conscious decision of its relative importance. Basically, Taylor has written in the style of a PhD dissertation.

    Forth, contrary to the claims of other reviewers, the writing is average and not economical as one would expect from well presented popular history such as written by Tuchman and Churchill.

    In short, if your expectation is a history or the War of 1812, then you will be disappointed. If you are interested in a quixotic, selective and irregular presentation of the Great Lakes theater of the War of 1812 (and accept that it was in essence "civil"), then you might find this a useful, but for me the book lacked too much to be recommended.

    4 of 5 people found this review helpful
  •  
    GEORGE Waverly, OH, United States 11-29-12
    GEORGE Waverly, OH, United States 11-29-12 Member Since 2011

    Hobby- Military History Occupation- Retired Commander USN; Retired Director of Quality Assurance; Graduate Liberty University, Lynchburg VA; Residence-Waverly Ohio

    HELPFUL VOTES
    34
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    253
    10
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    1
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Must Read"

    Although I have been reading books on American History for the past 40 years, this book showed me how little I knew about the war of 1812. Once I started listening to material presented, I found it hard to stop listening and put the book away. The author presents the material such that their is nothing booring or dry about this book. I found the intertwinning of historial facts and stories about the people and things being discussed enlightening. In my opinion, if you intersted in more than the "Burning of Washington" and the "Battle of New Orleans", this is a good book to read to follow the events of the other 3 years of war in North American.

    1 of 1 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Keith Storrs Haverhill, MA 04-18-11
    Keith Storrs Haverhill, MA 04-18-11 Member Since 2009
    HELPFUL VOTES
    35
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    49
    6
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    3
    0
    Overall
    "Know what this book is and is not before purchase"

    I wanted to learn more about the war of 1812, and this book did help me understand more about it. However, it is not a end to end history of the war. The author is clear about this, and I don't mean to say this book isn't good. The focus of this book is on Canada and not the entire war theatre. I guess I was hoping for more. Oh, and can someone tell the narrator that the pronunciation of Marquis is "mar-kee" and not "mar-kwis"?

    7 of 12 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Doug Cox Cumberland, BC Canada 10-30-12
    Doug Cox Cumberland, BC Canada 10-30-12 Member Since 2012
    HELPFUL VOTES
    3
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    20
    3
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Boring!"
    What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?

    Sorry but the writing just wasn't there for me. It was like reading a school report.


    What was most disappointing about Alan Taylor’s story?

    the writing


    How could the performance have been better?

    better writing


    What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

    disappointment - could have been such a colourful story.


    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    W. Rodger Gantt 08-06-12 Listener Since 2004
    HELPFUL VOTES
    88
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    14
    12
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "A Good Read but Not for Everyone"
    Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?

    Like virtually all history books, ???Civil War of 1812??? focuses on a series of events which are both informative and yet too much detail for many readers. A proud American, I also have friends in Canada, several of whom are French Canadians. Although America tried to invade Canada twice, during the Revolutionary War and later the War of 1812, our two countries have moved on and we have a close friendship with Canada along with its relations with the British Commonwealth. It helps that we are the only country with which Canada has a border and a friendly one at that. An expert from Wikipedia, ???[In a 2009 Canadian poll], 37% of Canadians said the war [of 1812] was a Canadian victory, 9% said the U.S. won, 15% called it a draw, and 39% - mainly younger Canadians - said they knew too little to comment.??? So, if you want to learn more about a series of battles between the U.S. and the British along the eastern Great Lakes and the Saint Lawrence River, then this book is for you.


    What did you like best about this story?

    I'm a lover of related, correct detail and from this book know more about the American / Canadian Civil War of 1812 than many Americans or Canadians.


    What about Andrew Garman???s performance did you like?

    Clearly read with the right pace.


    Was there a moment in the book that particularly moved you?

    Following the Treaty of Ghent, toward the end of the book, where the hard feelings between America and Canada started to soften a bit.


    Any additional comments?

    I used to be an omnivorous reader which required me to sit and concentrate. Now, with audio books, I can do chores around the house while listening to books, concentrating just as well.

    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Janice United States 01-17-12
    Janice United States 01-17-12 Member Since 2011
    HELPFUL VOTES
    1
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    1
    1
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "How My Country Came To Be."
    If you could sum up Civil War of 1812 in three words, what would they be?

    Interesting Educational Local


    What did you like best about this story?

    The story explained so much about the area that I live in and how it came to be.



    Any additional comments?

    I found the narrator, Andrew Garman, to have a tone of voice and presentation manner which held my interest and made it difficult to stop listening. Thank You.

    1 of 2 people found this review helpful
  •  
    James Biesty 07-07-12 Member Since 2010
    HELPFUL VOTES
    2
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    13
    4
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "If you like David Mccullough you won't like this.."
    Would you try another book from Alan Taylor and/or Andrew Garman?

    Maybe but he'd have to change his writing style.


    Has Civil War of 1812 turned you off from other books in this genre?

    no


    What three words best describe Andrew Garman’s performance?

    good not great


    Any additional comments?

    Really disappointed with the writing style of this author. I listen to a lot of historical audio books and my favorite is where the author turns it into an easy to follow story. This was not that book. The author is all over the place with writings from so many different people that you loose interest. The first 1/3 of the book could of been summarized in a short chapter or 2. This is more for someone who is more of a serious historian and not for the people who like history but also want to be entertained. It's too confusing and there wasn't enough of a steady story line. The narrative seemed schizophrenic. He made this war uninteresting and I stopped the book after getting about half way through. I would say dump this book and look for other books like 1776, The Coldest Winter, Genghis Kahn and the making of the modern world, John Adams and Undaunted Courage.

    1 of 4 people found this review helpful
  • Showing: 1-9 of 9 results

    There are no listener reviews for this title yet.

Report Inappropriate Content

If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.

Cancel

Thank You

Your report has been received. It will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.