"Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." These are the first words of Michael Pollan's In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto. Scott Brick narrates these opening sentences with slowly paced emphasis and a nicely modulated deftness, with a hint of coyness. The coyness is Pollan's. For what else can one eat but food? And why does eating need a manifesto? Pollan answers that we increasing do not eat food (whole food) but rather consume processed "food products". We are in "The Age of Nutritionism". Pollan's In Defense of Food is a richly developed polemic against the unhealthful food culture that the ideology of nurtitionism represents. The book is as well a de facto manual for growing and eating our way out of it.
Brick is a compelling spokesman for Pollan's argument. He brings to In Defense of Food a voice in the baritone-to-tenor range, with an always on-the-mark sonic focus matched with a point of expressive emphasis that constantly shifts, as Brick makes his flawless and fluent runs up and down and within his octave ranges. Brick's doing all of this can only be achieved by natural talent, disciplined training, and smart reading joined by a mastery of a quite large array of narrative and expressive skills.
It is very likely that somewhere in some academic haven there are specific concepts and a precise language that could quantify and describe what goes on with Brick's narrative voice. In the end, though, it all comes down to art. Using, with apologies, an extended metaphor, that of jazz: Brick picks up his axe (saxophone), fingering the notes and changing the octaves with the keys; with his fine set of chops (lips) applies the pressure onto the sax's mouth piece and reed, and, modulating the breath and applying nuances of feeling and expression, blows -- that is, in jazz-speak -- plays. The well-argued and passionate polemic that is In Defense of Food is, in this audio production, a show piece showcasing Scott Brick's narrative range and dexterity. David Chasey
In looking toward traditional diets the world over, as well as the foods our families-and regions-historically enjoyed, we can recover a more balanced, reasonable, and pleasurable approach to food. Michael Pollan's bracing and eloquent manifesto shows us how we might start making thoughtful food choices that will enrich our lives and enlarge our sense of what it means to be healthy.
©2008 Michael Pollan; (P)2008 Penguin Audiobooks
By not being afraid to question the science behind food research and addressing the business of food production, Pollan presents a solid, common sense approach to eating healthy and the state of food in our culture. The narration of this book, however, intoned too much personal opinion, even sarcasm, for non-fiction work. For me, the narrator undermined the integrity of the book which is not at all prevalent in its written form.
Good info, good ideas, great research. Pollan is brilliant.
The narrator read this like it was a novel of some sort. He sounded sarcastic and trite at times.
read this now
the criterion of how to shop
getting it read
the part about corn being shoved down our throats
No, Its not that I disagreed with him but...it got very boring and lacking of facts.
Don't think I will, I might ask for a refund for this book.
His style is a bit better for fiction than non fiction.
The negative approach to this book made it almost unbearable. The book didn't defend a whole food diet but rather took a very confrontational offensive approach to the poor dietary choices we make today.
I like Michael Pollan, but this book was definitely not one of his best.
Good narration-poor story to tell
What a waste of my listening time.
The overall thesis of this book is interesting and in my opinion valid: "Eat food. Not to much. Mostly plants". The underlying point, that both what we eat and how it is produced has changed dramatically over the past forty years, is interesting and generally substantiated.
However, the book was extremely repetitive. The same theme was hit over and over again without going into more detail each time. Overall I found this book was not researched well enough and relied far to much on generalities. Particularly annoying was the unsubstantiated and oft repeated claim that 'traditional diets' are healthier than modern diets. Although this may be true, Pollan provides no evidence for this, nor does he even try to take on the obvious rebuttal that we live far longer today than we ever did on 'traditional diets'.
As I am already sympathetic to the underlying cause, I really hoped this book would be more convincing than it actually was.
This book was not that imformative beyond what we already know. It is simply discouraging because without a cow, piq and a garden, he teaches that we are all going to die. save for the last segment it was not well written. a lot of repeated information
the narration. i loved reading the book. i hated listening to it. it definitely ruined an awesome read.
do yourself a favor and listen to a sample. what were they thinking?
There are no listener reviews for this title yet.
Report Inappropriate Content