Intellectually gifted but emotionally unfulfilled, Quentin Coldwater is as much at sea as any high school senior. He still takes refuge in the fantasy novel series he read as a kid, waiting for happiness to fall in his lap. Surprisingly, it does indeed seem to when an elite and secret college of magic recruits him. Mark Brahmall wonderfully inflects the gaggle of fallible little geniuses Quentin grows up with there: Elliott the flaming drunkard, Janet the flashy attention hog, Alice the wallflower, Josh the bumbling frat boy, and Penny the punk rocker. This is not the nice and polite world of Hogwarts. These 17-year-olds spend five years drinking, screwing, cursing, and occasionally buckling down to work with spells that sound more like chemistry labs than fantastic miracles.
Magic is hard, and growing up proves even harder. Brahmall ages this group of would-be adventurers, gradually inserting the pessimistic uncertainty that creeps in as their graduation approaches, and then the slovenly vulgarity that accompanies their post-grad malaise in New York. But their voices find fresh purpose and energy when Penny discovers that Fillory, the magical land of those books from their youth, is real. Fraught with the tensions sprouting between them, each member of Quentin's posse has reasons to escape into Fillory. Brahmall gives voice to everything from a birch tree to an ancient ram, as the group's quest for a brighter future turns ever more ugly and alarming. Quentin's once idyllic dream now corrupted, he struggles to regain a sense of self and return to the more banal hostilities of the real world.
This is a story narrated with all the wonderment and gravitas inherent in the great tradition of magical coming-of-age tales, to be sure, but it rests firmly on the rocky foundations of a realistic human volatility and longing that may want to keep the characters snatching defeat from the jaws of victory to their bitter end. This world is nothing like Narnia or Middle Earth, and listeners with knowledge of those places will find plenty of insider references here to keep them laughing through the disasters. Grossman has captured a shamefully universal set of psychological quandaries, and Brahmall has expressed them in tones that are terrifyingly recognizable. Megan Volpert
Quentin Coldwater is brilliant but miserable. A senior in high school, he's still secretly preoccupied with a series of fantasy novels he read as a child, set in a magical land called Fillory. Imagine his surprise when he finds himself unexpectedly admitted to a very secret, very exclusive college of magic in upstate New York, where he receives a thorough and rigorous education in the craft of modern sorcery.
He also discovers all the other things people learn in college: friendship, love, sex, booze, and boredom. Something is missing, though. Magic doesn't bring Quentin the happiness and adventure he dreamed it would. After graduation, he and his friends make a stunning discovery: Fillory is real. But the land of Quentin's fantasies turns out to be much darker and more dangerous than he could have imagined. His childhood dream becomes a nightmare with a shocking truth at its heart.
At once psychologically piercing and magnificently absorbing, The Magicians boldly moves into uncharted literary territory, imagining magic as practiced by real people, with their capricious desires and volatile emotions. Lev Grossman creates an utterly original world in which good and evil aren't black and white, love and sex aren't simple or innocent, and power comes at a terrible price.
©2009 Lev Grossman; (P)2009 Penguin
"This is a book for grown-up fans of children's fantasy and would appeal to those who loved Donna Tartt's The Secret History. Highly recommended." (Library Journal)
"Provocative, unput-downable....one of the best fantasies I've read in ages." (Fantasy & Science Fiction)
"The Magicians is to Harry Potter as a shot of Irish whiskey is to a glass of weak tea." (George R.R. Martin)
This book starts off slow, has moments of great writing but refuses to take off with it.
I feel like Grossman keeps telling us how brilliant these characters are and expects us (the readers) to believe it without a shred of evidence in the story.
The characters go through the riggers of the plot and don't show any signs of growth.
I enjoyed the audio version, it was well read. Bramhall has a soothing and consistent voice throughout. I would only argue his voice for "Josh" doesn't match the character in the story.
Did not finish. Made it a little over halfway through the audiobook...and I'm quitting.
Touted as "Harry Potter for adults" naturally I wanted to read it. *sigh* Not even close. Zero likable characters, lame world building, a dull plot, pointless and kind of creepy sex scenes (probably to make it clear that "this is an adult book, not that silly childrens' book Harry Potter"), the use of "they" to just describe whole classes of students ("They spent that last semester in boredom...."), and references to real world literature (Tolkien, HP, The Phantom Tollbooth) as if name dropping would make this book better....and then an overlying theme of the main character being obsessed with a serious of childrens' books that is CLEARLY a reference to Narnia but thinly veiled under a different name.
Halfway through the first book, they're now graduating school/college, so that was five years in half a book. I'm assuming the rest of the series is about their time as "adult" magicians?....but that just makes the whole school section pointless. It WAS pointless, now that I think of it. Magic, instead of being exciting and wonderful, was boring and tedious to learn, thus their school years are tedious and uninteresting. Basically, there's no interesting in-depth look at how magic is learned, we're just told that "they" learn magic, and then pretty much just spend all their time drinking excessively, bored out of their minds, playing pool and some magical game that "they" obsess over, having lots of sex (and Antarctic orgies...yeah, that happened), and generally acting pretentious, selfish, and annoying. The author was big on "telling, not showing"...instead of showing us WHY Quentin and the other students loved their school, he just tells us that they did. Instead of showing us HOW they learned magic, most of the time he just tells us that they did.
