As Arthurian myth sowed the seeds of democracy, The Rowan Tree foretells a world of founded upon dignity. Anchored by a pair of interlocking love stories, this unflinching novel of ideas brims with passionate quests, revelatory failures, and inextinguishable hope.
The Rowan Tree is an inspirational tour de force that reaches from the rebellious American '60s into humanity's global future. Soul-searching treks around the world intersect with campus revolution, basketball, math, ballet, and a destined rise to the White House. Love runs ahead of politics and lights the way for nations to follow.
©2013 Robert W. Fuller (P)2013 Robert W. Fuller
I have started and stopped this book 3 times. the Narration is sooooooo boring. No inflection in his tone. he reads like an elementary student just trying to get through the chapter, outloud. wish I could get a refund.
I loved the descriptions of travel and the dignity project! In this election era, it was refreshing to think that there may be politicians who can see the need for dignity for all human beings.
I thought the story was smart and I learned a bit about politics, history and the ways that we can all help mankind.
Rowan. He is so wise!
When Adam knew that he wanted to move forward in his life, but was not sure how to do that and still have a huge positive impact that he longed to make. I am envious that he had the means to explore the world and loved learning his insights through his photography.
Comments made about the author reading his own work are unfounded. I also thought that when I first discovered he was the reader, but this author read his own meaning into the work and his voice was soothing. I felt he portrayed each character's personality perfectly.
This author did his book an injustice by narrating it himself. It was extremely difficult to listen to - dull, expressionless and monotone..
As for the story, a good editor could have cut its length in half and greatly improved the story. It is cluttered with unnecessary, mundane detail and preaches to the reader about the way the author views the world. By far the first part of the book set in the 1970s was the most interesting and even that needed editing.
No. The review of changes in higher education is interesting, and the vision for how to make the world better is appealing, but telling this story through a fantasy character (so smart, so wise, so able to use power effectively, so brave, so so sexy) makes that character an unreliable narrator. He will fight for necessary changes with more rights for students, especially women and minorities, but he abuses his power as a college president to sleep with (exploit) a student.
No. His voice is deep and resonant, but the reading is surprisingly flat in places, and sometimes I couldn't tell which character was speaking. I finish everything (dinner, my projects, my audible books), but I couldn't finish this book. It might have been better to read this book.
I couldn't not finish this one, but I truly wish that I had read, rather than listened to it. I have read reviews where people have suggested that authors should never read their books for the audio version. This is definitely one of them. I had to speed up the narration just to be able to continue to listen to his voice!
The story was certainly interesting, as were the characters. Although the book was long, the characters were never completely fleshed out and neither were their stories. I was intrigued with the concept of dignity and governance, and wondered where the author was taking this. Yet again this was another concept that was never fully fleshed out, and which was left hanging.
I am left with ideas & concepts which I will continue to mull over & see where they take me personally. Was this the author's intent?
I could not give it a better rating, and I cannot recommend it to anyone else to listen to.
Listening to this narrative was awful. No change in voice at all for different characters. Almost like having a computer read for the lack of inflection.
Not if he reads it.
Didn't finish the story because of the awful narration.
Having the author read this book was a disaster. No inflection, no ability to switch voices between characters, I returned it before I was half way through. Could not force myself to endure another minute.
Not on a bet.
An actor for the narrator.
The story was fine but the narration was terrible. He reads with a monotone and it's difficult to stay focused on the storyline.
The story was OK.
Have someone else narrate. While I enjoyed Mr. Fuller's story, he should not have narrated it. His narration was tedious/monotonous to listen to and without the "acting out" or performance of the parts of the different characters. The story itself was interesting and was the only reason I kept going, but it would have been better with a good narrator who could have better performed the different roles.
No. He needs to stick to writing the books.
Report Inappropriate Content