A tunnel, a light, a door. And beyond it...the unimaginable.
Dr. Joanna Lander is a psychologist specializing in near-death experiences. She is about to get help from a new doctor with the power to give her the chance to get as close to death as anyone can.
A brilliant young neurologist, Dr. Richard Wright has come up with a way to manufacture the near-death experience using a psychoactive drug. Joanna’s first NDE is as fascinating as she imagined — so astounding that she knows she must go back, if only to find out why that place is so hauntingly familiar.
But each time Joanna goes under, her sense of dread begins to grow, because part of her already knows why the experience is so familiar, and why she has every reason to be afraid. Yet just when Joanna thinks she understands, she’s in for the biggest surprise of all — a shattering scenario that will keep you feverishly reading until the final climactic page.
©2001 Connie Willis (P)2012 Audible, Inc.
“A true heir to John Donne, Kurt Gödel and Preston Sturges, a wit with a common touch who’s read more great books, and makes better use of them in her work, than two or three lit professors put together.” (Newsday)
“Willis has developed an idea that bears all the authority of a genuine insight: disturbingly plausible, compelling, intensely moving, and ultimately uplifting.” (Kirkus Reviews, Starred Review)
“Thoughtful, often fascinating ... Willis makes Lander’s journeys into the afterworld increasingly frightening and compelling." (Chicago Tribune)
Oof. Good story, good writing, but wayyyyyy tooooooo drawn out. It reads as though the author thinks that 45 things need to get in the way of every plot event, when sometimes a simpler path would have been better. I'm surprised I finished it.
The narration was great, each character coming to life! And the story, with its twists and unexpected turns was captivating.
I have read the Oxford time travel books by Connie Willis , of which I enjoyed. I had higher expectations for this book. A lot of rambling , & the story line just didn't click for me.
Connie Willis owes me a credit. I listened to the ENTIRE 29 hours 44 minutes and this book and it never got past its first act (to borrow a stage term). After the first 4 hours, I mostly had it play for the soothing sound of Dina Pearlman's voice. When my mind wandered, as it often does while listening and doing something else, I never had to back up to listen again to what I had missed because NOTHING HAPPENED. It is almost 30 hours of speculation about what happens when you die. Great for helping you fall asleep. Do not expect a story.
The book followed a topic that I have always found interesting.
Her reading style takes alot to get use to. She made the main charactor of this book ALWAYS sound so ominous. It was a struggle at times listening to her, but the story itself was good enough to keep me going.
If I had the time to sit and listen to an entire book at one time, this book would not be the one.
The story line is good. The book is about 200 pages to long. While I really enjoyed the story line, at some points it did get montonous, the same thing over and over again. I would recommend this book to someone, overall it is a good listen.
yes. Good narrator, will make them think and question their beliefs about death
Heaven is For Real is one book which I might compare this audiobook to. Both books explore what happens when a person dies, and each book takes a unique perspective. Some people, like myself, believe that when we die, we will go to Heaven and be with our religious Savior, such as Christ. Others have a more secular view, that life simply stops at death. After listening to both books, people on both sides will be able to debate the issue, inteligently.
No, but, like J. Charles, I found her to be a captivating narrator. I would listen to her audiobooks, again.
It would be Joanna, definitely! I could not stand Mr. Mandrake, and I think Richard would be engrossed in his experiments with diazamine, (I can't remember the drug that was used to put the subjects into near-death experiences), but I think that Richard would be too wrapped up in his work to be interesting. Kit is trying to take care of her uncle who has Alzheimer's, and I want her to spend as much time with him as she can. Joanna would probably be an interesting person to talk to, and I think I could learn a lot about the near-death research that she has been working on. That type of thing, (neurological research), really interests me.
You will not be prepared for the surprising ending, or for what happens to Joanna just as she makes the important breakthrough about the neurological role in the near-death experience! If you are interested, get Passage by Connie Willis!
We are a couple who love books and occasionally write reviews. We rarely read the same book so our reviews express our individual opinions.
Not really. There were some interesting sections and some of the characters were likeable, but 30 hours was too long for a story that did not have much of a plot. I have an interest in NDEs but this book dealt with the topic in a very creative but somewhat bizarre manner.
I enjoyed the narration and thought she handled the different voices quite well and made the story more interesting. I don't think I would have kept going with the story if I had been reading a printed book.
Please no. As the whole book seemed to be trying to prove that NDEs were some sort of brain reaction while at the same time also describing the perspective of people who had "passed over" but were still somehow conscious and aware, I can't imagine what sort of crazy follow up plot would allow both these contradictory scenarios to coexist.
Would be willing to try another of Connie Willis's books as lots of reviews suggest her other books are better than this one.
Report Inappropriate Content