We are currently making improvements to the Audible site. In an effort to enhance the accessibility experience for our customers, we have created a page to more easily navigate the new experience, available at the web address www.audible.com/access .
 >   > 
A History of Money and Banking in the United States: The Colonial Era to World War II Audiobook

A History of Money and Banking in the United States: The Colonial Era to World War II

Regular Price:$24.95
  • Membership Details:
    • First book free with 30-day trial
    • $14.95/month thereafter for your choice of 1 new book each month
    • Cancel easily anytime
    • Exchange books you don't like
    • All selected books are yours to keep, even if you cancel
  • - or -

Publisher's Summary

In what is sure to become the standard account, Rothbard traces inflations, banking panics, and money meltdowns from the colonial period through the mid-20th century to show how government's systematic war on sound money is the hidden force behind nearly all major economic calamities in American history.

Never has the story of money and banking been told with such rhetorical power and theoretical vigor. You will treasure this volume.

From the introduction by Joseph Salerno:

"Rothbard employs the Misesian approach to economic history consistently and dazzlingly throughout the volume to unravel the causes and consequences of events and institutions ranging over the course of US monetary history, from the colonial times through the New Deal era. One of the important benefits of Rothbard's unique approach is that it naturally leads to an account of the development of the US monetary system in terms of a compelling narrative linking human motives and plans that oftentimes are hidden and devious, leading to outcomes that sometimes are tragic. And one will learn much more about monetary history from reading this exciting story than from poring over reams of statistical analysis. Although its five parts were written separately, this volume presents a relatively integrated narrative, with very little overlap, that sweeps across 300 years of US monetary history."

©2005 Ludwig von Mises Institute (P)2010 Ludwig von Mises Institute

What Members Say

Average Customer Rating

4.2 (35 )
5 star
 (19)
4 star
 (9)
3 star
 (2)
2 star
 (4)
1 star
 (1)
Overall
4.2 (35 )
5 star
 (19)
4 star
 (10)
3 star
 (2)
2 star
 (3)
1 star
 (1)
Story
4.0 (34 )
5 star
 (13)
4 star
 (13)
3 star
 (4)
2 star
 (3)
1 star
 (1)
Performance
Sort by:
  •  
    Phil O. San Diego, CA, United States 02-04-16
    Phil O. San Diego, CA, United States 02-04-16 Member Since 2011
    HELPFUL VOTES
    963
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    297
    291
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    248
    2
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Great facts (if selective); ideological rigidity"

    As one of several histories of this topic I have read, I find this indispensable. It is lucid, and has the fortitude to lay out its arguments straightforwardly though many are (bravely enough) contrarian to conventional histories. Well and good. However, and I always find this bizarre in an author of this obvious intellect and discipline, the facts are cherry-picked and the characters one-dimensional in service of the author's ideology. (I repeatedly think of Nassim Taleb's references to the Bed of Procrustes -- hacking off the head and feet of any inconvenient facts to fit the intended conclusions.) This, for me, does not make me flee this book, as I have said it is a very informative work. It simply necessitates reading other histories. Alexander Hamilton's achievements are barely noticed and glossed over. Andrew Jackson was a good guy, period, no exceptions, who knew precisely what he was doing all down the line, and when his opponents opened the money spigots and he slammed the brakes, the ensuing multi-year depression was all his opponents' fault. His characters are often one-dimensional in this way: all good or all bad. Jay Cooke was bad. Period. And, facts are oddly detached from their surroundings, which can be glaring if one is versed in the surrounding history and has thought much about it. If one is a hard-money banking purist, knee-jerk style, perhaps living in a libertarian basement, the arguments may make perfect, almost algebraic sense. To me, reality and its players and patterns and meanings are NEVER that neat. That's why movies are not mistaken for reality, and many books deserve this sort of scrutiny. They are reductive. However, nations have tough choices to make and things to do, little things like a Civil War to finance, and its aftermath. Frankly, that Civil War, funded with help from such evil fellows as Cooke, helped develop the global military power needed in the 20th century that, thank God, I was born and sheltered in. I live in a prosperous country that is on top of the world, relative to others, and is the backbone of a world order, so I have a hard time buying the counter-factual of how wonderful everything would be if we had clung quasi-religiously to hard money zealotry, along this rigid line. Frankly, I think we would be road-kill for some better organized nation's military, had we gone that decentralized route. And guess what: a lot of resources were wasted getting here. Nit-picking this process as if one had a better counter-history to offer is presumptuous. This is the kind of trap many of my most intelligent friends fall into (and sometimes, sadly, leaders of the USA, not to mention the voters following their fairy tales) -- they can get into such elaborate self-deluded architectures of aggrieved fantasy that they lose sight of simple virtues and victories right in front of them, in a messy world where unintended consequences, missteps and waste befall all paths. This to me is merely another form of spoiled "entitlement" I, unsurprisingly, usually hear such self-deluders prating about. Nevertheless, these provisos aside, I urge anyone with an interest in this topic to give this book a good listening. You will be well served. For example, the account of the Suffolk Bank, in effect a private clearing and central bank, and a very effective one, points to creative ways finance may evolve, going forward, in private hands (and perhaps with new networking technologies). And that sort of thing is a big attraction of history reading for me. Lots of things have been tried before, brilliantly, but may need a diligent historian like this to pull them out. I'm very satisfied with this book. Growing my intellect means listening carefully and patiently to authors whose ideas I did not, at the start of the book, hold. That's a main reason to read any book, I reckon: to stretch my mind.

    9 of 14 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Jakob 03-18-16
    Jakob 03-18-16 Member Since 2014
    HELPFUL VOTES
    15
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    69
    17
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "A lot to take in."

    I like the way Rothbard relays the facts. He distinguishes clearly between his analysis and the actual history of money and banking. This book changes my view of the history in general.
    About the narration: Very well enunciated at a comfortable speed, given the complexity of the subject. Minor issues with word stress; stressing correct words among groups of words.

    2 of 3 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Amazon Customer 03-07-16 Member Since 2015
    HELPFUL VOTES
    2
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    24
    1
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "should be a part of everyone's collection"

    Need more truth tellers like Rothbard, who valued the advancement of truth and reason over the advancement of his own status or career.

    2 of 3 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Kurt Frey 04-06-16
    Kurt Frey 04-06-16 Member Since 2015
    HELPFUL VOTES
    4
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    127
    1
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Nontraditional History"
    Any additional comments?

    Well written and thoroughly researched, but not a mainstream perspective on money and banking. This book is more accurately described as an apologia for the Austrian School of economics than a traditional history text.

    The publication (2002 1st Edition produced by Audible in 2016) is a collection of the writings of Murray Rothbard (1926 - 1995) arranged to provide a narrative from the Colonial period through the end of World War 2. Most or perhaps all of these writings pre-date the end of Bretton Woods / gold-exchange standard in 1971.

    4 of 10 people found this review helpful

Report Inappropriate Content

If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.

Cancel

Thank you.

Your report has been received. It will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.