Likes to listen while doing chores; likes to write reviews while he should be doing chores.
This book definitely has a good setup. The magic school piece is not an innovation, but the story of it is pleasant enough. That is about the first half of the book. The second half is about seeking and finding a Narnia-like world. It is not merely similar to Narnia, it is an intentional reference. I enjoyed this premise as it has the effect of bringing adult fans of childhood fantasy novels along with the protagonists on their adventure.
What fantasy reader hasn't wanted to make that trip? This was my favorite element.
I can't give universal praise though. The trip to Fillory (Narnia) has bad narrative pacing. Someone makes a surprise discovery of a clue; from there, the adventure to get there is a few short pages of magical tinkering. Once they get there, they are given a quest, because that is what you do when you get to a magical land. They make short work of the quest and then it's over.
It is pretty clear that Grossman is trying to make a statement about the disillusionment of seeing childhood fantasy through an adult's eyes. Grossman is making a parody of children's fantasy by making the same mistakes. That is ok, but he doesn't do it with any kind of wink to the reader. He mocks fantasy with a grimace, not a smirk. It left me feeling like, even though I was a kid, I was such a sucker to love fantasy.
The other depressing element is the protagonist, Quentin. He's a kid that is basically given everything including brains, magical powers, a busty girlfriend, and the opportunity to live out his childhood dream. He spends the whole book wallowing in self-pity almost to the last sentence. I am not sure whether this is a critique on the near universal upbeat attitude of most fantasy characters. Seems likely, but it also makes it a burden to read. Quentin carries pubescent angst into his late 20s. It is hard to watch a child not grow up. Presumably, significant experiences in a story like this should change a character. Nope.
The reader was good. He did some good characterizations. One character he voiced, I just wanted to punch in the face. I guess I mean that as a sort of a compliment, The voice was certainly distinctive and that was the case with most in his reading. That one was just nails on a chalkboard for me.
I probably will not continue with the series. My problem is that I need a character to root for or against. This book didn't really give me one.
Everything. Fairly strong beginning and then lots and lots and lots of meaningless non-developments and uninteresting characters. Described as "Harry Potter for adults." Not even close. I am giving it up, half way trough. Tries really hard to be imaginative, but it does not succeed. Un exciting read.
Good performance, but cannot save the book.
Big disappointment. Do not bother.
Banks on an idea that sold well. It's derivative and lacking any substance,
The Magicians isn't about friendship Harry Potter thrives on, or the beauty of another world that Narnia is about. But it is commonly falsely compared the two. The Magicians is not for those looking for the two, it borrows some ideas from the two, but is nothing like either.
The Magicians is in the best way I can describe a book that understands what it is straight from the beginning. Though not a happy uplifting book, its a great view of how magic would be used in the real world.
The only way I can tell someone if they would like this book or not is if they understand this is about a group of unhappy smart people who discover they can use magic and that the main character is someone who is self destructive and would do anything in his search for happiness.
The Magicians is Beautiful, not flawless. It's not for everyone and it won't be a story that I would recommend to most people, but to those who are looking for a great story and aren't afraid of imperfect characters and concepts that aren't completely original then The Magicians is territory that must be explored.
The performance was really quite good, though I did find the tone to be sometimes a bit boring... but for what Bramhall was working with, he did a phenomenal job.
I wanted to like this book, so much. I like the IDEA behind the book, a disaffected teenager finds that magic doesn't solve all of his problems, and how that fits into the real world. I even like the excessive nods to Narnia. I wanted to know how it ended, which is why I gave it two stars, though it's probably more a 1.5.
But my god this book was boring. I kept waiting for something to happen and when something finally WOULD happen it would pass by quickly leaving several more pages of nothing to follow. Despite all this nothingness, most of the characters were undeveloped, unlikable, and unsympathetic.
Also, good god Grossman - enough with the similes. It's like he took the English language and threw it in the washing machine and it bled all over everything. I would have liked this book if he had skipped all the boring nothingness and focused on the interesting.
If you go into The Magicians comparing it to other books, you may find yourself disappointed. But if you accept it on its own level, you may, as I did, find yourself enjoying it. This book is very well written. Grossman can really spin a tale. And the characters are starkly contrasted and interesting in their flaws and strengths. I will be (happily) reading book two. And likely any more that come along in the series.
I won't go quite so far as to give this a two-star rating, but it's really not so great. It starts off with some potential, but once it gets moving along it's really more depressing than anything. I don't mind "dark" or more adult fantasy novels, but this is more of a novel about a bunch of boring, alcoholic, screwed up people that just happen to live in a world where magic is real.
Just not a big fan of this book. Kept hoping it would get better but I was unfortunately disappoointed. Keeps feeling like an adult Harry Potter without the fantastical world and great dialog. Was more like Harry Potter meets Wicked and I felt the same way about Wicked. Most of the book was narrator exposition with little actual dialog and when there was, it was boring and lacked dramatic tension. The protagonist, Quentin, was annoying at best, and there was nothing sympathetic about him to care about.
Since having kids - the luxury of sitting down and reading a book is out of the question. Now I can put on good book for just me, or one for the kids while driving and everyone is at PEACE and no one is YELLING. Life is good.
I've tried to get in touch with the story, twice. Once way before the series started. I liked the series, then tried again
The narrator BORES me, or the story. I just can't get into.
Report Inappropriate Content