Peter Aykroyd spent his childhood watching his family’s parlor séances through the crack of a basement door. Here, for the first time, Aykroyd tells the strange and delightful story that inspired his son, Dan, to make the mega-hit Ghostbusters.
Part history, part family legend, A History of Ghosts starts in 1848 in upstate New York, where the spiritualist craze first began. Aykroyd introduces the listener to notable mediums while telling the story of the development of spiritualism, interweaving a personal history marked by a fascination with ghosts and spirits with the larger narrative about the role the paranormal has played in our culture. Such legendary figures as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and Harry Houdini appear - and vanish.
Everyone loves a good ghost story. Successful TV shows such as Medium and Ghost Hunters are proof that our national obsession with ghosts is here to stay. Millions of Americans believe in the paranormal—and even skeptics have heard a bump in the night and suspected it might be something supernatural.
©2009 Peter H. Aykroyd (P)2010 Audible, Inc.
"Less a Ghostbusters also-ran than a knowing, historical origin story, this is a smart consideration of the paranormal and a curious artifact of the Aykroyd legacy." (Publishers Weekly)
I'm not sure what I expected from this book. I love Ghostbusters and Ghost Hunters, so I thought this would be an interesting book. I also found it interesting that the Aykroyd family had a history with ghosts.
I think a history of human interest in the paranormal would have been very interesting in its own right. I also think a detailed history of the Aykroyd family's experiences with the paranormal would have been quite interesting.
This book attempts to do both, and the result is a vague overview of the paranormal. The author tells us of mediums through the course of history, only to later say that they were eventually debunked as frauds. He even admits that it would have been simple for even his own family's encounters with mediums and ghosts to have been fraudulent. It left me constantly wondering: So...do you think this stuff is real or not?
I suppose if the book would have had a clear thread, or point of view, it would have been helpful. I couldn't decide if our narrator was a true believer, or a solid skeptic, even though he says several times that he believes.
Perhaps I would have enjoyed it more if it had been two novels with a more focused purpose. I can't really blame the narrator, Jeremy Gage, for how dry the material is. Though he didn't help the novel very much with his dull reading style.
Overall, it was only very mildly entertaining. I could have spent the credit better on another novel.
I am a retired Court Reporter and I LOVE books. All kinds of books but my favorites are mysteries and period books. I like civil war books and some biographies.
I'm a fan of Dan Aykroyd but this was a terrible,terrible book. It couldn't hold my interest for even one chapter. I tried several times to listen to it. I even bought the hard copy of the book but still couldn't read it. It was just the most boring book ever written.
S. J. Swan
I would have liked more anecdotal material than this. It read like a text book and was very dry.
because it is sure to put you to sleep! This tops the list of most boring books I've downloaded in more than 2 yrs. The reader is dull and forever skips to "Boxes" and "Notes" to further explain some boring piece of trivia. I've tried to listen to this book so many times and have been unable to do it. I would sooner watch paint dry than listen to this! Save your credit and don't waste it on this fluff.
I felt betrayed by the sample read by Dan Aykroyd. If you think this book will be read by Dan, you are as wrong as I was. Dan only read the introduction, while the entire book was read by Jeremy Gage.
Maybe comparison of past and present processes.
Reading someone's diary was boring.
I collect spores, molds, and fungus.
Pretty much more of a book about seances and the history of the modern interest in the paranormal. Not much about ghosts and really, I think it only mentions 'ghostbusters' a scant few times. For those with an interest in the paranormal it isn't a bad listen, but be ready to learn more about what happened at seances rather than experiences with paranormal activity. Kind of boring in some parts.
I didn't care that Dan didn't read the entire book, like some other reviewers did. I felt that Jeremy Gage did an adequate job. The Aykroyd family history with mediums was interesting. It was nice to know that the author was working from direct experience with the subject. Plus, the author did a good job of establishing his comfort with the material. The author goes into detail on the mediums and how the whole movement escalated.
This book is a good history of the medium movement from someone who was there. I think this book treats the material very objectively and it's worth a read.
My only complaint with it is that this book does get boring in some parts.
Report Inappropriate Content